Mike Smith: Competition Is Coming For The Falcons
Mike Smith's Monday press conference was about the same as it ever is, with one notable exception.
Smith expressed befuddlement at the team's performance. He acknowledged the need to improve significantly. He threw a bone to Todd McClure, praising him in spite of his botched snap during the Buccaneers game. Smitty also busted out the obvious "we did some things well and other things poorly," as you can see here.
What was different and a little ominous for those players tuning in at home was Smith's assertion that "there's competition at all spots." There's always the chance that it's just bluster and we're going to see exactly the same 22 starters out there on offense and defense. Given the performance we all just watched, though, I'm not so sure that's true.
You don't have to be some sort of levitating super genius to figure out something's wrong in Offensivelinetown. Between the penalties, the tiny screw ups and a complete lack of what you and I might refer to longingly as blocking, the Falcons haven't failed at protection so thoroughly since 2007. Couple that with Michael Turner's dismal performance and you have what writers the world over like to call the last straw.
So the question really isn't will they? The question is whether any of the backups on the offensive line can play well enough in practice this week to seize a starting job, however temporarily. That's an open-ended question for a few reasons:
- Will Svitek is not better than Sam Baker. Sorry, we've been down this road before.
- Justin Blalock has been the team's best lineman. Period.
- Joe Hawley is not beating out Todd McClure. The cagey veteran would maul Mike Smith like a bear if he tried to replace him.
- Garrett Reynolds would seem to be the most vulnerable, but Mike Johnson has been declared inactive in all three games thus far this season. Something tells me he's not going to get much of a shot.
- Will Svitek is not better than Tyson Clabo. I doubt the Falcons bring up anybody off the practice squad, either.
If there's any turnover at other positions, it's probably minimal. Thomas DeCoud seems to have reaffirmed his hold on the starting free safety job, and despite some early struggles Ray Edwards isn't going to ride the pine all game in favor of Kroy Biermann. The starters, for better or for worse, are locked in.
So ultimately, while it would be unfair of me to impugn Smith's honesty, you're probably going to see the same lineup again against the Seahawks. Let's hope they raise their collective game.
Your thoughts?
109 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Spot on...
The only way we can have genuine competition on the line, it’s going to be through Free Agency, new blood coming in. I honestly don’t know whose out there though, and then how long they’d take getting up to speed.
So yeah, overall… no change.
how about
A oline shakeup. Clabo to left tackle. Reynolds to right tackle. Johnson or hawley to right guard
by NewAgeDirtyBirdFan on Sep 27, 2011 7:41 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
it might make it even worse
oline is the unit where cohesion is far above individual talent
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
by Gemini-RU on Sep 27, 2011 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
How could the cohesion be any worse than it is right now?
by NewAgeDirtyBirdFan on Sep 27, 2011 3:10 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
its like cooking some new dish
you won’t know how it ends up tasting until its cooked. and if you tasted something awful it doesn’t mean this time around it won’t be even worse.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
Will Svitek isn't better than Sam Baker
But Max Starks is. Work him out. Sign him.
by TheAreopagite on Sep 27, 2011 7:47 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Good idea...
I would drag him in, to me, between him and Clabo, we’d have two very solid tackles. We know that McClure can do the job, Blalock is fine, and Reynolds would have a lot less pressure on him.
Makes sense to me…
Interesting idea.
While I’m sure there is a reason why the Steelers cut him, its hard to imagine him doing much worse then Baker. Question of cap space and what he would be willing to sign for.
Reeeeaaaaaccccchhhhh
don’t dislocate your arm on that stretch.
He has always been serviceable in a line that gets a lot more credit than it should b/c of Roethlisberger. Add to the fact that 32 teams (including the Steelers who need OLinemen like woah) didn’t think he could give much (either b/c he never was good or his neck injury), and I don’t think there are any easy answers sitting on a couch somewhere.
by KMarch on Sep 27, 2011 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Why Not?
Honestly, I guess you can look at it two ways. This is a key game for us to get back on track with our starters playing seahawks, or It may be the best time to try a Will Svitek even if it is for just one game and put a fire in Baker. If we were playing another team besides seahawks I probably wouldn’t be this enthusiastic.
This
My sentiments exactly. If we were playing the Aints or a contender, I’d be loathe to shake things up, but against the Seahawks? We can probably afford the risk, if only to make a statement.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Sep 27, 2011 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm starting to think
Dahl was the key I think we made a mistake man, besides Reynolds is 6’7 he should be playing tackle I think we should switch him and baker…just a thought???? At 6’7 his size would be an advantage over DEs much like bryannt mikinnie.< I spelled that way wrong. But I’m referring to the 6’8 tackle of the ravens.
by falcons101 on Sep 27, 2011 8:18 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
Reynolds has all of 2 games of experience
Of which he was dominated in both games. What makes you think he’ll be able to make the transition from guard to LT, where he’ll be matched up with the most explosive player on the opposing team’s dline? I’m thinking the only thing they might try is flipping Clabo and Baker. The Ravens were able to do that with Oher. And in any case, how much worse could Clabo be protecting Ryan’s blindside?
"Smith expressed befuddlement at the team's performance."
I think overall this is the thing that concerns me the most.
true.... true.....
We can acknowledge problems all week long, it’s time to do something about them. While we are at it let’s go ahead and fix the poor tackling and overall soft D.
by VA Dirty Bird on Sep 27, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions
after three years
Three winning years at that, we can ask that our team be fundamentally sound……
by VA Dirty Bird on Sep 27, 2011 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions
ok, sorry
I totally forgot about the sarcasm font…
by VA Dirty Bird on Sep 27, 2011 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
No reason to expect this
The past three years, our line has been very good, keeping Ryan in the top 5 of least sacked QBs. The horrendous performance this year after losing only one player is quite stunning and certainly not something the coaches should have expected.
"Competition at all spots"
Which coaches are we interviewing this week?
by dirtybirdy84 on Sep 27, 2011 8:29 AM EDT reply actions 8 recs
HAHAHA^^^^
That what I’m saying.
by falcons101 on Sep 27, 2011 8:32 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Bob Bratkowski vs. Mike Mularky
Worth a try, eh?
by dirtybirdy84 on Sep 27, 2011 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Brian Billick?
Supposedly an excellent WR and TE coach.
by Adam_S on Sep 27, 2011 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Smitty needs a offensive mind
Billick might work or Haley is he gets fired or even Bratkowski if he has some creativity.
Valdez coming up to light a fire under the OLine?
Don’t know who we’d send down though…I guess if he’s on the practice squad they wouldn’t have to send anyone down to see if he can unseat a starter on the line. He’s played predominately LG unless I’m mistaken….maybe they give him and johnson more reps at RG over this week? Most likely they work on scheme a LOT this week before roster moves but who knows. Trying Romberg out a RG too?
Any free agents out there still? I find it hard to believe there are many that are starter caliber left hiding in the weeds at this point.
Mike Johnson
We need to at least give him a try in a real game.A lot of players are completely different when in a game setting and not pre season.Sitting there getting mad as hell watching your line get mauled.Mike Smith is so conservative he forgets these things and while we are at it Rogers needs to be put to work.He is no different from Sproles at NO.Maybe even better.Problem is is we have to do ESP football.We have to imagine what they might do rather than actually see them do it.Maybe we can ESP the damncoach into doing something that might work.The o line is weak but we could fix that.Starting this week Ovie meet Bakers ass.You will be either on his right or left but you will be there at every play till this running over biz is done with.<More draw plays no more passes till we get it right.We have the power to bowl over all of our other teams just running and we need to re establish that part.Screen plays there is a ton of things.Hey Mike when are you gonna get it?When Matt Ryan is in the hospital?
by JT131 on Sep 27, 2011 9:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
There won't be a single change made on the starting 22 worth mentioning
Maybe some superficial stuff like a bench guy “starting” for a regular, then promptly sitting after 2-3 plays. That’ll learn em. But going to the ST’s front, has there been a call put out to a few punters to show that pile-o-crap Bosher that he better shape the f@(k up? Easiest position to replace on the team and a position that has been killing us. Parrish easily was on par w/him the preseason, sometimes out punting our wonderful 6th round pick. My guess is no.
love this idea
Matt Dodge would not only press bosher for the job. I think he would ultimately take it! But the part I really like is that he is young, so we would have punter shored up for years to come
Yeah...
I gotta say I think my 5 year old could give Bosher compatition. Little man kicked me in the jewels the other day (on accident of course) and thought I was gonna die. Then I thought…“wow, he could punt and kick off for my Falcons”. I have him training now, see if I can get him in there as a walk-on.
April 1974 - Tug McGraw, when asked if he preferred grass or AstroTurf: "I don't know. I never smoked AstroTurf."
by Blood_Talon on Sep 27, 2011 11:23 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Bosher is a hell of a tackler.
How would we fill that role.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 2:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Baker at right tackle?
What’s the worst that could happen?
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
Right guard i mean
and reynolds at right tackle with clabo at LT
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
I don't think Clabo is good enough in pass protection
That he can just slot in at left tackle.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Sep 27, 2011 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
yeah, he's struggling bad enough on the Right side so far...
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
OL stunk as a whole.
There is no easy fix here if Players don’t step up. Its not a simple problem of one single player not stepping up. May be there is a slight possibility of an overhaul in the OL, not sure if it is for better or for worse. However,competition can lit up big fire under the players.
It's all about Process...
At this point
I dont think Clabo or Reynolds would do worse than Baker. You never know till you try. But I still think a lot of pressure could be taken off of the line and Ryan w/ better play calling from MM.
Look at Tampa, we couldnt pin our ears back and rush b/c we didnt know if they wete going to rt un or pass. We you drop back 40-50 per game the opposition is just going rush up field hard. Nothing a draw or midfle screen co you ldnt correct. Did anyone see how Dallas slowed down the Eagles pass rush by running a screen off the LT? They had the RB fake a block on the RE then let him slide pass for a nice screen play.
But we know MM does not have the plays in his playbook, nor is he able to adjust to the play of the competition.
An early lead wld also allow us to run more so
we wldnt need to pass so much, and the D wldnt be able to pin back their ears so much.
by Magellan55 on Sep 27, 2011 9:57 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Hawley has to stay on the field somehow
I think you bump him to guard. He was very, very good when McClure was out, and while I know very intimately the differences between the center and guard positions, chances are he’s mobile enough to play the part and it would be at least worth a try against Seattle.
As for tackle and pass pro…sigh. I miss Bob Whitfield.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Sep 27, 2011 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
We ALL miss Bob Whifield
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Sep 27, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
RG seems like the problem to me
Baker gets beat yes, but thats not anything new. He got beat last year. What is new is we no longer have that tenacious RG in Dahl anymore. And we need someone to replace him. I say let Hawley try! Or anyone for that matter!
Bring up the President
I would like to see Jackson get a shot. He was pretty good in pre season. Not like we got anything to lose the way this O line is playing.
Fix right guard, it fixes alot
I know Baker is getting blown up, but it’s been our interior line that has been getting thrashed, and this is an important point. Even if Baker gets beat, if he can at least force the DE to have to go around the back, this will buy an extra second. The problem has been the pressure and penetration happening up front.
I examined several of the sacks Ryan took this week and last, and the overriding trend – when he’s been taken down by a DE – is that he doesn’t have room to step UP into the front of the pocket. Had Ryan had the room the interior line should be providing, some of those sacks don’t happen.
by The DW on Sep 27, 2011 10:04 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Maybe, however
Every NFL team is forced to make decisions like this. It would have been ideal to keep Dahl, but the FO obviously felt that he was the most expendable. Hindsight is 20/20 and I’m sure they were hoping either Reynolds or Johnson would be a suitable replacement.
Seeing what they did in Free agency, I can’t argue with the initial decision. We got two good veterans in the secondary – and that seemed to help, as secondary play has improved so far this year. I believe Edwards has been good enough and has been taking some pressure off of Abe and allowing Biermann to get rest throughout the game, making him a better contributor.
I do wish we had the same line, but at some point we were going to have to replace someone.
by The DW on Sep 27, 2011 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would have kept Dahl over Blalock
I know blalock is good but Dahl was nasty and with Clabo held that right side up. Especially since we have Hawley and Johnson who play LG.
Blalock has been the best OL this season
Not to mention playing beside Tyrannosaurus Baker. I’m thinking maybe Clabo should have been the one replaced
by birdwatch on Sep 27, 2011 2:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Can Blaylock play LT?
Our coaches always stress cross training. He has the size, dont know about the feet.
Good point
But I also think Ryan needs to work on his footwork. I saw at least 2 passes that he was throwing while falling back to avoid the hit. The difference in Ryan and the elite QBs is that they avoid the initial rusher by sliding or side stepping the defender.
by Magellan55 on Sep 27, 2011 10:13 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
No big argument here
I think he hasn’t done it because he’s never been asked to do so before. The line for his first three years gave him enough time to work out of a pure pocket. This degradation in the OLine is something new, so it would stand to reason that the scheme – and the QB with it – need to adjust to the new realities, and that doesn’t happen overnight.
Ryan ain't that guy
He’s not a Brees/Rodgers/Roethlisberger type who is shifty and clever in the backfield. He IS more like Manning in that he needs to be able to pass from inside the pocket.
When your RG is getting run over like a pothole, that makes his job impossible.
When Ryan scrambles he looks like he's got two left legs
Remember the Chicago game when he neatly placed the ball on the ground for Urlacher to run in the endzone? If he’s not going to run away from anyone (which clearly seems to be the case), he might as well just curl up in fetal position and tuck the ball in.
I think he does ok...
scambling is not the best part of his game and definitely won’t make any highlight reals but with the way the OL is playing we are going to see allot more of it. God help us if this actually turns out to be the truth moving forward!!
April 1974 - Tug McGraw, when asked if he preferred grass or AstroTurf: "I don't know. I never smoked AstroTurf."
by Blood_Talon on Sep 27, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
not a good comparison
even a pothole makes people slow down
Nah...
depends on how big your truck is…I don’t slow down for them…lol
April 1974 - Tug McGraw, when asked if he preferred grass or AstroTurf: "I don't know. I never smoked AstroTurf."
by Blood_Talon on Sep 28, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed.
Interior line has been a big problem,even the Trent Cole Sack should not have happened if not for Mike Patterson 98 of Eagles comming from inside and Ryan had to move in to arms of Trent Cole.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Coaching
Since we are probably not going to bring in a FA (this year), I think the coaches need to step up. The OC can do a better job of keeping the D off balance, and the OL coach can work w/ Baker on his footwork, or try Clab at LT. And the QB coach can work w/Ryan on his footwork. A little improvement w/ the OL and Ryans footwork will help, but I think the biggest change needs to come from MM and his play calling. Untill we get it corrected, we may need to use double TEs, or use Snelling as a blocker to protect Ryan and decoy some plays & float out for some screens
by Magellan55 on Sep 27, 2011 10:45 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Agree completey
The troubling thing is that it took two losses to realize changes needed to be made, but I do think Smitty is going to make some of these important changes. I think you’ll see more 3 step drops and quick-outs, as well as more of the no-huddle – although, I thought we would see that this past Sunday.
Since OLine is not easily fixed by free-agency, we have to make necessary changes to the scheme to protect our QB.
OL holding up for 2 secs.
With an OL which can hold up for 2-3 seconds at most, there are not many schemes or plays you can run. Fix the OL, the games are won in the trenches upfront.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Saw somewhere
that there’s a rift developing between Mularkey and Smitty.
Whether that’s a true statement or not, I don’t know, but it would be interesting.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Sep 27, 2011 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
NFL reported he took over playcalling at one point.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 12:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
i got that feeling too
some of coach smiths comments after the iggies game that he wanted to go to no huddle more often/sooner. and then this week in the after half interview talking about going to the no huddle more. Now his comments are they’re looking at the SCHEME, then the players.I think he’s beginning to see the origin of the problems are coming from the OC
Reynolds will sit
Hawley or Johnson are competing for his spot. Clabo at LT wouldn’t be an improvement, but it might send a message. Of course, if the receiver of the message hasn’t the talent to act on it, why bother?
Is Stinchcomb through? I mean through-through?
Baker.
He is not as bad as people make him sound. Interior of the Line is getting blown up.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
No dude, he sucks.
I saw him blown up over and over the last three games but it’s not just him.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 12:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Well said Vishnu
With RGGR being pushed back into the pocket regularly, where does Matt run? Of course he has to go to the left where Baker is. I’m not saying Sam is a solid LT but his shortcomings are magnified when the rest of the line is playing the way it is.
by aces666high on Sep 27, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree it will be Reynolds (if anybody at all)
And I agree that Mike Johnson does have a real shot at it. I don’t think him being on the inactive list all 3 games is necessarily a black mark against him – it’s just how Smitty constructs his game-day roster. 5 starters, a backup Center, and the swing Tackle (Svitek).
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
MJ not active for games
doesn’t that also allow the Falcons to hold onto his rights for longer as well?
Sorry to say but I expected a rebuilding this year. We just haven’t drafted as well as other teams and therefore have fallen behind. Than again, not many teams look great this year. Although my concerns with Ryan are coming to fruition I still believe he can correct his errors and become a solid QB long term—-we just need to give him this chance by getting rid of Mularkey. I’ve never understood everyone’s support of Mularkey, other than a decent brief stint with Buffalo he’s been a failure. As for offensive line—-Baker is busting and Hawley will never be strong enough to compete. Garret is a huge tree sadly he blocks like one too. I never got a chance to watch the Fresno draftee—how did he look?
I’m still amused by Vicks meltdown this weekend. I was one of the lonely voices yelling for Schaub during Vicks stint in Atlanta—-so now I’m taking amusement in how Vick hasn’t changed. He’s still the highlight film that will never win consistently.
Schaub wasn't exactly Mr. Clutch in New Orleans this weekend
Save for an immaculate reception style td catch from Walter, that was a major choke job against Brees, despite his “I’m going to murder you in your sleep” gaze he had.
Vick
D’ya hear about him calling out the zebras? “I want those 15 yard flags like every other QB gets.” Everyone but Matty Ice
by birdwatch on Sep 27, 2011 12:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He should go have a talk with Cullen Jenkins
Make him stop headbutting QBs left and right, and THEN Vick has a leg to stand on when complaining about calls.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation.
Twitter: @Stoehrst or @TheBentMusket
by Steve Stoehr on Sep 27, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I blame the OL for matthew's break down.
You can’t throw a ball from your ass, no one can.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 12:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Agree
With 2 seconds to throw the ball no Qtr back can survive for long.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
While I agree...
M. Turner did not hava a good game at all. I think it more had to do with the OL. Because he was rock solid the first two games, even displaying the catching skills which were a pleasant surprise I might add…one of the few we have had so far!
April 1974 - Tug McGraw, when asked if he preferred grass or AstroTurf: "I don't know. I never smoked AstroTurf."
by Blood_Talon on Sep 27, 2011 11:27 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Picked a bad year to shuffle the OLine
What with the lockout and all I think all the changes on offense(picking up Julio, dropping Jenkins and Norwood and Dahl)were bound to show some growing pains.
I don’t think Matty has worked with Julio enough to get comfortable enough to trust him. It was better last week but it will take time. If you watched Ryan last week it seemed like his first look was always to Roddy or Gonzo(for good reasons)but other teams see that too.
Overall, I think they will be fine. There’s too much panic and flop sweat for just 3 games, people.
"Football has never been just a game to me. Never."
Paul William Bryant
This isn't panic. This is anger.
Not “I’m going to keel you!” anger but “this team looks almost exactly like preseason week one!” anger. This team can’t even admit they made a mistake by drafting a punter in the 6th round and cutting their losses. One more thing on our esteemed staff. After huge seasons like we had last year, staffs are picked clean by other teams looking for that magic. Our staff came back almost untouched. MM got some token looks by teams and nothing more. Other teams could smell the stink coming off of him. The smoke and mirrors aren’t working anymore!!! Losing a guard on your line and a center for a few games shouldn’t do this to a team! Open your eyes Smitty! It’s looking you right in the face! It’s the guy sitting on the floor coloring and drawing pics of battleships fighting a sea monster. Take his construction paper away and give him a timeout before the whole season goes to hell!!
Those stupid dumb bastards need to get it together.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 12:29 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I want my Dahl back.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 12:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Adjust the play calling
The line on the Falcons is blitz the hell out of them. Every other team in the NFL goes to quick slants and screen plays when the defense is blitzing. MM keeps running our WR’s on deep routes and TG seems to be 10-12 downfield as well.
The OLine blocks decently enough against four man rushes. MM is not making the adjustments when the defense stacks the line. Ryan DOES make the adjustment when he is running the no huddle which is why you see a lot more quick passes when he is calling the plays.
Sacks.
Most of the sacks this year came with 4 man rush. Its an OL problem which scheme can’t fix. Yes Scheme can hide it by running the ball and quick slants but if the OL cant hold up a 4 man rush, there is a bigger problem.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I respectfully disagree
Yes we have a bigger problem, and the OL shld do a better job against a 4 man front, but when that 4 man front knows you are going to pass, then they will get a burst off the snap.
Schemes cld help to slow down the rush, especially if the D doesnt know if its a pass or a run coming (which Tampa did a good job of). Also, sports are @ momentum, so use a TE or RB to slow down the rush untill the Offense gets some momentum going.
Getting a lead early will also help to slow down a strong pass rush, b/c there wld be no need throw 50 times.
by Magellan55 on Sep 27, 2011 2:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
With score 0-0 against Tampa.
The first sack and fumble happened in the Q1. You have a point on scheme but I cant believe that OL can’t hold on for 2 seconds. If Qb has 2 seconds to throw there aren’t many schemes which can help.
It's all about Process...
by Vishnu_falcon on Sep 27, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree wih that...
No schem will work in in only 2 secs, but what I was saying was to scheme to stop the pass rush, then when you have more time, your QB will have the time to do his thing. Yes you wld be down a weapon if your TE or RB is used as a blocker, but at least you wld give your QB chance, and not get him killed.
by Magellan55 on Sep 27, 2011 4:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
NO HUDDLE!!!!!
Expand it and run it until teams figure it out then go back to conservative BS. We need to win and win now and the key is in Matt’s brain.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 1:56 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Isn’t it obvious. Every time Matt runs the no huddle the offense gets something going. MM is unable to respond to what the defense is giving him. Matt has the ability to read the defense and his coach doesn’t. MM just doesn’t know what to do if his “script” doesn’t pan out
by NewAgeDirtyBirdFan on Sep 27, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Change is imminent...
So your telling me that if things continue going as they are management is gonna just watch their multi-million dollar investment and face of the franchise get buried into the dirt week in and week out because of chemistry…what chemistry? Its obvious changes need to be made, its that bad. Seattle might cover it up for a week but then guess what, Green Bay comes back into town. I understand these guys are trained at specific positions but at the same time they have to be interchangable to some degree. Move guys around or bring in help but to say the same personel would be thrown out there without attempting change is really a lack of creativity and responsibility.
by Bigru3 on Sep 27, 2011 2:02 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Competition is coming?
It should have been there. If you think a player is better than another don’t keep the worst player just cause he is a draft pick. The O line needs to be fixed. This offense cant be explosive if Matt is on the ground before he can even set his feet.
This staff needs to find a solution quick cause we all know how short Blank’s patience is.
Talk about meltdowns...
I’ve been reading this site for a year now and this is almost amusing. Some of the same commentors who’ve been slobbering all over this team and HC and FO about the last 3 seasons are now ready to blow up the team after 3 LOUSY GAMES!
And NO, preseason doesn’t count.
They made a lot of changes in the offseason and it is gonna take a little time.
As far as the no-huddle, they can probably run it a little more but you have to wonder if the conditioning is there to run it all the time like some suggest.
After living through Marion Campbell twice, June Jones, Jerry Glanville, and Jim Mora, I’m willing to give Smitty some time to work out the kinks. I think he deserves a little more trust after what he’s done the past couple of years.
"Football has never been just a game to me. Never."
Paul William Bryant
Don't think anyone is bashing Smitty.
It’s MM and BVG that are in question MM, more so. BVG made som corrections and it showed.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 2:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I have as many sacks as Edwards.
lol. I know it’s 3 games, But I haven’t seen any close calls either.
But do you have as many fumble recoveries?
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Sep 27, 2011 2:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree...
There might be more fumbles if RE would get to the qb.
by Bigru3 on Sep 27, 2011 2:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Mike Johnson! Put his ass in at guard
Put somebody’s ass in at guard they can’t be any worse then Reynolds. Reynolds, even tho he’s soft can maybe play tackle someday. If we don’t start blocking our season is over before it starts. We don’t know how to beat pressure and blitzes. It called a screen pass. Or even a quick pass to somebody other then the running back. The D has been decent but has more potential. Mike Smith needs to step it up I don’t care if he has to strong arm BVG. Take control. We MUST get the wrinkles during these next 2 weeks. This shit is embarrassing.
by DEMBIRDZCUZ! on Sep 27, 2011 3:26 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He's been in the backfield alot
Plus, last year, he didn’t have a sack in the first 7 games. He came on stronger towards the end of the season (including against the Packers).
You can’t look at Sacks alone. He may be taking pressure off of our DTs or off Abraham and giving them a better look.

by 
















