Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The Falcoholic's Atlanta Falcons Free Agent Targets: Carl Nicks

Throughout the off-season, The Falcoholic will point out free agents that its writers believe are good fits for the Falcons. Today, Carl Nicks.

What do you need to know about Carl Nicks, you might ask? Only three things, really.

Add that up and you get a guy the Falcons would probably love to steal, albeit one who won't come cheap. The Falcons struggled to find a right guard to start all year, losing Mike Johnson in the pre-season, starting Garrett Reynolds and then dumping him, starting Joe Hawley and kinda settling in with him but then turning to Sam Baker before going back to Hawley. When you consider that Hawley is a natural center and Todd McClure may not be returning, it makes sense to go get a guard.

You couldn't really do better than Nicks, and you'd take away one of the Saints' best linemen in the process. Nicks is an elite pass blocker and a plenty capable run blocker, and he's pretty mobile for a big guy. If you wanted to move him to left guard, you could (assuming the Falcons would/Blalock would agree) move Justin Blalock to right guard and have a fantastic tandem. Either way, he'd provide an immediate upgrade on the line, and that's something the team has mentioned as a priority.

What would it take to get Nicks? A lot of money is the short answer, and the long answer is it's tough to tell. He's the crown jewel of the market and it'll take multiple years and potentially close to double digits per year to lock him down. Given that I think he should be at the top of the Falcons' free agent list this year, I'm willing to pull the trigger on almost anything short of the ridiculous. This is all dependent on the Saints not using the franchise tag on Nicks, which would seem likely given that Drew Brees and Marques Colston are also FAs.

So there's my #1 free agent wish. What do you think of signing Nicks?

Comment 81 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Obviously this would be a great upgrade

But this is a huge departure from our current thinking on the offensive line. Smithitroff seem to prefer drafting and developing an offensive line, using later round picks and undrafted free agents. Signing the top FA guard for 9 million a year is a TON of money, and not even at the more elite position of LT where we also have uncertainty brewing. I’m not so sure they don’t sign a cheaper LT and try to force T-Rex arms into the RG position, where his run blocking might really shine (throwing him there mid season was a mistake, lets see what an offseason of training can do).

by TheAreopagite on Jan 16, 2012 12:07 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Your right about the coaching staff drafting and grooming first

But I think a lot of there philosophies change this year (see post season conference). It’s all about urgency to get a ring. That’s why I could see them getting him. On the other hand they still like to pick no names with potential no one else sees (see new o coordinater).

Shi@t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by JJWatt1stfalconspick on Jan 16, 2012 12:12 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Departure,yes.But isn't that the problem with where we are today

I don’t know if anyone has noticed but,the top 2 supposed QBs are out of the playoffs while,the 4 best Olines and 3 best defensive front sevens are still in.The arrow is pointing sharply up for those franchises that maniacally invest 1st and 2nd round draft picks,year after year, on the Olines and defensive front sevens.Those are the teams that are gaining on us and have surpassed us.And closer in the rear view mirror than anyone wants to admit,here come the Seahawks,Lions,Bears,Bills,Dolphins,Rams and Bengals.

We cannot move forward if we continue to put a lesser premium and priority on both our lines of scrimmage play than our top competition.Contrary to most of the analysis that you will read and hear,football is still first and foremost a line of scrimmage game.For the most part,QBs,WRs,and DBs flourish as a result of competitive play on the lines.

The Falcons are hanging by a thread, onto its place in the top 3rd of the NFL.Signing Nicks,even if we have to slightly overpay,would be a major step in the right direction.

by dawg1060 on Jan 20, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

This would make up for no 1st round pick.

I hope we have the wallet open and ready to go.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 16, 2012 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

Blank doesn't care about spending money

This would definitely make up for the 1st we lost. I hope AB is ready to spend money this off season.

by pierre02 on Jan 16, 2012 12:26 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

It's not necessarily about spending money

It’s about getting a contract that will fit under the salary cap. We have a ton of important free agents of our own to resign, and we’ll need to replace those that leave via free agency. I expect there may also be a few casualties who the front office feel have not lived up to their contracts and must also be replaced. With all of that going on, I doubt we can compete for someone who is likely to command a record contract for a non left tackle offensive lineman.

I hope I’m wrong.

by jcaustic on Jan 16, 2012 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

This would be the best possible FA we could get

Unfortunately, I don’t see the Saints letting him go without putting up a major fight. Especially if we were the team they were bidding against. Seems like it will end up a lot like Charles Johnson did last off season.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

The Saints have a lot of financial decisions to make.

If I recall correctly, Nicks, Colston, and Brees all need paid. That’s a metric S-ton of cash.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 16, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

True, but

I’m not sure how you let one of your Pro-Bowl level guards go unless you have a ton of confidence in his back up. I also wouldn’t be surprised to see Brees make the same type of decision that Manning made with his contract in order to keep the best possible team on the field.

Not to mention, he may also love being in NO that would give them a definite edge in any negotiations.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Who would love living underwater?

Atlanta is above sea level! Advantage: Atlanta!

But seriously, I hope we make a REALLY big effort to get this guy.

I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by Duff_Man on Jan 16, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, me too

Would easily be the best FA signing since Turner.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

ehhh

I’d be thrilled if we get him and he ends up even third best after Turner and Gonzo

Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia

by Gemini-RU on Jan 16, 2012 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

nit-pick

Tony G was aquired via trade

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Jan 16, 2012 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

my bad

I always thought he was a free agent. thanks.

Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia

by Gemini-RU on Jan 17, 2012 3:51 AM EST up reply actions  

He WAS our 2nd round pick that year

He has been one of the best and most consistent 2nd round picks in Falcons History, if you look at it from that perspective.

by Mnemonic on Jan 17, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Win- win

We get a great guard, or we hamstring a division rival with a contract that we drove the price up on.

by TheAreopagite on Jan 16, 2012 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I don't see them paying Colston.

Between their HBs, WRs, and TEs, they’ve got plenty of pass catchers.

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

This

If I’m the Saints, I pick Brees and Nicks over Colston. But Nicks may not give them a choice depending on the market.

by kman_722 on Jan 16, 2012 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes kman

That is definitely what the Saints should do.However,what we don’t know is whether they think they have an up and coming talent,on the roster,to take his place.We think that Mike Johnson is that developing talent for us.But,we have more than one slot to improve in order to be competitive.

by dawg1060 on Jan 20, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Difference here between Carolina last year,

New Orleans doesn’t have 60 mil in cap space. They can’t get into a bidding war with us, because we will win.

Before signing Brees they are at 94 million. Brees will probably get around 15-20 mil a year at minimum. They still have to sign a number of other players, and have a solid line already. I strongly feel we could persuade him to come to Atlanta.

by Whyte Bler 000 on Jan 16, 2012 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

this would be great but

Even if we cant get nicks if he proves too expensive hopefully we can get a player that has his type of capability.

by Mr. W on Jan 16, 2012 12:59 PM EST reply actions  

git er dun!

Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.

by walknbalk on Jan 16, 2012 12:59 PM EST reply actions  

Rec'd

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd too

Great post. I was actually wondering what our cap figure looked like. This actually gives me a lot more hope for trying to sign Nicks. I’m sure there will be a lot of competition for him, but I think we’ll have a good shot at it now.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree we have more financial room then the Saints

But we still have our own salary cap issues. Resigning Curtis Lofton is key. Abraham is an integral part of our defense. It would be nice to see Grimes back, but he might be out of our price range. I still feel like if Nicks was such an important asset to us this year, we would have made a greater effort to resign Harvey Dahl last year. I would not be a fan of signing a big, free agent offensive lineman.

"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham

by sportsfan4life2012 on Jan 16, 2012 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

It's one thing to prefer that the Falcons go in a different direction.

But it’s another to imply that they won’t have the financial capabilities of making this signing, and in the same breath make it seem like the Saints will have less of an issue signing Hicks to a contract. Also, if the Falcons’ change to a defensive scheme, Grimes may no longer be as great of a fit as he was under Van Gorder. His skill set fit our old scheme perfectly, which had a lot to do with how productive he was. I’m not saying he’s not a legitimate player, but like most players in the NFL, he works best in a specific scheme. I like Franks, and if we’re asking our corners to play press-man coverage, I’ll be content to go into next season with him as a starter.

I look at it like this. The Falcons are firmly entranced in “win now” mode. Their window is in danger of closing. Without a question, the most glaring weakness on our team is the offensive line. That’s not to say it’s the only weakness, but there’s not another unit on our team that lacks talent as much as our O-line. We obviously can’t afford to let anybody develop, because we need to win now, and if we have the funds to bring in a proven pro-bowl caliber super-stud like Nicks, then it’d be foolish not to do so.

Unless, of course, there’s some unheralded player out there that can match his value at a fraction of the cost. Until somebody points that player out to me, I’ll believe that Nicks needs to be priority #1 for the Falcons if he does in fact reach free agency.

This is my corn. You people are guests in my corn.

by gilley on Jan 16, 2012 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't implying the Saints have less of an issue, as they clearly do

However this article states that the Saints are not in as much trouble as we may think. I am saying the Falcons have other needs, and Nicks, in my opinion, would be a luxury more than a necessity. The Falcons have, give or take, around $24 million to spend. Lofton will likely get anywhere between five to seven million a year. Abe is looking at seven to nine. That leaves us around ten million for our other needs, a figure that would be mostly filled by bringing in Nicks. By spending so many draft picks to draft Julio Jones, this team needs depth more than ever, and spending it on a few players will hurt this team now and in the long run.

"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham

by sportsfan4life2012 on Jan 16, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

We're obviously in a 'win now window', but

that’s at least partially due to the fact that we were in one in 2007. We had traded away a first rounder for Abe (Coleman was here too), and had hired he-whose-name-shall-not-be-typed to bring Vick and Co into a championship-level offense. We had brought in Joe Horn, and had just drafted JA98 to be the bookend to Abe.

Then there was the apocalypse 2007.

That’s what TD inherited, a team in a win-now window with no QB. Then he cut a bunch of talent: Coleman, Dunn (at his own request), Alge, mother f’ing Wayne Gandy, Kynan Forney, and traded MeHall.

Most teams would have then entered a rebuilding phase, but drafting a franchise QB kept us viable. The current stock of UFAs is a result of that previous Vick/Arkansas Coach window closing

I don’t think the current window is “in danger of closing,” but we might be in for a transitional year as the statuses of Grimes, Abe, and Lofton are in limbo and we can’t/won’t resign all of them.

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agree that the window is not in danger of closing

Teams with that philosophy make stupid financial decisions (see Atlanta Hawks/Joe Johnson contract). I want the Falcons to put the best team possible on the field while being within the strains of the salary cap. I think Nicks is a great player, but the opportunity cost of signing Nicks is too high IMO

"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham

by sportsfan4life2012 on Jan 16, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

What are you basing that on?

I understand what you guys are trying to say, but the reality is that the NFL is not like MLB. Our understandings of the financial obligations for any one team is not great, and the intricacies of the salary cap and the way that contracts are guaranteed or not guaranteed, and can therefore be partially if not completely nullified if the team chooses to make it so, prevents any of us from truly knowing whether or not the Falcons can legitimately make a run at this guy.

I just don’t buy that any of us can really say that Nicks is out of our price range, or even that that signing him would be detrimental in the form of preventing us from signing/retaining other players. To say outright that signing him would be a bad decision is to pretend that you have a greater knowledge of the Falcons’ financial obligations than you actually do.

This is my corn. You people are guests in my corn.

by gilley on Jan 17, 2012 7:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Nicks is a much better player than Dahl

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Jan 16, 2012 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

And it's not even close

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

That would be great

if we could land that dude. I think you meant unlikely that the Saint’s would use the franchise tag on him, but I am not so sure. They won’t need it on Brees, they will easily reach an agreement there, Peyton and Brees are a match made in heaven. Colston vs Nicks, I think Nicks gets the tag. All Pro guards are harder to find than quality WRs and Brees makes a good WR look great with ball placement.

by Whopper Dawg on Jan 16, 2012 1:13 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, admittedly I'm sinking a lot of hope on the franchise tag going to Brees

It absolutely would transform this offensive line, though, so I’ve gotta hope.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Dave

Man you dream a lot but I like it. LOL

by BigFalcon84 on Jan 16, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

That's what being a fan is all about!

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought someone was reporting on ESPN

yesterday that NO planned on using the Franchise tag on Brees. They made a comment that this meant they couldn’t use it on Colston or Nicks. Maybe I was dreaming, but that’s what I thought I heard.

by drmondo667 on Jan 16, 2012 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I wonder what the franchise tag on him would cost them.

That would be a smart move on their part, but only if they have enough cap room to pull it off. I see Brees getting resigned in the off season and things falling into place based on that deal.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know the acctual number,

but IIRC, Guard is one of those positions where most starters get a small amount, but those top 5 guys are better paid than at most positions. In other words, the difference between the tag salary and the avg position salary is more than at most positions.

Not sure what that means for the Saints and our odds of getting him, though.

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Problem with the Tag is

it all counts against the Cap, and they are pretty tight as it is without having Brees under contract yet. When Mankins was tagged last year it was I think 10 mil, and I would expect it to be similar which is a huge cap it. I don’t think they could afford that much of their cap just on guards as Evans just got a big contract .

by Hutch11 on Jan 16, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand too

and it would be great to get him. But the tag usually gets applied in a contentious situation where a longer term agreement can’t be reached. I don’t see that being the situation with Brees. He and Peyton are good for each other, have it going real well and I am sure Brees feels some loyalty given the Saints took a chance on him after his shoulder injury.

Glad you brought it up, I will be watching how this develops with interest.

Failing Nicks, who else would be a good FA addition to the line?

by Whopper Dawg on Jan 16, 2012 1:26 PM EST reply actions  

I'm just starting to look at offensive linemen for future posts

So someone else might have a better grasp on the market. There’s gotta be upgrades.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Only other o-line

the comes to mind is the one the isn’t Yanda in Baltimore, whoever their other Guard is. Can’t remember his name but I herd he is pretty good.

by Hutch11 on Jan 16, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Ben Grubbs?

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Grubbs would be an upgrade without question.

And probably a heck of a lot more cap friendly. If Nicks hits the market he’s gonna be like pork bellies in Trading Places….caliente.

by Kushion on Jan 16, 2012 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Mike Johnson was an All-American at Bama

I just wonder whats the deal with this kid.

by Kushion on Jan 16, 2012 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

If he's healthy in 2012, he might be a quality starter

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel like we've lost this roll of the die before,

but yeah, this might be the best option. I’d feel much better about it if we had a solid LT.

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Johnson was on IR all year.

He was the primary reason they thought they could afford to not resign Harvey Dahl.2011 was meant to have been the beginning of a plan to become younger and more athletic on the Oline.The early season ending injury to Johnson, then the early Baker injury set the plan into a tailspin.Baker was poor at best when he returned,Hawley was up and down,and Garrett Reynolds is not ready but is too young to declare a bust.

Add the lockout and no offseason and it was just a bad scenario for the beginning of a youth movement.

by dawg1060 on Jan 20, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

If Nicks doesn't come on board, I'd go Grubbs

He’s been banged up a bit, is my only concern.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Jan 16, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd be happy with either

But I think an upgrade at guard is the more important than the tackles. Look at the Saints only mediocre tackles(that somehow got into the probowl?) yet he always has all day to pass because of such little pressure up the middle, he can always step up to avoid the edge rushers

by Hutch11 on Jan 16, 2012 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Another consideration

We always seem to burn out free agency with a top-dollar acquisition. Sometimes it works (for a few years) like Michael Turner, other times we are saddled with players being paid well in excess of their value (Robinson and Edwards). Maybe multiple, mid to low level acquisitions like Hayden might be more prudent.

by TheAreopagite on Jan 16, 2012 1:34 PM EST reply actions  

Not sure I would put Edwards there just yet

True he didn’t have the season the fans expected but given the knee surgery he had last off season and how he got better towards the end of the season, I’m willing to see how he does next season.

Robinson though, oh yeah…. not nearly worth the money. I still think we should cut him and give Grimes his money.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think he's a bad player

But would you really disagree that he’s being paid well in excess of his value?

by TheAreopagite on Jan 16, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

At the moment, no

But I think given the potential it’s not too much. I’m just a little leery of putting him and Dunta in the same category since Dunta’s a known quantity at this point.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I think DR is fine as a bump-and-run CB

but we’ve been running a soft zone almost exclusively. Much like the comment about Grimes maybe benefitting from our scheme, the argument can be made about DR being hurt by the scheme. Nnamdi Asamugha is a great man corner who was forced to play zone and looked like a bust too.

by drmondo667 on Jan 16, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

somehow

TD and his staff do a very good job in selecting top-dollar FAs on offense - Turner and Gonzo being examples. And they don’t do nearly as well in selecting players for defense in FA – Dunta and RE (to a slightly lower degree since it’s been just 1 year).

anyone notice the trend? or is it just a coincidence?

Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia

by Gemini-RU on Jan 16, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Gonzo was a trade not a FA signing.

by birdwatch on Jan 16, 2012 1:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

yes

just clarified it for myself. I thought he was a FA all along. still, that doesn’t change my idea – TD was good in bringing in big name offensive talent.

Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia

by Gemini-RU on Jan 17, 2012 3:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Can we blame BVG?

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Cb

You could get simone like Finnigen from the Titans who odd more shut down than Robinson

by Sinafi on Jan 16, 2012 1:43 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

fail. lol

Braves.
Falcons.
Gamecocks.

by walknbalk on Jan 16, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I would like to see us pick up Jason Jones

As long as we didn’t have to break the bank to get him I could see him being a good upgrade on the D line.

by ErrantFalcon on Jan 16, 2012 1:48 PM EST reply actions  

I'm all up for signing this guy

The most important thing about an oline is to keep the front clean so a qb can step up, side pressure is easy to avoid. We seen it this year hawley kept getting bulled into ryan therefore leaving him no room to step up. We also better pray we hit on a LT somewhere in the draft. Finally i think we need to resign HD and Lofton maybe beerman and pick up either Laron Landry,Michael Griffin, or Mario Williams if we dont resign abe. BTW keep dunta you will all see him do work this year with our new DC trust me

by Nedk23 on Jan 16, 2012 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

very interesting possibility

But like you said, it would take a TON of money. I’m pretty much hoping they go into the off-season with the same mentality about the O-Line that they did when they traded up for Julio (fix the glaring problem at almost any cost).

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Jan 16, 2012 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Jeff Duncan of the New Orleans Times-Picayune expects the Saints to franchise tag impending free agent Drew Brees.
Behind Brees, Duncan expects New Orleans’ top-three free agent priorities to be LG Carl Nicks, WR Marques Colston, and CB Tracy Porter. In an “ideal” scenario, the Saints would extend Brees and Colston, and slap the tag on Nicks. The team’s failure to extend Brees during the season, however, could very well lead to him getting the tag and either Colston or Nicks walking.

by Kushion on Jan 16, 2012 3:50 PM EST reply actions  

We have neglected the o line for a long time

Last first round O lineman before we moved up for Sam Baker was 1993 Lincoln Kennedy and 1992 Bob Whitfield it would be nice to have a pair like that back.

by Rippers on Jan 16, 2012 3:57 PM EST reply actions  

...which of these is not like the others?

Perilously close to a 2007 style depression.

by VaderX5 on Jan 16, 2012 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Would definitely make up for no first round pick

But i’ll laugh if we get him and all of a sudden he mysteriously gets called for all those holds.

by Turner_The_Burner on Jan 16, 2012 10:28 PM EST reply actions  

That's not going to happen

Look at how we turned out after Dahl left and Nicks is way better than him

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 17, 2012 11:32 AM EST reply actions  

saints will resign

Atlanta will win a championship....someday

by maxxj3 on Jan 17, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

NOT GOING TO HAPPEN

OG it’s manageable in my opinion, LT Demetrius Bell from Bills is a better option and most needed position.

by D Fatigue on Jan 17, 2012 1:04 PM EST reply actions  

I think your spot on Mr. Dave i would sign him in a heart beat

He is clearly one of the best offensive line men out there on the market John Clayton of espn thinks the saints will resign Colstin and either resign Brees or franchise him and both of those signings will cost them a lot of money Clayton thinks Nicks will probably get a lot of attention on the market and likely sign elsewhere i hope he is right and the falcons can jump on this opportunity.

CORONATION STARSCREAM?THIS IS BAD COMEDY!! WILL ANYONE ELSE ATTEMPT TO FILL HIS SHOES?-GALVATRON

by falconpower on Jan 17, 2012 2:03 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Falcoholic Primer

Where Falcons fans come to roost.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Falcoholic_icon_small
Never too early to........
Small
Third Down Pass Defense: Mike Nolan Edition
Small
Ryan vs Brees/Manning/Brady: Why Ryan Can be an Elite QB
Small
Third Down Sacks: Mike Nolan Edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lofton Wants A Championship
Mass-effect-3-hd-wallpaper-3_small
Atlanta’s Tight End of the future is….
Small
The Pro Bowl Changes
Small
The Screen Pass and Matt Ryan
Barnabas_collins_250x250_small
Should the Falcons pursue Kellen Winslow?
Small
Facons Pass rush

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Baron Of All He Blogs

Thefalcoholic_small Dave Choate

Marquises Of Musings

Newprofile_small Adam Schultz

Bear-woodsjpg-ee4252752e478b73_large_small James Rael

205892_10150259660296336_683626335_7946790_3837839_n_small Caleb Rutherford

Earls of Typing

181614_735189801813_23210129_40578364_6784501_n_small Jason Kirk

Img_0301_small Jeanna Thomas

40564a_small Alex Welch