It May Be Time For The Falcons To Roll Out A Flexible Offensive Line
A thought occurred to me while watching Michael Turner slice through the Buccaneers defense like hot butter, followed by Jason Snelling doing the same. Is it time for the Falcons to start making substitutions on the line?
This is a relevant question for more than one reason. The first, obviously, is that the New York Giants are not the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Theirs is a defense allowing the 19th most rushing yards in the league, not the 31st. They are capable of slowing Turner down and their pass rush is nightmarish, so the idea of playing to strengths is relevant.
The second is that Sam Baker and Garrett Reynolds did a nice job of opening holes in the run game yesterday. Pro Football Focus has noted that the Falcons have been a terrible run-blocking team in 2011, and as much as Will Svitek and Joe Hawley have been clear upgrades in pass blocking, they're not always getting it done against the run.
So it may be time for the Falcons to start making substitutions when they're able. I realize getting 300 pound men on and off the field is nobody's idea of an easy thing to do, but when you have such clear splits in run blocking and pass blocking ability, it pays to play matchups. It's going to be tough to beat the Giants if you can establish the run at all, regardless of their 29th ranked pass defense.
Of course, the problem with these kinds of switches is that they telegraph the kind of play you're going to run. If you have Sam Baker and Garrett Reynolds out there and throw, you're opening Matt Ryan up to taking some shots from guys like Jason Pierre-Paul and Osi Umenyiora.
I'd still like to see the Falcons try this as needed and see what kind of results it gets. Would you?
21 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Two Words
Great Idea
The Only Thing To Fear Is, Fear Its Self.......
by Dirtybyrdatl4life on Jan 3, 2012 8:02 AM EST via Android app reply actions
So
Sam Baker and Garrett Reynolds had success run-blocking in one game against a team rank last in stopping the run? OK….ummm I say slow ya roll on that idea. Don’t get to the playoffs and all of a sudden start trying something new that has not even been proven to work against a real opponent. The Bucs had their bags packed 3 or 4 games ago so any perceived success by our backup linemen should be taken with a granule of salt. Stick with what got you here, execute it at a high level and win the ball game with your starters on the field. Not to even mention the fact that your opponent will eventually figure out what these constant substitutions mean as far as the type of play you will run. You NEVER want your opponent to have that type of advantage in a game of this magnitude. So to answer the question…absolutely not.
I'm not just basing this on the Buccaneers game
Sam Baker has, over the life of his career, been better at run blocking than Will Svitek has this year. He’s also been appreciably worse at pass blocking. Ditto Hawley/Reynolds, though that’s a bit closer.
Your point about tipping their hand is well-taken, though. It would be hard to keep them from figuring that out for very long.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
The fact
that Sam Baker is a better run blocker than pass blocker is the reason why he’s on the bench. IMO the main priority for your LT is to protect the blindside of the QB now if he can run block as well that’s great. Both of these guys have been benched for lack of production early in the season so I just don’t think you wait until the playoffs to put these guys who lost their jobs back on the field. Turner has still managed to run for over 1300 yards at 4.5 ypc without either of them on the field.
Depends if you want a living RYAN
after the game….Sam Baker did well yesterday, but the Bucs are just awful, especially in comparison the Giants front four.
That would definately affect the no-huddle plays, though, or atleast slow it up a little. .
Will you even be able to make the correct substitutions in time? Wouldn’t it be blatantly obvious when it happens what play selection the Falcons are about choose? I agree to a certain extent but if Sam Baker comes rolling out onto the field for a a run play and Matt Ryan sees something in the defense and calls an audible from run to pass then Baker would get completely decimated by the Jason Pierre Paul. I don’t even want to think what would happen to Ryan.
Ron Artest = Ron (sm)Artest - He Is The Most Interesting Man In The World
by JoshChildressAfroIsCure4Cancer on Jan 3, 2012 9:30 AM EST reply actions
Good idea in theory
likely difficult in execution. In addition to the point you raised about possibly ‘telling’ what’s coming, there’s the idea of unity which a persistent plug and play might interfere with. I’d definitely like to see it on 3rd and Short packages where they need to run to get it, though.
by KMarch on Jan 3, 2012 10:37 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
That might be the ideal situation
It’s probably impossible to implement it otherwise, but there are some interesting splits here.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
bring baker in for short yardage
Do this a couple times and it would set up a killer play action opportunity once they key on the run
by jmpecker on Jan 3, 2012 2:05 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I hope the no-huddle is used cautiously Sunday...
…get some early success, hold Eli to a 3 and out, and hope the crowd gets quiet. We saw in Houston how badly the no-huddle can get killed when in a loud stadium.
If we can get a lead and want to pound the rock, this sounds great…but as long as flexibility is required, the upside of having Baker/RGGR on the line is vastly outweighed by the downside. Giants have 4 sack-monsters at DE, and Kiwanuka can do an inside blitz that I don’t think RGGR is ready to handle.
Like KMarch I'd like to see it on short distance packages
but it’s just the sort of thing that will lead to missed assingments in the long term of the game. We don’t need to be giving away free runners due to poor assingments, the Giants pass rush is my major area of concern this week. Starters are starters for a reason (hopefully they show that this week).
Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.
Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17
by Turner_The_Burner on Jan 3, 2012 11:11 AM EST reply actions
I have no idea if that works out
although I’d say even if it could work out, it just sounds too bold for MM and Smitty.
here’s another problem I have with this idea – it takes away what we do the best – the no-huddle. in fact, if it comes to experimenting I’d try to go no huddle all the way. change tempo from slow to fast but keep it no huddle – from what I can tell their stadium is not among the loudest.
if Baker is an upgrade in run-blocking, I’d try some formations when we keep Baker on the field as a TE. it might help both in running the ball and protecting Ryan as in max protect.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
Run blocking and Mike Cox.
Mike Cox is huge, Mike Cox is strong and Mike cox is good at thrusting through gaps but Mike Cox is no Ovie.
We miss our all-pro FB more than anyone else including the great dirtbag Harvey Dahl.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Jan 3, 2012 11:59 AM EST via mobile reply actions 6 recs
Rec for entendre.
Rec for referencing Harvey Dahl being a dirty but loveable bastard.
Rec for mentioning all-pro above Pro Bowl.
By my logic you should be green already.
Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.
Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17
by Turner_The_Burner on Jan 3, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
Just read that Tampa Bay has 21 undrafted free agents on their roster
We were supposed to whoop up on them. That’s why I waited till this game to take my son to his First Falcons Game…wanted to have a good impression.
What Coach does for the Giants…I’ll wait and see, but I really hope Comrade Dimitroff does some horse trading for a better line soon. Ryan ain’t getting any younger, and we don’t want him to a) get killed, or b) get so bruised he hears footsteps that aren’t there.
by williamandrews31 on Jan 3, 2012 6:16 PM EST reply actions
Telegraphing tendencies....
Hmmmmm, I like the sound of that. :-)
"We borrowed golf from the Scottish as we borrowed whiskey. Not because it is Scottish, but because it is good." Horace Hutchinson
No more score predictions...
Aside from the whole "telegraphing tendancies" thing...
all an opposing team has to do to stymie this idea is to run no-huddle offense when they want to counter it. Frankly, it wouldn’t work against us, and if it wouldn’t work against us, anyone else can learn to stop it. Might be good for a one-game surprise, but beyond that, it’s a trick play.
Run game
We need a back that can catch the ball out of the backfield Turner can’t catch most of the time. When he does he picks up 10-30 yards but the defenses know that he is not going to be a target out of the backfield because he can’t catch it. Just another benefit we need in the backfield.

by 













