Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Conspiracy Theorist 5: Mularkey Leaves, Offense Fails

Here's an idea - Spoon should call ALL the plays!


Imagine, for a moment, that our wildest dreams come true: Mike Mularkey leaves us for another team. That leaves us open to any available coach to fill in the vacancy, and we pick one of the young, fiery, creative coaches that should turn our offense into a juggernaut.

In the preseason, we look unstoppable. Screens are run, Julio is Fitzgerald Jr. (Actually the 3rd, as Fitz is actually a Jr.) Matty throws all over the place and Turner runs like a super beast. We throw swings to Quizz, we run fancy double moves with our WRs, etc. etc.

Regular season comes around and the League wants us to host the Saints on the first prime time game of the season, set for what appears to be an offensive firepower matchup. The game starts and...

...the offense is horrible.

Star-divide

(Disclaimer: This goes under the assumption it lasts longer than a One-Game-Suck. ((That sounds funny.)))

I've entertained this thought in my head several times, if MM leaves and our offense is suddenly worse off than it was previously with him, I think a ton of people would eat crow and of course, I'd find it a wee bit humorous (and typical of Georgia sports).

So today I simply ask you all what you would do if our new OC was not an improvement over MM? I think it's a reasonable possibility. So many people talk like MM's departure will suddenly break the ball and chain off of this offense, and you know what? It might work that way, but don't be surprised if it doesn't quite work that way.

I've said many times I'm ready for someone different to run the offensive ship, but I think we should steel ourselves in case the results are not what we desire, even if it's just initially. I feel like MM has done a little more behind the scenes than we might realize, including providing the no huddle offense that Matty runs so well.

So how 'bout it, Falcoholics? If MM goes and the O is worse afterwards, what will you do?

Personally, I'd laugh. Not at anyone on here, but because that's the kind of thing that defines Georgia sports - inexplicable failures that come after successes ie UGA's previous two first halfs in comparison to their previous two second halfs. Wee, Georgia sports.

Comment 112 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I had the same thought, I don't think it will happen but I'm not confident. I'm only confident with one possible coach...

Andy Reid, but I’m sure he is too overqualified and won’t take the job but hey, one can hope right?

Falcons- Our Trust In Matt
Hawks- Our Trust In Josh or Joe...or which ever one doesn't leave
Braves- Our Trust In Brian

by InMattWeTrust on Jan 3, 2012 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Do the right thing!

I am very confident when Mularkey leaves that this organization will bring in the right one for the job,to fire up this team. " true fans really believe,not doubt"

by Kenneth46 on Jan 3, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

You know,

I’m pretty sure that this is a much more likely occurrence than most of us expect.

Look, Mularkey isn’t stupid, as much of us would like to believe. Coordinators at the NFL level are some of the brightest football minds in the world. We (including me) lament the lack of screens and deep routes within the offensive gameplan, but I am 100% sure that there was a reason these past few years as to why they weren’t being used.

More specifically, there was a lack of available personnel over 2008-2010. We didn’t have a great pass catching running back. The fastest player on the team, Harry Douglas, was constantly injured. On the other hand, our power running game was working extremely well, and there was no reason to put too much pressure on the (still) young QB to lead the offense.

Earlier this year, we saw a shift in the scheme. There was a lot more emphasis placed on the passing game, especially on the deep routes. However, that didn’t seem to work out too well. This could have occurred for a variety of reasons (no camp, good defenses, and rookie players carrying the load, offensive line play). I thinks that these factors can easily be fixed with a full training camp and another year of experience.

If Mularkey comes back next year (which I think he will), he’ll have another year of experience for Douglas, Jones, and Rodgers; at the same time, the focus of his offense (Turner) is going to be another year out of his prime. If, at that point, we don’t see a shift in the offensive paradigm, then we have a problem. I doubt that problem will present itself.

That being said, I still say that BVG and his soft zone is a bunch of crap.

by frozendesert on Jan 3, 2012 5:17 PM EST reply actions  

And also,

these statements are appropriately a gross oversimplification of what’s probably occurring, but I still think that they’re (semi) accurate.

by frozendesert on Jan 3, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

According to Football Outsiders

our D was better than Pittsburgh’s. (6th in DVOA for us)

Also had the second best Variance (behind Denver, of all teams).

Yeah, that’s kinda hard to believe.

Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo

If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!

by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 3, 2012 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow,

Yeah, I didn’t know that.

Guess they’re on BVG’s payroll.

by frozendesert on Jan 3, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree!!

BGV’s soft zone is a bunch of crap

by Spencaman on Jan 3, 2012 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I've always said it's the playcalling

His offenses are fine. Sure, I’d wish we’d throw a couple more screens, or at least try to get the RB’s involved in the passing game, but it’s the horrible playcalling that frustrates the crap out of me.

There is a chance that his hypothetical replacement could be hypothetically worse than the hypothetical version of MM in 2012, but that’s like saying I’m gonna keep my Ford Pinto because although I may get a Ferrari for Christmas, I may also just get a pair of socks.

Dream Falcon Coordinators
OC – Norv Turner
DC – Spags

by jgentry425 on Jan 3, 2012 5:18 PM EST reply actions  

My first choice would have been...

Urban Meyer for OC…but he went to Ohio State.

So, I will just agree with yours!!

"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders

"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster

by Blood_Talon on Jan 3, 2012 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry,

he might fall sick or miss his family and retire before every Saints game.

by frozendesert on Jan 3, 2012 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah, I think a "less stressful" coaching position might do him some good...who knows!!

"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders

"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster

by Blood_Talon on Jan 3, 2012 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, it could be worse...

The Falcons could have Mike Bobo…

by Spencaman on Jan 3, 2012 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Fail *Next* Year

We average 17 points vs GB and two games vs New Orleans, neither of which have great defenses. I think he’s already failed.

by widderslainte on Jan 3, 2012 5:33 PM EST reply actions  

Second this...

I mean, could TD really hire someone who would do worse with these tools? In my mind, going sideways is the downside…

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes Sirrr...

Beat up on the whimpy kids but can hang with the playground bullys…YET…i still have hope

by Bigru3 on Jan 3, 2012 7:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If the offense is worse without Mularkey, it will just mean that the organization hired the wrong guy to replace him.

I believe that our offense could be better than it is. I believe Matt Ryan is capable of doing the things Rodgers and Brees do. I would like to see our players in a system that isn’t so, for lack of a better term, outdated. If we bring in the right guy, we could have an elite offense.

This is my corn. You people are guests in my corn.

by gilley on Jan 3, 2012 5:38 PM EST reply actions  

Yup.

Read this after my comment above… We have the talent, we have the plays. I think play selection is the key. If we had a guy that we less predictable than MM, he couldn’t help but do better.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

From Yahoo!'s Jason Cole's "Fatal Flaws of NFL Playoff Teams":

No. 5 Atlanta Falcons
Flaw: Learning to attack

Atlanta made a huge splash in the offseason when it traded up in the draft to get big-play wide receiver Julio Jones. With the exception of a nagging hamstring injury, Jones has been everything the Falcons expected, catching 54 passes for 959 yards and eight touchdowns. However, the Falcons are still largely stuck in their high-percentage, low-risk offensive philosophy and they know it. Offensive coordinator Mike Mularkey keeps too tight a grip on the play-calling, resulting in an offense that often looks to grind away in a league built on big plays. The Falcons were held to 23 points or fewer in their five games against playoff teams (1-4). They’ll likely need to get that offense clicking at a much more productive level in order for coach Mike Smith and quarterback Matt Ryan to get their first playoff win.

(I don’t think the Falcons would replace Mularkey with an offensive coordinator who would do anything other than take advantage of the talent Matt Ryan possesses. Ryan should be the offensive focal point for the foreseeable future. Michael Turner is a good back but should be seen by the organization as an important piece, not a cornerstone, of the offense.)

by Thrashy Thrashy on Jan 3, 2012 5:57 PM EST reply actions  

Dude...

don’t worry – the Falcons are not going after Mike Martz… it should be okay!

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Jan 3, 2012 6:35 PM EST reply actions  

Please no

Our O-Line would get Matt killed in his system

by Hutch11 on Jan 4, 2012 4:38 AM EST up reply actions  

If MM does leave

voluntarily or otherwise, I’d expect to see a replacement OC with a very similar playbook. I would be shocked if we were to end up with a completely different offensive personality. That isn’t to say the playcalling won’t change, but I expect the playstyle to remain very similar.

by jcaustic on Jan 3, 2012 6:59 PM EST reply actions  

I agree.

The way this team operates, I expect QB coach Bratkowski to be promoted if MM leaves. Not much will change but, hopefully enough will change so that the offense does progress.

Confidence is contagious. So is lack of confidence.
Vince Lombardi

by armchair quarterback on Jan 3, 2012 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

All we need is the non no-huddle playcalling to change, really.

If he does that, then hooray us.

Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo

If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!

by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 3, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, the fear of the unknown argument

Yep, could be worse. Unless you are 0 – 16. It could always be worse. So, let’s not change anything and be happy with what we have.

There is not a problem with that if you like where you are. I have to assume you are not as the last time we won a playoff game was 2004.

If we are going to compete with the Saints, Packers and Pats (and I think that is the goal and why we traded a draft’s king’s ransom for a WR), then either the D has to get a helluva lot better (and I don’t see that happening), or the offense does (and with MM, I don’t see that happening either). So, what to do, what to do?

by Whopper Dawg on Jan 3, 2012 7:00 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

04.

Was that the year the franchise QB won on the frozen tundra?

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 3, 2012 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

02 was that year.

If I had a nickel for everytime someone told me I should shutup, I'd probably have 5 or 6 bucks.

by pchaucer on Jan 4, 2012 2:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 4, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Hmmmmmm...
So, what to do, what to do?

Drink!! Just Drink!!

"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders

"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster

by Blood_Talon on Jan 4, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

So say for example we dont excell in this playoff tournament and we get knocked out early...what do you propose? We go back to the drawing board and hope that MM improves .

People can say were spoiled and all cuz we have a few winning seasons and that we shouldnt take that for granted but I myself as a former athlete have never been satisfied with being mediocre above average or good not great year after year. At some point the formula has to change and a transition has to begin. Will you really be satisfied if you were an Eagles fan…great tradition good years but never winning championships. Its nice and all but I’ll take my chances with someone who can work with the type of personel we have and has proof of that in their track record. This the nfl football at its highest level…we should never have to settle for “well our offensive coordinator is getting better” and hell that changes week to week quarter to quarter…imo MMs window is closing unless our offense can dominate as they should and I dont care about stats or dvoa cause that doesnt always translate into championships or wins. Hes not all to blame but hes a big part of it with inept play calling and his conservative approach or lack of adjustments.

by Bigru3 on Jan 3, 2012 7:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Stick with the plans!

He still needs to go win or lose,

by Kenneth46 on Jan 3, 2012 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't worry,

No Super Bowl-less team can reasonably be call spoiled.

It’s the monopoly-like championship collector, frontrunners (I.e. Yankees, Lakers, etc.) who are spoiled.

by Green Bull on Jan 5, 2012 8:31 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

The only way that happens is if the Falcons hire

Mike Bobo.

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 3, 2012 7:13 PM EST reply actions  

This is funny

See same thought at roughly the same time below.

by TheAreopagite on Jan 3, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

50% or greater chance

That they’d promote Bratkowski to OC in the event of Mularkey’s departure. Just pray to God that they don’t replace him with Mike Bobo from Georgia, who runs an offense so similar, you have to wonder if he’s the same guy.

by TheAreopagite on Jan 3, 2012 7:15 PM EST reply actions  

Did a little research on Bratkowskis history which was extensive

But it seems hes out of touch with the times and is very predictable…sounds like MM

by Bigru3 on Jan 3, 2012 7:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Be optimistic!

Noone wants to hear that,we as fans have gone through this long enough to dwell on your pessimistic thoughts,find something positive to talk about,or post somewhere else.

by Kenneth46 on Jan 3, 2012 7:51 PM EST reply actions  

Dave and I had similar plans for this week

so in the spirit of not regurgitating the same thing, I opted for something different.

That being said, it’s merely realism, not pessimism. If you blind yourself with optimism, you’ll find yourself being let down quite often.

I certainly hope/expect our next OC to be better. However I figured I’d ask this question, and, you know, it says “Conspiracy Theory” at the top, there.

Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo

If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!

by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 3, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Caleb's post was thoughtful

And yeah, I kind of called the positive stuff for the week.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 4, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Will not happen!

The time has come for this organization to ink it’s name among the elites. We have been in overtime a long time,and now comes the time to rise up,and be fierce and competitive.

by Kenneth46 on Jan 3, 2012 8:02 PM EST reply actions  

What if...

Our new coordinator let’s Ryan have more free reign. I think that is what matters. We can have a piece of crap coordinator but if he gives more control to Ryan I think it can help. Obviously we want the best coach possible but if it comes down to it we need to let Ryan do his thing. Someone to guide him would be nice and to create the plays and determine what new plays will beat a defense and let’s him do his thing. We are lucky to have one of the smartest QB’s in the NFL and we need to take advantage of it.

by KevinC70 on Jan 3, 2012 8:06 PM EST reply actions  

What if that qb wasn't tossing it in the stands

or at the receivers feet when he hears footsteps, the only times under pressure that he doesn’t do one of these thngs he goes like a college player to the bomb and luckily for him there are a couple of guys on our squad that can run it down.. Unless this issue is addressed it won’t matter who calls the plays. I realize he threw for a million yards and tds but how many games were lost due to throwing to the wrong team or into the ground whether at a receivers feet or just at the ground?
. Don’t get me wrong I like the kid but at this stage of the game he is no Joe Montana. I understand the stats show him as good as the top 6 or so but I say those stats don’t take the bonehead plays into account.

I do agree that the current offensive OC should give somebody free reign but I am not sure it is Ryan. Also remember what you were always taught that Malarkey meant way before you ever heard of Mike Malarkey.

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 3, 2012 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't entirely agree with this

Ryan is partially hampered by a patchwork, low performing, or low drafted offensive line. Granted, Sam Baker was drafted high, but (based on his draft position) he can be classified as “low performing.” Other than him, there hasn’t been an OT drafted above the 5th round in quite a while. We’ve drafted a few guards but, other than Justin Blalock, they are unproven, lowly drafted and/or low performing. Despite our failure to protect him with a quality offensive line, Ryan has performed pretty admirably.

You can call them “bonehead plays,” “happy feet” or whatever, but it’s a proven fact that a quarterback without adequate protection is hampered in his production. I think we owe Ryan a commitment to better protection. If he doesn’t perform like a top five quarterback then, I’ll do two things; I’ll agree you were right, and I’ll eat one of my Falcon caps.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey I am all for debate.

but nevertheless until his playoff records is .500 or better I will agree to disagree cheerfully. I do agree that he has been hampered by less than adequate protection (diplomacy in action) but TG is money on most of those plays.

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 3, 2012 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Ryan throws away because he is smart.

He can take a sack or throw away, remember this was the same line which gave up 47 Sacks in 2007 before Ryan was drafted. I think Ryan makes the line look better than they are,he throws away the ball then throw a pick or take a sack. TD and MS for some reason never drafted high for the OL, except for Sam Baker. Hope they can get some good OL in FA if not draft.

It's all about Process...

by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 3, 2012 10:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Amen

And I agree that “Ryan makes the line look better than they are…” Could he throw the ball quicker? Yes, but I blame the routes, the receivers, and perhaps even the OC for his failure to do that. If he had quick routes with open receivers to throw to, I think he’d do it. That’s part of the difference between us, the Saints, and the Packers, and it gets back to the heart of this blog question. Does the OC give us the plays and playcalling that allows us to succeed, if not excel? Not so much. I also submit that the Saints and Pack have better and more cohesive offensive lines.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that the line sucks.

That doesn’t explain why the man doesn’t remember TG on third down unless he has a week to stand around and think about it. Step to the side like “elite” QBs do when the heat is on. Brees was dead meat a dozen times in the game against us last time. Steps to the side and completes the pass, I wish we had Scam Newton some days. And you have no idea what saying that out loud actually means to me.

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 4, 2012 7:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I've wondered this alot myself

Personally, I’m not sure a change in coordinator would help. while MM has been woefully inadequate at times, we could have it much worse. Though I’m interested to see what someone else could do with the offense, maybe we should keep him. Devil You Know and all that.

by Starrk on Jan 3, 2012 8:26 PM EST reply actions  

Your opening monologue has already taken place.

We have ceilinged out under MM’s care. It’s a good time for him to find some other pups to raise, we need a champion.

Rule #1: Double tap.

by Ball Hawk on Jan 3, 2012 8:29 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Id say fire Smitty

But this is ublikely I think. If our new OC has some kind of offensive imagination we should be fine.

by pierre02 on Jan 3, 2012 10:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Yeah Fire Smitty and bring Petrino!

I want to know what are you smoking?

It's all about Process...

by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 3, 2012 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm with you, Vishnu

TD and Smitty have given us four of our most successful consecutive years ever. We need tweaking, not an overhaul. Firing Smitty would be a mistake, in my opinion, and I caan’t believe anyone suggests it.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Good ole Virginia Slims

but really If the offense is horrible then the HC should be fired. And define successful? Is that 4 consecutive years of regular season wins? How about the post season? Mora Jr. did have at least 1 playoff win. Lets see if Smitty can get his 1st.

by pierre02 on Jan 3, 2012 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

No...

if the offense is really horrible (which it isn’t, just not as productive as it should be) then the OC should either adjust or be replaced. The HC of a team that’s gone 43-21 in his tenure and made the playoffs doesn’t get canned. Lok at the records of the coaches that just got fired. Any have a record like Smitty?

by drmondo667 on Jan 3, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions  

don't forget

he’s made the playoffs 3 out of 4 years, and is the only HC in franchise history with back to back winning seasons

by falconnuke on Jan 3, 2012 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

That ain't saying much.

Just sayin……

"Everybody has a plan until they get hit" Iron Mike Tyson.
"Screw 2nd." Lugs Harvey.
"In Grimes we trust, all others get gashed"- Me.

by CaptJackSparrow on Jan 4, 2012 7:09 AM EST up reply actions  

That is saying a lot, just sayin.

You say talk when they put up a .500 win percentage in the playoffs. That’s not too far fetched, when you’ve only played two games vs the eventual conference champions. The truth is that Falcons football has never looked better in it’s entire franchise history.

We’ve gone from a legacy of loosing to perrenial playoff contenders. That deserves some leeway.

by RamblininAlb on Jan 5, 2012 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s nuts

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 10:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

there's always the "nuts" people

That assume that, regardless of everything else, three things:
1. The immediate solution to not winning a superbowl every single year is to hire a new coach.
2. There exists a better coach than the current one for this team.
3. The better coach would come at the drop of a hat.

Extend to college coaching, too.

by falconnuke on Jan 3, 2012 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Change can be good or bad.

Change is a good thing but its quite possible that it can make things worse. Its hard to know if MM is the problem or part of the Problem. If MM was the only problem and easy fix, I would imagine TD and MS would have fired him. I think MM does the best what is given to him,the OL can’t hold up for 30-40 passes a game and that leaves the offense with less options. Also I am not sure if the Falcons receivers are super talented except for JJ. Roddy white is a good Possession receiver but never gets yards after catch and HD never gets open.

It's all about Process...

by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 3, 2012 10:31 PM EST reply actions  

Fire Smitty?

Why do you say that? Look where he has gotten us in 4 short years. That’s ludicrous !!!
Guys it’s real simple IMO. O-line! Just watch Brees, Brady, Rogers and how much time they have….. LOTS OF IT !!
Turner gets stuffed? Poor push and lack of domination at the line. It’s so easy to see when you look back!
Now to the D! Why do we get torched in the secondary? Our D-line hardly gets pressure on the QB. Try covering a Finley, Graham, Johnson for very long and they will get open!
These are the main problems this year.
Now do we need more creativity with the offense, hell yes! We are one of the lowest yardage teams on screens, why? MM.
But fellas until these line issues are addressed we are mediocre until then I’m afraid!

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 10:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Agreed!

The battle is won in the trenches. OL and DL need to step up.

It's all about Process...

by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 3, 2012 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Bingo!

I’ve made this point elsewhere, and I’m sticking to it. If we has a premier offensive line, we’d be absolutely unstoppable. If we had a good defensive line to go with it, we’d be historic.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

^^^This, This and This^^^

"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders

"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster

by Blood_Talon on Jan 4, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm scared now.

Ranked Top Ten QB.
Ranked Top 5 RB.
Two Ranked Top 15 WR.
Ranked Top 10 TE.
Ranked Top 15 Defense.
Ranked 32 in Superbowl Vict

by InMattWeTrust on Jan 3, 2012 10:32 PM EST reply actions  

Matt has had off games this year I’ll give ya that. But this BS about his arm strength I’m sick of. He has enough to ZING IT on short and medium routes. HIS INTELLIGENCE AND TOUGHNESS can take us a long way.
Get our line to give him more time AND room to step up and the occasional bomb will be there.

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 10:42 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

if the O

does regress then MM is the greatest mind of our time. His utter lack of innovation and utilization of talent will be talked about for many years

by Erihury on Jan 3, 2012 10:51 PM EST reply actions  

Giants fans.

I’m the last person to let opposing fans opinions frustrate me but there’s one comment that keeps annoying me from their fans. Alot of them are underestimating Brent Grimes. I think it’s partly because his name isn’t thrown around alot on tv but spreaking out of ignorance about his abililty kinda bothers me. I know that Cruz is a great wr and has been dominant all season, but so has Grimes. Grimes will most definitely be the best cb Cruz has faced all year besides Revis. I don’t believe Grimes will completely shut him down, but I do believe it will be a great matchup. What do you guys think?

by dirtybird in ak on Jan 3, 2012 11:00 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Blue review

I saw a few comments today and yes I agree with you!
Cruz is good but they think he walks on water. Optimus Grimes will teach him I believe!

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 11:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Megatron > Cruz

That’s my opinion Giants fans, so take it for what you will. He’s bigger than Cruz, at least as fast, can leap higher, and has better ball skills.

Grimes pretty much made him a non-factor all game, and that’s with Grimes having something like a 6 inch disadvantage. Do I think Grimes can possibly take Cruz out of the game? yes. Would I be surprised if Cruz got a td? probably not. But I would be surprised if Cruz gets some 80 yard or otherwise crazy long td.

by falconnuke on Jan 3, 2012 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed!

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 11:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

and I don't mean this in "disrespect of the Giants"

or anything like that. This is just what I’ve seen based on the play of Grimes throughout this year and last year.

by falconnuke on Jan 3, 2012 11:26 PM EST up reply actions  

The one thing

That scares me in that matchup would be Grimes going for the pick and missing it, resulting in a TD..

by Kossart on Jan 4, 2012 10:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

He hasn't been doing that a lot since 09.

In 10 he was put in the starting role and corrected som fundamentals, as a result he has less picks and tons more passes defended.

Rule #1: Double tap.

by Ball Hawk on Jan 4, 2012 11:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I've noticed that

he’s more of a complete player now. At one point he was turning into mr “it’s either an interception or a td” DeAngelo hall

by falconnuke on Jan 4, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Grimes will get his and Cruz will as well

Cruz may make one or two good plays to keep the drive going, and Grimes will defend some passes.
Cruz might get one TD at best but Grimes at best might get an INT.

by brotherbrown on Jan 5, 2012 3:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Website

On the Falcons website the wizard ( lol) is asked many questions by D-leb of the AJC!

by Sbaron55 on Jan 3, 2012 11:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Hey, let's keep all this in perspective

Mike Mularkey isn’t the devil. Is he as smart as he thinks he is? Probably not. Is he our OC next year? Same answer. Will we improve? I think so, if TD can hire a stud. If we had an offensive brain that could match the Saints or Pack this year, I think we’d be a division champion again. Probably not a first seed, but at least a third. We’d have won Saints game at home, and the Texans game on the road. Probably even the Tampa Bay game. Champs again.

So, could Boudreau do it? Maybe. Will an offensive genius be available? I don’t know, but I’m willing to bet that TD does, and that AB will be willing to pay for it. Either way, Mularky’s probably gone, and I prefer to think that will be a good thing.

by randomaxe on Jan 3, 2012 11:06 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 4, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I think this team needs an OC that can manage the entire offense on his own(except for MR2, ideally they would work together) so that Smitty can turn his full attention to the D and “tighten up” the BVG scheme. The D is not broken. It bends but usually(note: I said “usually”) doesn’t break. Smitty is a D oriented coach and he could work with BVG to maximize potential.

Also, I ate a lot of crow on Matty Ice, but he has convinced me. I agree we need to get him better play calling and protection, but I think he could work on his pocket movement and escapability some. Instead of fleeing every time he hear footsteps, a couple steps this way or that could lead to some great plays.

by birdwatch on Jan 4, 2012 12:25 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

With more time and experience I think he will slow down the happy feet

by Sbaron55 on Jan 4, 2012 5:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

What so you mean turn his attention to the D

Do you think he’s been working on the offensive scheme these last 4 years while BVG installs a defensive scheme he doesn’t agree with? He’s a defensive coach and this is his defensive scheme. The D won’t change unless Mike Smith goes.

by Mosugo on Jan 4, 2012 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

not what i meant

Being HC he is involved in O and D. I’m saying we need a strong OC so MS can put more focus on the D. Cuz the defense works, it just needs some tweaks.

by birdwatch on Jan 4, 2012 2:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Mularkey

By all accounts is very strong willed. He’s just not very good.

by Mosugo on Jan 4, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

It's the sort of thing where

with the weapons we have, it seems unlikely that that would happen. There’s probably a 30% chance of the new OC being as bad as MM, and in that case who cares, it was a statistically good move. Sometimes change is bad, yes, but usually change brings some positives somewhere, so I can’t see how a ne OC could come in and underutilise our various weapons in the same way.

Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.

Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17

by Turner_The_Burner on Jan 4, 2012 1:10 AM EST reply actions  

Well this all just depends on who the next OC is

If we do regress it just means we found a worse OC than Mularkey and in that case, shame on us.

by Hutch11 on Jan 4, 2012 4:47 AM EST reply actions  

Great top, love the responses

Bottom: line Falcons players have to show up ready to play….yes a few changes @ OC/DC need to happen….but not both in the same yr…we gotta pick on and pull the trigger see where that gets us next season then go from there. Time is now, MT & TG not getting younger soon we gonna be looking for Rbs/TEs…no knock on Jq.Rodgers

by DSGB34 on Jan 4, 2012 7:50 AM EST via Android app reply actions  

Mularkey has done great with what he has had to work with.....

The reason we got held to under 30 pts. by most of the good teams this season has more to do with personnel issues than play calling.

Here are the key reasons:

The OL has regressed significantly in year 4 of Mularkey’s offense, I think that has more to do with the regression of Sam Baker, the age of and injuries to Todd McClure, and what looks to be a fat-and-happy new contract syndrome going on (just a tad) with Clabo.

Michael Turner has clearly lost a step. I think we’d all agree. It really would not be as noticeable though if the OL had not regressed. If our OL was still blowing doors like it was in Turner’s first few years here, we’d see a lot less negatively plays. But its clear (again, I think we’d all agree) that MM’s offense would be better served with a multidimensional feature RB.

Matt Ryan is great – I love him……..but, he still needs to learn 2 key things that Peyton Manning and Tom Brady have mastered (2 QBs who both are a tad limited in mobility like Ryan). Both Brady and Manning know how to feel pressure and step up in the pocket to prolong a play. Ryan has slightly improved in this, but has a ways to go – he checks down or throws the ball away 5-7 more per game than he needs to – BECAUSE he doesn’t step up in the pocket. Second, Ryan is still not looking off DBS with his shoulders/eyes near as well as he should. I think we’d all see a lot more of those slants over the middle that we want if Ryan did a better job looking off the coverage.
I think Ryan will continue to improve in these areas, I really do, but he’s not quite there

MM is the guy – but he needs 3 things (in order of importance):

1. 2 more “athletic” OLmen who can get out on screens, blow doors, etc.

2. A new feature back who is multidimensional. MT has served us well for 4 years, but he’s not a 3 down back, so he doesn’t give defenses more to think about like a more multidimensional feature back would.

3. Continued development of Matt Ryan into a top 5 QB………he’s not there yet, but I think he’ll get there.

I agree that changes to be made in the coaching staff on the defensive side of the ball, because we are NOT maximizing our talent there. Our offense has some personnel gaps, but we are maximizing everyone except maybe HD.

by AuxiliaryHusky on Jan 4, 2012 10:35 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

amen

couldn’t agree more

Falcon Fans UNITE!

by Blue Falcon on Jan 4, 2012 2:54 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Pretty much agree with these...
The OL has regressed significantly in year 4 of Mularkey’s offense

I think letting Dahl go was a bad idea and killed allot of the cohesiveness they had. As far as Baker, you have to have “progression” to have “regression”…he just hasn’t been the player we drafted for since we drafted him.

Matt Ryan is great – I love him……..but, he still needs to learn 2 key things that Peyton Manning and Tom Brady have mastered (2 QBs who both are a tad limited in mobility like Ryan). Both Brady and Manning know how to feel pressure and step up in the pocket to prolong a play.

I agree, he still has some learning to do on “pocket management”, but he is learning fast I think.

I agree that changes to be made in the coaching staff on the defensive side of the ball, because we are NOT maximizing our talent there.

Massive understatement here!!

You already know we disagree on Turner; 100% polar opposites and will not belabor the argument. Though I do agree he is not a 3 down back but that’s what Quizz was supposed to solve and still may…he is only a rookie at present. So not 100%; more like 90/10.

And also that MM is the answer…not on your life!! Please leave for Jacksonville Mr. M and only return when you need an a$$ kicking from the Falcons!!

"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders

"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster

by Blood_Talon on Jan 4, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

3rd Down Strategy!!!

In our losses, our 3rd down conversion percentages have been in the pooper. In the wins, the 3rd down percentages are with the best in the league. I know stats are stats, but in the Monday Night loss against the saints almost all the Falcon’s stats were on par with the Saints…except 3rd down conversions. Our lack of converting them and N.O’s ability to convert the majority of theirs was the reason we were blown out. Setting up 3rd downs takes a solid 1st and 2nd down strategy – which I felt like we had last year (albeit conservatively). Trying to add more yardage depth in our plays seems to have really hurt our 3rd down ability against good teams. If we convert 55% or more of our 3rd downs on Sunday, we beat the Giants.

by JakeKohl on Jan 4, 2012 11:07 AM EST reply actions  

Mike Martz

I have not read all the comments that were made yet, so this may have already been said, but Mike Martz is now on the Market. His O shemes consist of a lot of play actions and screens, combine with a hard nose running game, he maybe the perfect fit.

by SAVFALCON on Jan 4, 2012 11:18 AM EST reply actions  

Not TE friendly.

Which could be a good thing since Tony is on the downside of his career, Matt will still get the ball in his hands on 3rd down anyway.

Rule #1: Double tap.

by Ball Hawk on Jan 4, 2012 11:53 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

also

I think Martz left for a college job.
He hasn’t exactly looked stellar in recent years.

by brotherbrown on Jan 5, 2012 3:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Elite Coordinators

In terms of W’s, MM & BVG have been top-12 coordinators for 4 years straight. Not elite, but not too shabby.
Most of us are looking for an upgrade that will bring a Superbowl ring to ATL. However, bonafide elite (top-5) coordinators are by default few and far between. Most are looking for a head coaching opportunity, which we aren’t offering. Our only choices for new coordinators are basically between promising assistant NFL/college coaches looking for a bigger opportunity or former head coaches in the NFL who were outstanding coordinators but couldn’t hack it at the top. The former have not yet proven that they can do any better than what we’ve got. The later are our safest bet, but who’s out there that we would want to roll the dice on and would be interested in the job?
Del Rio? Spags? Fisher? Morris? Sparano? Haley?

Falcon Fans UNITE!

by Blue Falcon on Jan 4, 2012 2:50 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

I would hope that a new oc would actually just enhance what Matty Ice is running already. Maybe just call different sequences to keep defense off guard. Lets face it Matty does a pretty good job in the no huddle, he pretty much can call his own game.

by shadrck on Jan 5, 2012 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

Defense

My main concern is lack of qb sacks this year. It seems Abraham and Edwards are all around the qb but can never get their hands on him. I don’t understand how they can be so close and not get their so much. We need more pressure I believe to improve next year.

by shadrck on Jan 5, 2012 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

Some appear to want to perfect an already great offense more than improve a defense that needs help; but the latter is more important. The Falcons need some balance, and a defense that can help keep games-against the NFL elite-close enough for the offense to find a win.

The blowout 2011 playoff loss to the Packers last winter was a big lesson.

by Green Bull on Jan 5, 2012 8:57 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Falcoholic Primer

Where Falcons fans come to roost.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Falcoholic_icon_small
Never too early to........
Small
Third Down Pass Defense: Mike Nolan Edition
Small
Ryan vs Brees/Manning/Brady: Why Ryan Can be an Elite QB
Small
Third Down Sacks: Mike Nolan Edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lofton Wants A Championship
Mass-effect-3-hd-wallpaper-3_small
Atlanta’s Tight End of the future is….
Small
The Pro Bowl Changes
Small
The Screen Pass and Matt Ryan
Barnabas_collins_250x250_small
Should the Falcons pursue Kellen Winslow?
Small
Facons Pass rush

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Baron Of All He Blogs

Thefalcoholic_small Dave Choate

Marquises Of Musings

Newprofile_small Adam Schultz

Bear-woodsjpg-ee4252752e478b73_large_small James Rael

205892_10150259660296336_683626335_7946790_3837839_n_small Caleb Rutherford

Earls of Typing

181614_735189801813_23210129_40578364_6784501_n_small Jason Kirk

Img_0301_small Jeanna Thomas

40564a_small Alex Welch