Sizing Up The Seahawks: All Defense, No Offense
Thus far, the Seattle Seahawks have played good defense and awful offense. Can't put it more simply than that.
On paper, this is the best matchup the Atlanta Falcons have had all season. The Falcons are certainly not looking past the Seahawks, not with a 1-2 record and three shaky performances to kick off 2011. So they'll storm into Qwest Field, one of the loudest stadiums in all the land, and bring three weeks' worth of hard lessons with them.
This is the most winnable game the Falcons play this month, and losing this putts them in a horrible position with rough tilts against the Green Bay Packers and Detroit Lions on the way. The Seahawks have weaknesses the Falcons can exploit, and we've got to hope they do just that.
Frankly, if the Falcons can protect Matt Ryan and put a hurting on Tarvaris Jackson--who has been sacked 14 times despite good mobility--they can walk away with a win. It may be as simple as that.
Let's zoom in on the game. After the jump, find my biggest question, three smaller ones and a prediction.
The Biggest Question
Can the Seahawks' defense take advantage of a struggling Falcons' offensive line? It's a fair question.
As bad as the Seahawks have been this season on offense (30th in passing, 29th in rushing), they've been pretty damn good on defense (10th against the pass, 13th against the rush). They've piled up five sacks, ten pass deflections, four forced fumbles and two interceptions. Aside from young cornerback Brandon Brower and his merry men in the secondary, who have gotten abused, the Seahawks have put a pretty solid D on the field.
That's not great news for the Falcons, whose struggles in pass protection are legendary at this point. The line could be shaken up this week depending on what happens in practice, but it's unlikely we'll see a dramatic improvement in just one week's time. That leaves the team susceptible to guys like Chris Clemons, who has gotten two sacks thus far this season.
If the Falcons ever wanted to get Ovie Mughelli and Reggie Kelly more involved in blocking, this would be the week to do it. If they wanted to get Jacquizz Rodgers more involved in the passing game to give Ryan an outlet, this would be the week to do it. If they wanted to pad Matt Ryan's uniform with bubble wrap...you get the idea.
I think it's fair to say that this is going to be a major factor in the game ahead.
Three Smaller Questions
Question 1: Will the Falcons do to Tarvaris Jackson what the Bears, Eagles and Buccaneers have done to Ryan?
Jackson is nobody's idea of a world-beater, but he's decently mobile and can methodically move an offense. He cannot work miracles, however, and he really can't do anything spectacular if John Abraham is wearing his uniform all day.
So it becomes imperative to get a pass rush going. Without Jonathan Babineaux in the picture, Peria Jerry, Abe, Kroy Biermann and Ray Edwards will have to provide most of the push, since our linebackers and safeties do minimal effective blitzing. If those guys up front can show up and turn the heat up on Jackson, it's not like the Seahawks have a dominant running game to counter it.
Question 2: Can the Falcons abuse the Seahawks' cornerbacks?
The answer to this is an emphatic yes. The Seahawks have a borderline elite young safety in Earl Thomas, but the rest of their secondary careens between young, promising and not there yet to burnt toast.
The Falcons have way too many resources with which to exploit that. They have Roddy White, they have Julio Jones, Harry Douglas, Tony Gonzalez, Jacquizz Rodgers...a ton of weapons, in short. The Seahawks have put together pretty good team numbers, but with the exception of the Cardinals, teams have had very little trouble moving the football down the field against them.
Look for White and Jones, in particular, to continue to heat up. White's route-running makes him nearly impossible to sock away all game for even the best cornerbacks, and Jones is beginning to show the superhuman athleticism that caused we fans to collectively swoon over him back in April. This is linked back to our biggest question, of course, but if Ryan has any time to throw and guys get open, this one could be a bloodbath.
On the flip side, the Seahawks have a handful of talented young receivers—I'm a big fan of Doug Baldwin already—but the secondary should be able to handle them.
Question 3: Can Matt Bosher punt well?
Last week, we saw some good things from Bosher. He is among the most capable and most willing tacklers I've ever seen at the position. He finally boomed a handful of kickoffs into the end zone, which allayed one of the major concerns I've had with him up until this point.
Yet he still can't punt. The team has made its share of excuses for him, and I have no doubt that they still believe in his promise. I have no doubt that Bosher has faith in his abilities, and is working hard to figure out what's going on. But it doesn't matter when your punt average is the most anemic in the NFL, when you can't pin teams deep in their own territory and when you're one of the big reasons your team loses the field position battle every week.
The Seahawks are going to need some help, but they're not so inept that they can't punish the Falcons for giving them short fields. I like Bosher and want to see him punting for the Falcons for a long time to come. For that to happen, he's got to start improving.
No time like the present.
Prediction
I'm seeing the Falcons walking away from Seattle with this one. Let's say 35-20. That's just the kind of win this team needs.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Must win
IMHO: since their transition to “explosive” passing offense has been so painful they choose to forget it for a while, fix OL for running game, “turn to Turner”, eat time of possession and overpower Seahowks 21-17.
I Agree
Pound it early and often. Matt needs a rest after the beating he’s been taking.
Running game is not the opposite of explosive
If we can establish a good running game, it makes explosive plays possible. A good running game can do the following:
- Setup a believable play action, making linebackers bite and opening up slot routes
- Force one or both safeties to cheat up, forcing corners into single coverage
- Wear out a defense, forcing them into more mistakes and weaker coverage
I think we absolutely need to turn the ball over to Turner, but the irony is that is done BETTER out of the No-Huddle offense, where our running game is actually more productive, gaining far more yards per carry and being less predictable.
Agree with needing to establish the running game
but that does not mean “up the middle. Up the middle. Long pass. Punt”. We still need to be creative in the playcalling and formation choices.
Falcons need to get the running game going. They can be "explosive" off of play action...
Also, let’s see if the Falcs D can finish off plays. Make the tackles at the initial point of contact, instead of the whiff, then finally,the tackle 7 yards later down the field…
I have no vampire experience, but I have hunted werewolves. I shot one once, but by the time I got there, it had turned back into my neighbor's dog.
twitter.com/technomonk13
If, and that's a big if, the answer to the big question is no
Then the answer the question #3 shouldn’t matter, because the answer to question #2 is yes as long as the answer to the big question is no, therefore question #3 should be negated as Seattle should be unable to stop our offense. If you can understand what I just wrote please explain it to me.
In regards to question #1 I say yes because from what little I’ve seen of Seattle, Jackson tends to rely on his mobility a little too much and that can get him in trouble.
Wow, that was convoluted...
I think I understand it, though. You’re basically saying if the Hacks defense can’t maul our offensive line like everyone else has, Bosher won’t have to punt. Good point.
Yep I didn't intend for it to be that bad
but after I wrote it I thought it was funny so I left it alone.
Actually I enjoyed it
A puzzle…sort of like trying to figure out how our o-line went south so quickly, but simpler.
Obviously, the interactive flow chart didn't get posted, as i'm sure this all comes together when packaged properly.
I have no vampire experience, but I have hunted werewolves. I shot one once, but by the time I got there, it had turned back into my neighbor's dog.
twitter.com/technomonk13
by Heath13 on Sep 30, 2011 8:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Dave, I like Bosher, too
Personally. I just hated the 6th round PICK. And as I’ve pointed out before, with a 35.7 punt average, he ranks 33rd in the NFL, among 32 teams. In other words, one team has TWO guys punting better than Bosher.
I’d like nothing better than to see him succeed, and prove he was worth the pick. That said, I noted your quote:
The team has made its share of excuses for him
Can you share the excuses? I missed those down here in the hinterlands.
6th Pick on a Punter?
Isn’t that what the Arena League is for?
Just the occasional
“We told him to punt like that.”
“Matt’s learning.”
They’ve avoided drawing too much attention to him, I think, because of what he’s doing on the field. But they’re trying to protect their investment.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
Those seem like typical...
teams answers. As far as the team avoiding drawing too much attention…no need, his play is doing that all on its own!!
As with the other issues going on with the team right now, I too hope that this issue resolves itself and it REALLY is the jitters or nervousness or learning curve, etc. Be that as it may, I don’t believe the team can let it go on much longer as it stands now.
Just my thoughts…
April 1974 - Tug McGraw, when asked if he preferred grass or AstroTurf: "I don't know. I never smoked AstroTurf."
by Blood_Talon on Sep 30, 2011 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He put in a pretty good tackle on a guy last week?
Admittedly, when your punter is putting in TD-saving tackles, it tends to imply that either his kick was awful or the rest of the guys on Special Teams aren’t doing their jobs. Or both.
Um. Yeah. That’s all I got.
I tried to only say nice things about Bosher last week
All I could come up with was, he tackles well. Occasionally,, that is a good thing. But not too often.
Get some confidence Back.
This is a good game to get the confidence and swagger back. I think we will see an angry and nasty OL in this game.
It's all about Process...
Had a dream last night
That Quizz had a 95 yard touchdown run, but roddy and turner were out of the game.
Lets hope half of that is true
I think the team
needs a 35-10/14 blowout. this game does not need to be close and we need to get the offense going. pass rush has still not been very good, despite acquiring Ray Edwards, so we need to get that going too. we should not give up more than 14 points to a pedestrian Seahawks offense, and we should have no problem scoring 35 on them if our offense can finally click. i mean, we scored it on the Eagles so we really should be able to do it against the Seahawks.
In order for me to feel comfortable...
I want to see the offense finally get on track. This includes but is not limited to….Ryan being protected, no or very little turnovers, Turner running hard, (which would) open the down field passing attack. I want to see the defense create turnovers, get sacks, stop the run, and our secondary NOT get toasted.
In other words, I want to see the Falcons dominate. They have the talent to do so and they need to do it to build confidence and swagger so that we can inflict some payback on Green Bay in the Dome next week and go on to take our rightful place as the greatest football team ever!!!! But really just a win in the post season would be a nice start.
GO FALCONS
I would like
this game to be like the 2010 Arizona game. a game after a terrible game which we could still have won, a game that lifts us above all the doubts…a blowout win.
and to those who say it’s hard to win a west coast game for an east coast team – just check the Falcons record in that department starting 2008. I can’t say the details, but I think we… won all of the games. and all 3 games – @SEA, @OAK and @SD were blowouts or near blowouts. in other words, travel is not the issue.
but I have a feeling it will be another tough game. he’re my prediction – we win, but win ugly. a 20-17 win would be fine.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
It's Time
Let this explosive offense go this Sunday. Turner, White, Gonzalez, and Jones should get a lot of yards this week. O-Line needs to mask their flaws through some half decent schemeing by Mularkey . Am I the only one who finds it funny that Mularkey is an old expression that was used when calling bulls#@$ and that is kind of how you would describe his playcalling. Then let Ryan take over no-huddle a lot sooner.
by CombatFalcoholic on Sep 30, 2011 2:42 PM EDT reply actions
hit the nail on the head
I think the Falcons DO NOT blow the seahawks out.
The Seahawks may have quietly one of the best defenses in the NFL next to Tennessee.
Only gave up 19 points to the Niners (four field goals) while the special teams whiffed late in the game.
Then gave up 24 points on the road to an angry steeler team that should have scored more.
Then to Arizona’s revamped offense only 10 points
With the way the Falcons have struggled on offense I feel that it will be closer matchup like maybe a 17-14 win.

by 


















