Report: Dirk Koetter Ordered To Improve Falcons Screen Passes
I didn't quite get to this yesterday in any detail—hat tip to Jason for his coverage—but it's so encouraging that I thought you'd all delight in reading more about it.
We knew that the Falcons were likely to use the screen pass more after Mike Mularkey left. Mularkey's aversion to the play has been a meme around here for months, and it's especially baffling when you realize he had weapons like Jason Snelling and Jacquizz Rodgers to run it with.
Well, Dirk Koetter says he's a fan of screens. Even more than that, though, he's been ordered to use more screens. Seriously. Like, on a stone tablet.
The Falcons have been the worst screen team in the NFL under Mularkey, and it hasn't been particularly close. He spent a lot of time talking about how the Falcons were not a good screen team and very little time correcting that issue, so the Falcons simply didn't have that element to their offense. That made the offense more predictable, which was a terrible thing indeed. It also took away one of the few plays the Falcons had to discourage an opposing pass rush.
This tells me two things, if the team makes good on its promise. The first is that the Falcons will be looking to execute the occasional screen without totally sucking at it. The second is that the Falcons actually recognized a gaping flaw in the team and are committing to fix it. I'm cautiously optimistic.
In other news, Koetter has also indicated he tends to use the no-huddle more often. When informed of the news, Matt Ryan wept tears of pure joy.
I'm increasingly encouraged by the small changes that the Falcons are looking to make going into next season. Koetter has a lot of work ahead of him, naturally, but these are baby steps in the right direction. I'll take that, for now.
Add one more to the list. What would you like to see the Falcons commit to on offense?
127 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How about mixing up the snap count?
This has driven me nuts for a while. Can we snap the ball before we’re under 3 seconds?
by The DW on Jan 17, 2012 8:09 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
Especially on 4th and 1
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 8:31 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Good call DW
You would think they would have learned this the first time we lost to Arizona in the playoff in Matt’s rookie year?!
The more you think about it...
Mularkey strikes me as a big picture guy but lacking on tactical ability. Like some of the stuff we’re talking about are little things that can be implemented successfully regardless of personnel. Varying snap counts and screens as a base component of the offense could have been implemented LOOOONG ago which makes me even more mad the longer I think about it. The no huddle is predicated on having a quarterback smart enough to make the correct call but we have that.
Completely agree
Subtle differences like changing snap count or using screens go a long way towards keeping defenses off balance. Using these types of changes make defensive lines think a fraction of a second longer about what is coming and slows them down a step. That fraction of a second is all a good QB needs to turn a 5 yard gain into a 20 yard gain.
BIG PICTURE GUY!!!
That’s AB/TD/MS territory, what was he doing up there…he was “supposed” to be a “meat and potatoes” guy and leave the “Big Picture” to the HC and the FO!!
So basically, this guy used his time here in Atlanta “JUST” to get a head coaching job?!?!
I wouldn’t be so irritated at that as long as it didn’t come at the “EXPENCE” of this team, the players, the city and its fans…but it DID!!
DOUCHEBAG!!!
"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders
"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster
by Blood_Talon on Jan 17, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
My guess is
This is one of the problems that we weekly heard about and were going to get fixed.Too bad it only took the entire season to figure out how to fix it.
Yeah, no kidding
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
50 caliber
protect the QB and the rest will take care of it’s self.
I like it
My offensive issues were…
The predictable play calling, the beating to death of the commitment to the run, the lack of screens, the non existent vertical game. The line protection, the over usage of Turner, the Lack of usage of Snelling, Rodgers.
So far everything Koetter is planning is music to my ears. Just hope its executed to perfection.
Coaching wins championships!
You're right
It wasn’t just the lack of screen passes. The lack of a screen game is just a symptom of the cancer in the offense-no deception. Just little things to get the defense moving one way and then send then another. Well-executed screens, well-executed draws. The occasional counter. A few stretch plays with Rodgers, and just the occasional deceptive run play. Not necessarily a reverse or a double pitch.
Just give me a play-caller that knows how to mix things up and get the defense back on their heels instead of seeming like they’ve got a man in the huddle on every playcall.
Braves will be fine. I'm not worried.
by Bronn on Sep 18, 2011 4:26 PM EDT
some aggression
No more playing not to lose. “You play to win the game”!
by birdwatch on Jan 17, 2012 8:26 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Definately a
Major symptoms of the crappy coordinating around here.
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 8:42 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Get JJ and RW the ball IN SPACE
and on the run. Our physical, tackle-breaking WRs lose all their momentum with these 4s. Let them do what they do best, which is run after the catch.
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 8:40 AM EST via mobile reply actions
i was a lil nervous about the guy at first
until i took the time to look back at his past as a OC. he loves the screen pass which is a plus. he adds more vertical threats to the pass game. and i think he’ll utilize Jacquizz a lot more this year.
Yeah I liked his comment about sending multiple receivers deep
Which does several things to a backfield. Makes DBs make decisions. If they were in help…where do they go now. If they were in zone and two come close to your zone which do you take. If one was coming up for run support he’s on his heels trying to get back. Same with if one is blitzing. Should get your receivers in single coverage more often imo.
The only caveat is your line HAS to pass block effectively to let it develop. I see big changes coming to the OL on offense this year. IF we are going to try to take advantage of the vertical passing game we’ve got to block for Matt. Some of the other things mentioned above will help keep the defense honest (snap counts, screens, drags, no huddle, etc.), but there’s no substitution for getting quality OL help.
Matt needs to look at his tendencies in the no huddle too
- like 95% of the time when Matt kills a play at the line and audibles it’s to a run (that’s a problem…if I know it DCs with time to prepare and statistical analysis surely know it…meaning opposing defenses already can guess what’s coming)
I want to see
Him utilize ALL of his players ala New Orleans. I want to see HD on the field more and I’d like to see Meier get some looks in a 2 TE set. Quizz and Snelling (if he returns) should both get more snaps instead of only 3rd down looks.
I should say
I’d also like to see true five receiver sets, not three receivers with Gonzo and Turner split our wide.
DK uses lots of screen.
My friend who is Jags fan was telling me how often he used the screen and they would shout not to use it. Sounds like MM using Turner up the middle. I don’t blame DK for using screens when your QB is a rookie with no receivers and only offensive threat is MJD.
It's all about Process...
It helped that they had a great screen player in MJD
Good pass catcher who moves well in space.
Braves will be fine. I'm not worried.
by Bronn on Sep 18, 2011 4:26 PM EDT
you know what
this loss to the Giants is a blessing in disguise, and feels much better than last year’s home demolition by the Packers.
We lost badly to the Pack and yet we all thought we were just one draft pick step away from winning it all. In reality we were miles away, and those bad losses underscored glaring weaknesses we had.
This time around we know what we’re worth and we know the now the change is coming – and it’s not the same as 2008 change, since we have the main pieces of the team intact.
Can’t wait to see even a preseason game.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
Looks like it will be Tim Lewis as DC. Its not confirmed only from a source close to Falcons.
According to my sources its looking like 80 % chance of Tim Lewis being the Falcons DC. The deal with Spags might still be in place but at this point it might be a long shot. Mike Nolan apparently was never seriously in contention. Not sure if the Falcons are leaking the wrong stuff to different sources.
It's all about Process...
Please tell me you're kidding
by dirtybirds233 on Jan 17, 2012 10:32 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I wish I was kidding.
I am hoping my source was wrong.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
Which essentially means Smitty will be running the defense
Tim will be calling plays on Sunday…but if this is the case then it smacks of Smitty taking majority control of game planning & scheme imho.
IF it's Tim Lewis
DC for Pittsburg 2000 – 2003
Total Defenses of : #6, #3, #13, #15
DC for NYG 2004 – 2006
Total Defenses of: #17, #14, #24
I thought he was just the DB coach.
"NLDS or bust" - Bobby Cox
We don't have to continue to settle Atlanta. We're better than that.
by DopeFalcons on Jan 17, 2012 12:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Ok thanks
I saw some of the defensive ranks from those years of those teams but I’m more interested with his blitzing schemes.
"NLDS or bust" - Bobby Cox
We don't have to continue to settle Atlanta. We're better than that.
Wow and people thought the outrage against the Koetter hire was bad...
If they do hire Tim Lewis, this fanbase is going to have an aneurysm.
by LongSufferingFalconsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
Which means a boring 4-3
With no disguised blitzes and cover 2. Sigh
by dirtybirds233 on Jan 17, 2012 10:48 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I haven't even heard Lewis's name come up, truthfully
Not casting aspersions on your source, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Jan 17, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
I hope its wrong.
The source had a history of being right 3/4 times. However I couldn’t believe it either when I heard Tim Lewis is the frontrunner.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
I might be going out on a limb here
but if they were going to promote from inside the organization, it seems to me like they would have promoted him already, unless he was sort of a last resort, in which no Falcons fan should be upset if he’s the last option.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 17, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
Per Adam Schefter....Spags is still in play as of an hour ago
AdamSchefter Adam Schefter
RT @justcallmeFlash: Any word on Steve Spagnuolo decision yet? … Taking his time. ATL, NO, PHIL all in play. Nice to have options.
Spags already Interviewed with Falcons.
Spags just taking time and probably waiting to make a call on which team he can use better to become HC again.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
He could still become Falcons DC.
Falcons and Saints have the best shot of making playoffs next year. And after a good season and a win in playoff he can be on the list of candidates for HC.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 2:40 PM EST up reply actions
Two years
Even if Spags is hired, I think it will take two solid years as DC for him to be a hot HC candidate. It also depends on what openings are available and whether he would want to jump.
If we land Spags, I think AB throws a large bone his way and does what he can to get him to stay at least 2 years.
Or
after a crap season, he becomes our HC. We should throw that at him. ATL’s talent at his disposal would be enticing to him.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 17, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
DC
If your info is from Led, It was a false post.
Coaching wins championships!
by Edgecrusher211 on Jan 17, 2012 10:46 AM EST reply actions
Not From LED
Could be the same source which fed D Led. I don’t know his sources.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions
ORDERED
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Jan 17, 2012 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
why didn't they "order" MM to do the same?
It’s just me, it just seems like weird wording there
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
MM was a smug bastard. He would have ignored it and the new regime is not one to cut off it's nose to spite it's face
Basically, they wouldn’t fire someone mid season still in the playoff hunt.
by aces666high on Jan 17, 2012 11:31 AM EST up reply actions
My thing is:
will this be a Mike Peterson Jacksonville retread? Or a Brian williams Jacksonville retread?
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
We all knew the plays were there. We also knew the guy with the plays seemed to forget about them for half the game
A simple high school play like a screen would have made a world of difference this season w/our poor Oline play. Teams were constantly getting pressure in every area, left, right, middle, burrowing underground, etc. A screen executed more than once a game would have given them pause. “Are we getting into the backfield because this line sucks? Or is that little guy sneaking out of the backfield to do someth…dammit! he is doing something!”. Just like that, you have a few guys, sometimes more, completely out of the play, huffing and puffing after a guy 5-10 yards away. Next play, not so aggressive and a little tired. Repeat, repeat, repeat. Mix in a run or two and set up, well, everything!
So far our OC has said everything he should. He’s not going to overhaul the offense, just going to add a few things to in. Can’t wait to see it!
Steen Pass...Really???
What’s the big deal? I’ve never heard a professional football player or coach give credit to their successful execution of screen passes being the key to their winning a Super Bowl.
Falcon Fans UNITE!
by Blue Falcon on Jan 17, 2012 11:33 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
I'm just trying to point out things that will change for 2012...or at least hopefully
You’re right, they’re not going to win a Super Bowl with screen passes. But they might score a couple more touchdowns.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Jan 17, 2012 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
The big deal is is that it's a simple play that can take the pressure off a line,
Is yet another weapon to use and confuse defenses with and if you have the right person, which we do can be a demoralizing play when it’s broken for huge chunks of yardage. It’ll also mean less carries for MT in a season which means a much fresher Turner late in the year.
This is a domino type of play. It’ll help things fall into place. Sproles insane amount of catches helped keep Brees clean most of the season, which in turn opened up areas for Graham, Colston and co. It’s not a Super Bowl winning play but I’d rather go in knowing that we have a fully stacked deck.
by aces666high on Jan 17, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I'll rec that
a simple play like that can reduce pressure on our Oline (it would be insane to assume we can switch to a top tier Oline in just one season) and on Ryan (he does get nervous sometimes) – which should improve his long ball accuracy.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
I think the use of the screen
is a way to at the very least mask a bad Oline, or make an average one appear top-tier.
It's Great! To be! A Tennessee Vol!
If Smitty thinks that improving the screen game
Will take this team over the top. He is in trouble.
by pierre02 on Jan 17, 2012 11:33 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Improving the screen game is more than just screen passes, you know.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 17, 2012 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly. There are a lot of areas that were ignored by MM
Screens, actual design passes to RB’s and checkdowns to a certain extent were few and far between. What do those plays do? Pull defenses in closer to the LOS, opening things up for your Pro Bowl WR and future Pro Bowl WR.
Here are just a few guys who’s teams actually used them. Sproles 86 catches on 111 targets, 710 yards, 703 YAC. Arian Foster 53/71 617 yds, 635 YAC, Matt Forte 52/76, 490 yds, 451 YAC. I know these are front line guys in most downs but both Foster and Forte missed huge chunks of time and still put up those numbers.
What would you prefer? What we have been doing, 2 yard run on first down, yet another 2nd and long or screen play for 8, 2nd and 2? There’s so much more we can do w/that short yardage down. Take a shot downfield, mid range stuff, etc. Teams didn’t have to worry about this stuff against us, we have to start making teams have to gameplan for everything. The more they have to look at the thinner they’ll become.
by aces666high on Jan 17, 2012 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
It's just an obvious starting point
I think it’s going to be more than that, obviously. I listened to the media interview and a few things stood out:
- They’ll keep and fully utilize the no-huddle, and Dirk is a fan of it
- They will use all of the weapons the Falcons have
- They will look to make more downfield throws and get the ball in the hands of the playmakers
- They’ll use the screen a lot
Honestly, if they do those things, they’ll be doing exactly what many fans have been clamoring for. It’s not that Atlanta’s offense was terrible – it just never reached its potential (in my eyes anyways).
which had a domino effect
Of leaving our team on the field for LOOOONG stretches of time against good teams.
I'll say it because no one else has...
How much differently does this team play with Ovie Mughelli in the backfield? We lost Ovie Game 7 against the Lions.
We had 2 decent rush games (not counting the week 17 beatdown against the hapless Bucs and the laugh fest which was the Colts game) after he went down – and one of those was the heartbreaker at home against NO. We had 5 straight games of <100 yds rushing… and managed 64 yards against NYG.
Ovie is an asset in the screen game as well – whether he is receiving or whether he is the insurance that gived MR2 that extra split second to hit Snells/Rodgers/Weems behind the wall of blockers.
Do I think we win the division with Ovie? It was certainly possible. Take the 1st NO game and the Titans game, and I think we have it… and I think with Ovie, we have a good shot at beating the 49’ers.
Anyway, let’s see what Koetter can do with a 2nd year JJ, a more seasoned Quizz, and (hopefully) a better OL.
FB importance
The importance of the old FB position is disappearing. The classic lead-blocker is no longer as important as it once was, as offenses are now counting on the HB to provide blocks in passing situations and to also act as receiving options.
I love Ovie, but I think the Falcons offense is progressing in a way that he won’t be critical anymore. In fact, the numbers show that Turner gained more yards per rush in a single-back set.
which brings up a good point
Do we keep Ovie this year? If we are more comfortable and successful toward the end of the year in 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 back sets then do we need him? Trade him for picks or linemen something and resign Snelling.
It depends
That’s not to say a good FB can’t be important. They still have tremendous value in goal line situations for – gasp – fourth and short. Plus, they make very nice check down options when running a play action out of a two-back backfield.
I don’t think we could get enough for him in trade value – not even sure a team would be interested. But, I do think we keep him on the roster.
$3 Million next year
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
I'd love to see a less predictable play sequence
Something other than run, run, pass on downs 1 – 3 95% of the time
good writeup by dawson devitt
http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-falcons-fans/2012/01/16/falcons-fans-shocked-by-dirk-koetter-hire/
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
by walknbalk on Jan 17, 2012 12:15 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Agreed, that was good
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Jan 17, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
Dawson's been there a while.
I don’t know what he is, technically. Manager of the sports blog area, maybe.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 17, 2012 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
Here is my take on Dirk Koetter, Offensive Coordinator or DKOC for short…
After reading what I could find, listening to the interview courtesy of Jason’s post and finally reading through some of what has been said on here all I can say is I think there "may" be a little overreaction going on over this hire.
I mean it wasn’t a shock to me, I had heard his name being tossed around but most (as well as I) dismissed it.
I for one am going to give this guy a far shake just as I did MM. I know I was one of the more vocal ones calling for his head just before the midpoint of the season but I was also defending him in preseason and telling everyone "Let’s see what he can do with all his new weapons".
Well DKOC will get the same courtesy from me, I mean the team hasn’t taken "Snap One" under the man yet and so far I like what I am hearing and reading. Yes talk is cheap but he deserves a chance to put his money where his mouth is. Can he…we shall see!! I for one don’t really care what he did in college or with Jacksonville…I care what he does with MY TEAM…Period!!
But I for one am not going to condemn him before the 2012 offense even take’s a snap…but that’s just me!!
"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders
"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster
OT: but still so delicious
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
by walknbalk on Jan 17, 2012 12:19 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
rec'd
great stuff! LOL
loved this paragraph:
Winning only feels good because losing hurts. Doesn’t that make you feel better, Saints fans? I didn’t think so.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
it's ok...
come back in a few years after a few losing seasons, they’ll be back to wearing bags over their heads.
It's Great! To be! A Tennessee Vol!
Is it safe to say
maybe Archer was off his rocker a little bit? If they were ready to make an announcement, seems like they would have by now.
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Turner
Dont get me wrong, I like Turner, but if Dirk is looking to run more screens and go vertical more, and with Turner wearing down the last few games, I would think we might be able to trade Turner for a draft pick and get similar production from Quiz and Snelling. They are also more versatile.
by Magellan55 on Jan 17, 2012 12:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I Agree
Michael Turner has much to be appreciated for here in Atlanta. In all fairness he is one of the key reasons why this Franchise has turned into a annual quality football team. I love my 33 Jersey!
With that said its time for the Burner to move on…and I still believe he has a few quality season’s ahead. Predicatable! When Turner’s on the field the opposing Def knows what to expect and what not to expect. Which is the recipe for bland, boring under achieving offense.
This offense should not be built to feature Turner’s stregths.
If we trade Turner we could probably pick up a 3rd or 4th rounder…which we desperately need especially now that we have new cordinators!
Rise Up!
He's been awesome!
But we do need to (A) either throw him the ball some, or (B) move him while he has value so we can get a back that can catch so defenses can’t take it for granted that they don’t have to worry about that while facing us. Predictability is right.
Another Off Topic....
Four Players from the NFC South made the “The Pro Football Weekly/Pro Football Writers of America All-Rookie team” and three of them are from the Falcons: JJ, Bosher and Dent.
"I'd run over my own mother to win the Super Bowl." - Joe Jacoby, formerly of the Redskins
"To win, I'd run over Joe's mom too." - Matt Millen, formerly of the Raiders
"We now have exactly the same situation as we had at the start of the race, only exactly the opposite" - Murray Walker, Sportscaster
WHO THE HELL IS THE NEW DC?!?!
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 1:05 PM EST via mobile reply actions
the longer this goes, the better the chances of Spagsghetti
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
The longer this goes,
the better the chances my head will explode.
I wish the OC search had taken this long.
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 1:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I will sacrifice your head for Spags, no offense
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Which one?
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 1:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
whichever one is more meaningful to the sacrificial process. :)
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
I dont know
But I’m anxious to find out! If they know who it is, I doubt it’s Spags. I don’t think he’d reach a decision this quick. The longer the wait, the better our chances.
Coaching wins championships!
Some news on the DC front
The guys from 790 think its going to be Nolan. Remember Archer told 790 yesterday the pick was already in place.
"NLDS or bust" - Bobby Cox
We don't have to continue to settle Atlanta. We're better than that.
I think I'm hoping for Nolan.
He wears suits. Plus I have a feeling Spags would leave quicker.
Spags is probably the better fit, though.
Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.
by VaderX5 on Jan 17, 2012 2:26 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Dual Purpose Back
At some point, it would behoove the Falcons to get their hands on a dual purpose back, rather then a Turner (gonna run or block) as a starter like McCoy, Rice, Foster, etc.
by Whopper Dawg on Jan 17, 2012 2:01 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Singing the Blues
sigh
So, will we refer to Koetter by his name, as OC or by his initials… DK?
Was in an discussion about this problem with an old (Falcons) buddy of mine last night over a rum and coke or three. He thinks OC sounds too much like high school and the ‘Occupational Counselor’ (he ended up as an iron worker in a shipyard by the OC’s advice… making more than he cares to admit!).
Then the name, Koetter, which can be pronounced like Kotter or Keeter or Ketter… it’s gonna create some confusion for the booth apes calling the games.
DK? My buddy likes that because it can go two ways. It can be offensive/vulgar on a less than stellar Sunday or be modestly noncommittal on a better one.
After the third rum and soda, it all become funny and we laughed like the Falcs were still in the Super Bowl hunt and we were still 30 years old.
This morning, he had a headache… I did not because I stopped at four.
"There's nothing wrong with Florida that a rise in ocean level wouldn't cure."
Wouldn't that be too easy?
"There's nothing wrong with Florida that a rise in ocean level wouldn't cure."
a question
from someone who’s not a native English speaker – so what’s the right way to pronounce our new OC’s last name?
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
that was so 27 seconds ago
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
DL will announce a first!
New DC: Huginkis, Amanda
obviously DC means something different then
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Dirty Co-ed, clearly.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jan 17, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
Dled now saying "minutes not hours" until announcement
Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.
Not sure about DLed
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Jan 17, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions
Mike Nolan Is the DC
It's all about Process...

by 














