ESPN: Atlanta Falcons Want Matt Bryant Back
The feeling is apparently mutual.
An argument broke out and swung its fists wildly when we talked about just who Matt Bosher was supposed to be replacing on the Falcons roster. I've maintained since shortly after the draft that while he can do either, he's likely to take over for Michael Koenen, but not all of you have agreed.
Why? Well, Koenen's been a bit up and down the last couple of seasons, and rumor has it that he's seeking a big deal for a punter, which I understand is like $8 an hour. Bryant, on the other hand, was great last season and will likely be willing to sign for a short-term deal. Kicker of the future he's not, but valuable? Definitely.
Here's the relevant passage from the ESPN story:
Unless something happens very quickly, Bryant’s going to have to make a very difficult decision soon. He’s a free agent and, although the Falcons have said they’d like to re-sign him and his preference is to remain in Atlanta, no deal was reached before the lockout and there’s no guarantee one will be reached if and when it is lifted.
Read the rest of the piece to get a sense of the very real frustrations Bryant is facing, which may conspire to keep him from returning to the Falcons if the damn lockout ever ends. But if the desire's there on both sides, I'm at least encouraged about the possibility.
What are your thoughts, gentle readers?
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Somebody
has got to go. You can’t draft a kicker and sit him.
Absolutely...
agree, you don’t spend a pick on a kicker and not use him. As for who goes…I don’t really have an opinion. BUT…I did love the “$8 an hour” comment…had me rolling!!
by Joseph K. Houston on Jun 2, 2011 3:26 PM EDT reply actions
Letting Bryant go would be a mistake.
He had how many game winning kicks last year? I don’t remember, but it was at least 3 (I personally witnessed the 49ers one) The man was a hella clutch kicker and still has a good leg.
I wouldn’t trust a rookie to come in and be able to do that. HOWEVER, Koenen’s punts have been “Meh” since we destroyed the punt return yardage record a few years ago, and I think we can get someone who can do better.
That also being said, Bryant has earned his payday, in my opinion, but paying two kickers good money is a bad idea. I think (and hope) we’ll pay Bryant and let Bosher come in and be the Punter/Kickoff specialist, with Biermann doing emergency duty.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jun 2, 2011 3:53 PM EDT reply actions
Ok...
I do have an opinion…
What this guy just said… :)
by Joseph K. Houston on Jun 2, 2011 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
What's up with the Koenen bashing?
“$8 an hour”? Seriously?
Every punter in the NFL – and especially Michael Koenen – deserves to be paid more than $8 an hour.
I hope Matt Bosher lives up to the expectations of all the Koenen haters.
That wasn't Koenen bashing...
That was a joke about the wide perception of a punter’s going rate.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
Which happens to be more than I make, currently. ($7.48 an hour representing.)
Dang. If I wanted a small raise, I could be a punter in the NFL!
I’m down for this. Dave, sign me up!
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Jun 2, 2011 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Why especially Michael Koenen?
He’s a below average to average NFL punter. There are several better punters in the NFL. Both our kick coverage and punt coverage were awful last season until we put starters on both units. Koenen kicks both of these.
Basing results solely on one year ...
means most of the players on the Falcons now would be gone (Michael Turner after 2009, for one).
I am not convinced that handing these duties over to a rookie is any reason for significant faith that those numbers will improve.
He wasn't good in 2009 either
And he wants to be one of the best paid players it his position in the league.
2 consecutive years of below average performance + unreasonable wage demands=off the team.
Whereas you’re talking like he’s the next coming of Ray Guy.
Well Bosher better start for the Falcons while Romeus never starts for the Saints or I’ll be hating life for another 20 years as I did with Favre.
I'm not too sure but...
…did you seriously just put Bosher pick on the same level of the Favre pick?
"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.
We would be foolish
not to bring him back. He was nails for us last year and we don’t even have a replacement that we know is any good. Matt has quite a bit left in him I would say. Plus, I think relying on “Matt’s” is a good bet for us lol
I say we low-ball him at $7.50.
Bryant comes back. He has been too good for us after years of truly shaky kicking.
I'm on the Twitter: twitter.com/edgrohl

by 















