The Falcoholic Delivers The 2011 Falcons NFL Draft Grades
The 2011 NFL Draft has come and gone. With an opportunity to digest the five picks made by the Atlanta Falcons, I'm ready to deliver my draft grades.
This morning I covered the fact that many major draft pundits, including famous hair champion Mel Kiper Jr., are giving this grade somewhere between a C and a B. That factors in the massive trade that landed the team Julio Jones, an approach that I'm planning to adopt myself.
As many of you have noted, these kinds of grades are essentially useless. I indulge in them only to give you a glimpse of what I think of the draft class of 2011 and to foment further discussion on what you all think of the selections. After all, if we can't talk about these kinds of designations on a blog, what the hell are we doing here?
My grades are based on potential and, in my mind, how the guys will fit with the Falcons and their production in 2011 and beyond.
If you're willing to take the jump with me, I'll take you kids to school. Join me!
WR Julio Jones
A-
If you were going to pick up a wide receiver who was a perfect fit for the Atlanta Falcons, his name would be Julio Jones and the Falcons would have just drafted him with the sixth overall pick.
Jones is a proficient route runner, a physical freak at wide receiver and a guy who is both capable of and willing to block like a box of Legos. By all accounts, he's driven to be great. His only tangible flaw is that he drops the occasional pass, and I'm not particularly worried about his ability to overcome that.
The only reason Jones doesn't get a plus or an even A is what the Falcons gave up for him and the hands issues, but make no mistake: I expect Jones to be the team's best receiver within a couple of years, and an elite option in this offense.
He's going to be a fixture for the Falcons for years to come. If you can't get excited about a receiver as explosive as Jones, you've got nothing going on inside.
LB Akeem Dent
B+
If Jones was close to a home run, Dent is probably a double.
A versatile linebacker who can play inside or outside, Dent is a hard hitter with a knack for stopping running backs. He needs considerable work in pass coverage and lacks ideal lateral agility, but he's going to be a great backup and a potential future starter down the line.
The Falcons desperately needed linebacker depth, especially because Mike Peterson, Stephen Nicholas or both could be in 2011. With only aging Coy Wire and the inexperienced Spencer Adkins and Robert James providing depth outside of those guys, Dent is going to be an immediate upgrade.
I don't expect the guy to ever be an elite talent, but he was great value for the third round, if you ask me.
RB Jacquizz Rodgers
A+
The Falcons did an amazing job getting Rodgers as late as they did. One of the most dynamic players in the entire draft, the 5'6" Rodgers is durable and potent enough to grab an immediate and significant role with the team.
Rodgers is the kind of guy who could change the fortunes of a team, and the Falcons have lacked the big-play dynamic he brings to the table for many years. While he may lack top-end speed, his agility, tackle-breaking ability and fantastic intangibles make him an ideal fit.
Brilliant draft pick. I love it.
K/P Matt Bosher
C+
This pick fills a huge need for the Falcons, because whether you want him to kick or punt, the Falcons are likely to lose Matt Bryant or Michael Koenen. With a strong, accurate leg, Bosher is going to be good at either position.
That said, I am not a huge fan of picking a special teams guy in the sixth round, and I think Bosher could've been had in the seventh round without a major problem. I know I'm nitpicking because it was that late in the draft, but I just don't like that. I also don't think Bosher is an elite option, but hey. Can't win 'em all.
If Bosher does immediately land the job and do well, feel free to retroactively bump him up into the B range.
OG Andrew Jackson
A
It's not every day you get a long-dead president to play guard for you, so the Falcons won on those merits along.
A guard with superlative footwork and more upside than a seventh round pick should have, Jackson was originally forecast to go in the middle rounds of the draft. Whether he's going to be groomed as a future starter or simply as a versatile backup (he played a little center), Jackson is an excellent fit for the Falcons and fantastic value so late in the draft.
DE Cliff Matthews
A-
If you can get a guy talented enough to crack your defensive end rotation in the first couple years after he's been drafted in the seventh round, you're doing something right.
Matthews may not have all-world upside, but he's got some pass-rushing chops, a good motor and a work ethic that makes him a natural Falcon. I won't say he can start, but he's going to be a valuable piece for a team that sorely needs capable defensive ends that make under $3 million a year. Great pick to cap the draft.
Final Grade
B+/A-
On balance, the Falcons' draft would be an A-/A based on picks alone. I am tremendously excited about almost every player in this draft, and I think it will transform the team's fortunes.
I may take some heat for this, but I can't look at the trade for Julio Jones and not drop a third of a grade off of what the Falcons have done. Unless Julio Jones is one of the best receivers in the NFL for the next decade, the Falcons simply surrendered a lot to get him. More than teams generally give up for wide receivers, and the loss of the team's first round pick could cost the Falcons a valuable player in 2012.
It may be that history vindicates this trade, and I certainly fervently hope it will. But the Falcons took a giant risk, and as such I'm cautious about signing off on this draft with an A+.
Talk to me in a year and we'll see where we stand.
66 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Your analysis is fair.
You didn’t ignore the Julio trade, but you didn’t kill us for the trade either.
I admit I feel a lot better about the trade after seeing who we drafted. The Falcons got extremely lucky with some of these guys falling. Had the back end of our draft been filled with reaches and unknowns, I would have been bummed.
We’ll lose our top pick in 2012, but we still have our 2nd and 3rd available. Since some feel that TD would have landed gems with our 2nd and 4th this season, why can’t he do that next year?
I am bi-winning. I win not only here but also there.
The trade was genius
Obviously, the author here didn’t downgrade the selection of Julio as much as other pundits – I think that’s a good thing. I don’t believe that pundits will realize the genius of this trade for a few years – if at all.
Why? One thing that I think both the owners and the NFLPA agree to is that a new CBA will contain a rookie salary scale that will not kill the cap situation of teams for missing on a top 10 pick. Hence, this trade not only means that we were aggressive in trading for what GMTD and CMS think is a critical missing piece to our team, but that we don’t face the “true” risk of drafting a guy in the top 10.
In 3-5 years (and if Julio hits), people will sit around and say that the Falcons were the 1st (and possibly only) team that realized what the future held and pounced when the price was still cheap enough to make it remotely feasible.
I don't agree with some of the grades
I would give Dent a C-. Most people believe he would have been available later in the draft (fifth round, I don’t know) but for a guy with so many question marks, third round seemed high. I hope he proves me wrong and can play all three positions. But with all of these question marks and a definite need, he deserves a lower grade.
I would give an A- to Rodgers. I admit to not being the biggest fan of the pick, but I can accept that I am in the minority as he does fill a huge need. My biggest problem is giving up a pick to move up and get him in the fifth. Were we really that terrified that he would be gone before we picked when he had fallen to the fifth already? Was he and that seventh round pick worth more than some of the other guys like Devine or Locke? Was the opportunity cost worth losing a pick that could be used on a guy like Devlin, Herzlich, or Lefeged? I’m not sure they were, so I have to knock the pick a bit.
Bosher I give a B-. Yes he is a punter/kicker. But obviously we are going to need one of them this year, and with the shroud surrounding FA, it was a smart move. Could we have picked him up in the seventh? Probably. Does it address a need? Yes. He is one of the top players in the country at his position, and we have the rights to him. Hard to complain about that. And plus, it’s not like we used a first or second round pick on him.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 2, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions
Honestly.
I do not think Rodgers would have made it to the Falcons in Round 5 had they not moved up.
Personally, I like Rodgers better than Devine or Locke. Plus, Devine, Locke, and the other players you mention are still available. While we will have to compete with other teams to sign them, even landing one would be the equivalent of the additional 7th round pick we gave to the Rams. I like the move.
As for Dent, I’m not sure. I’m a UGA fan, so naturally, I view Dent through red-and-black-colored lenses. That said, I am reading mixed reviews on him. He’s the only pick that I question. I view him as a solid, rotational LB and not a full-time starter. We’ll see.
I am bi-winning. I win not only here but also there.
Dent would not have fallen to us in the fifth.
An unspecified team tried to trade into our spot (presumably for him) and then one other NFL executive said they were hoping to get Dent in the 3rd round too.
"Success comes from knowing that you did your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming." -John Wooden
Devine, Herzlich and Locke were obviously not worth a 7th round pick to any team in the league
As they went undrafted. We can sign these guys as undrafted free agents. Dent would not have been available in the 5th round. A team tried to trade up to the spot where we took him to draft him. So he was going off the board with that pick no matter what.
Everyday I’m thinking about how Julio differs from AJ Green for our team and the differences I come up with do nod towards JJ being a more useful pick. The big edge is his physical approach to the game (blocking included here) and intelligence, I firmly believe he’s smarter then AJ (AJ always seemed very nice but kind of dumb to me and yes I’ve met him several times). I gave our draft a B on NFL.com’s fan survey and still stand by that grade.
The other picks all make fantastic sense when you factor in the organizations drafting protocols (a solid mix of character, intelligence, leadership, and skill set) Again we didn’t sacrifice principles to get that rare athlete that fell b/c of character concerns.
Didn't Roddy White do that, also?
"Success comes from knowing that you did your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming." -John Wooden
Yeah...
but for a while there (a long while), I thought Roddy was a bust. AJ’s not going to have Price around to teach him, and may bust anyway.
CAU: Pronounced 'Cow'. Cuteness Above Uggla, analytical measurement that gives a factor of a player's cuteness above Dan Uggla. For example,
Nobody has a positive CAU.
Martin Prado leads the league with a -0.0 CAU.
You mean Finneran?
I wasn’t saying his Wonderlic makes him a bad player. Just giving some tangible evidence for the guy who called him simple
Price? Aghh!
That guy? Please no.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on May 2, 2011 10:58 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I will say that I think AJ is more “Boom or Bust” with a greater upside then JJ… I want to love JJ though, I just need some time. What I sited to me suggests JJ will be a more solid player and part of me is starting to like the fact that the Falcons failed at landing AJ. I do wish AJ success though but damn Cincy wil a handicap he’ll have to overcome.
Love the Julio and Rodger's picks...
I was hoping we’d get another Warrick Dunn, and we may have gotten him in Rodgers.
"It's called Thanksgiving for a reason. If I can give and people thank me for it, that's kind of the thing that makes me feel great inside." - Dunta
agreed
I was thinking Derrick Locke/Quizz Rodgers. There was no doubt they needed speed out of the backfield. Julio Jones trade I have to admit, I was rather blown away disgusted at first. The more I swallow the deal and understand what the team is thriving for, it makes more sense and that’s simple….win now! Every player drafted this year will make the final roster.
Let's get this CBA resolved and play some ball!
Quite Frankly
I know that this has been stressed numerous times; but, it is extremely stupid to be handing out draft grades at this time. It’s a lot like selecting a stock portfolio: evaluation of the portfolio after one day, or one week, or even one month will give a conclusion that is almost certainly going to be wrong in five or ten years. I would prefer to own stocks that can be looked upon as successful picks five years down the road, not the day after I buy them. Similarly, I wouldn’t mind receiving a D- from every draft ‘guru’ or ‘expert’ today if that meant that in five years, we could look back on this as a successful draft.
This is part of the draft hype. We are trained (by sports media outlets and by the NFL) that this draft is going to determine the fate of our team. And by delivering extremely positive and negative analysis (most of which will be regarded as incorrect in the next few years anyway), the media feeds the thought that our team can be doomed or created based on one draft.
In my opinion, the only team that can really have a bad draft is the team that continuously selects low-level talent at high rounds, or that fails to address any of it’s needs. And no team willingly does both in the same draft. And even so, reaching on draft picks is not such a bad thing. There are numerous success stories out of the fourth, fifth, and sixth rounds, and if a team feels that a prospect is going to explode in the NFL, they have a right (and obligation to themselves and their fans) to draft that prospect where they feel he should be taken.
This brings me to my final point. These draft ‘gurus’, as they are called, are not the best in the business. The best in the business are those that are running the NFL teams and are making the picks on draft day. Unfortunately, we tend to perceive these journalism majors as ‘experts’, which, quite frankly, they are not. I would trust the analysis of TD and our scouting department or really, any other GM and their scouting department, every single time over the opinion of a guy that has never worked in the NFL, or has been caught giving incorrect positive reviews of players that have signed with a friend who is an agent (a la Mel Kiper). And yet, there are thousands of people just on SB Nation freaking out over what some idiot with a two-minute special on a tv show says.
In conclusion (and I thank you if you’ve stuck with me this far), these draft grades (especially those from national media outlets) do not matter. They don’t matter today, they won’t matter tomorrow, and they definitely won’t matter five years from now. I’m going to trust that the people who built a 13-3 NFL team know what they are doing better than some guy with an internet column.
CAU: Pronounced 'Cow'. Cuteness Above Uggla, analytical measurement that gives a factor of a player's cuteness above Dan Uggla. For example,
Nobody has a positive CAU.
Martin Prado leads the league with a -0.0 CAU.
by frozendesert on May 2, 2011 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Rec'd
I’ll readily agree that the grades don’t matter, but it’s part of the inevitable discussion following the draft and somewhat of a tradition here at The Falcoholic. I’ll freely admit that I know jack compared to the guys running the team, but we all have our own opinions.
As you said, when you put on the mantle of a draft expert and you’re frequently and horribly wrong (a la Mel Kiper), maybe that’s a different story.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
While I agree...
with almost all of your analysis on our picks. I just can’t wrap my brain around giving up the 1st round pick for next year…
I know we can never predict future picks and how they will pan out…hell, we can’t even predict how this one will pan out but at least its in the books now.
I will concede to “frozendesert” on this one and I just need to have faith in the leadership team that has brought us this far…
by Joseph K. Houston on May 2, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Feeling the Faith
CAU: Pronounced 'Cow'. Cuteness Above Uggla, analytical measurement that gives a factor of a player's cuteness above Dan Uggla. For example,
Nobody has a positive CAU.
Martin Prado leads the league with a -0.0 CAU.
Thanks
Experience and notoriety wise, you may not be at the top of the ladder. But down the road, your analysis of our draft picks has a good chance of being much, much more accurate than the experts (which, as you pointed out, are wrong). It’s like picking the weather for a specific date two years from now. Hard to do, and easily incorrect.
CAU: Pronounced 'Cow'. Cuteness Above Uggla, analytical measurement that gives a factor of a player's cuteness above Dan Uggla. For example,
Nobody has a positive CAU.
Martin Prado leads the league with a -0.0 CAU.
since you brought up "stock market...portfolio, ect" lets take it one step further: Diversification
you have 10,000 in stock that consists of 5 different companies, and then trade all of those in to buy 10,000 worth of APPLE
thats kinda what trading 5 lower draft picks for a high priced stock like Julio Jones is
by durst on May 2, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
that's a good investment
Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I don't like that attitude. I can assure them it is much more serious than that. - Bill Shankly
by armchair quarterback on May 2, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Well Apple did just release their income statement
But I think Julio is worth more than some Apple stock. Just sayin…
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 2, 2011 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I liked our draft
but I’m curious about who else we’re going to sign whenever this lockout ends. I’m thinking that we’ll re-sign Nicholas, Blalock, and Snelling. I’m not too sure about Peterson, Clabo, Weems or Bryant. I don’t believe we’re re-signing Dahl and Keonen.
As far as...
your list, I think not signing Dahl is a mistake…but what do I know…
Clabo is probably gone but Weems…we’re keeping this guy, at least I hope we are. Great all around player that give 110% on every play, which is what TD and Smith like in their players!!
by Joseph K. Houston on May 2, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
In an interview with Andrew Jackson
he said he had already spoken to Paul Boudreau (our OL coach), who had told him that there was ‘a lot of opportunity’ coming up on the OLine. Jackson seemed to be very excited about that in particular. That seems to indicate that Boudreau knows that at least a couple players (if not all the FAs?) might be leaving.
by KMarch on May 2, 2011 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Seems like a smart kid.
Also sounds like he knows how to play and is confident in his ability. I like him, especially for a 7th round pick.
Nice find!
Smokey says: Only you can BVG forest fires.
I like Jones, but I don't like the overall draft strategy.
As much as not having big-play capability killed us against the Packers, I can’t stress enough that we had a 5th-ranked offense and a 16th-ranked defense. Not enough was done in this draft to address needs on D, needs that we’ve had for several seasons now.
John Abraham isn’t getting any younger, and I don’t think Cliff Matthews will make a massive difference on the pass rush. Akeem Dent helps the run defense, but I still have huge questions for the secondary, which was torched regularly by Rodgers. Part of the Pack’s success was the defense’s decision not to leave a spy on Rodgers, allowing him to break a few key runs, but he systematically picked apart the secondary and that will happen again if we don’t address it.
Julio Jones should vastly improve the quick-strike capability of the offense, but I don’t want another season of nail-biting 3-point victories because the defense can’t get a stop. I don’t think we’re any closer to fixing that now than we were before the draft.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation
Those stats are a little bit of a fallacy
You’re comparing PPG and YPG stats. We had the 16th ranked offense and defense in YPG. We had the 5th ranked defense and offense in YPG. To all intents and purposes the units were exactly the same.
by Mosugo on May 2, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know we gave up fewer points last year.
Unfortunately, I’m a firm believer that “bend but don’t break” defenses eventually break. Spectacularly. Kind of like ours did against the Eagles and the Packers. The best defenses don’t give up yards AND don’t give up points.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation
16th in yards, 5th in points
Ironically we were the same for our offense? I guess we could argue statistically that offense was as big of a need as defense. But who would believe us? The only thing anyone in the national media can remember is Rodgers torching us. It wasn’t completely the defense’s fault (as the INT at the end of the half was a huge momentum swing) but they receive most of the blame.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 2, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Not to mention, the defense was on the field a lot...
b/c our offense couldn’t sustain drives and score points. GB wouldn’t have put up as many points as they did if our O was on the field more. Could have been a 35 – 33 game or something.
"It's called Thanksgiving for a reason. If I can give and people thank me for it, that's kind of the thing that makes me feel great inside." - Dunta
One mistake we are all doing
is everytime we talk about the draft or free agency we are comparing it to how that player could of helped use againts Green Bay. Even though that was are last game it was not are only one, we had 16 other games one of which was a victory againts Green Bay. It is important to look at are whole season not just that game.
by spanishfalcon on May 2, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Exactly.
I think the draft strategy was aimed to address the Packers loss, which is a mistake. The defense performed in the regular season, but very rarely felt confident in it.
Founder and Editor of The Bent Musket on SBNation
I don't...
think we are making that mistake at all. We need to beat the “Green Bay’s” of the NFL if we want a SB title and I think we are built for just that…already. I really don’t think that AB, TD and MS are boiling everything this team has done down to one game. ANYONE who does that just simply isn’t paying attention!!
I think our draft says the exact opposite!! What was all the analysis going in…got to get “D” squared away, pass rush, pass rush, pass rush. Nobody saw what they did coming. It was hinted at but everyone thought it was just misdirection…I know I did.
by Joseph K. Houston on May 2, 2011 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Completely true
We beat GB during the regular season. They were definitely a better team than us in the playoffs, but that game was an abnormality when it came to actual execution. I think that if that game is played 10 times, 4 time we beat them, 4 times we make it close, and only 2 times do we get burned by more than two touchdowns.
CAU: Pronounced 'Cow'. Cuteness Above Uggla, analytical measurement that gives a factor of a player's cuteness above Dan Uggla. For example,
Nobody has a positive CAU.
Martin Prado leads the league with a -0.0 CAU.
It is premature to blame the secondary solely for what happened in the GB game
Look at any film from the past two years and games where the secondary was having problems there was little pass rush. The antithesis of that was also true, just like any D. The pass rush needs more tweaking than the secondary.
Listern to you gys how soon we forget where the FALCONS used to be TD, MS AB have done a phenomally job in turning this franchise around and making it in to a contender, and now you have the nerve to question their motivates that shows that you are not true falcon fans. the season has not even started yet and you are putting loses in the column. give our gys a chance they feel like s#$% too with what happened against GB. who knows who will step up next year and have blow out season. or what else our FO has up there sleeve. me all i have to say is this from where we came from too this. IN TD, MS, AND AB “WE TRUST”
Agree with some
Rodgers would have been gone had we not moved up. He is a better back imo especially when it comes to blocking when compared to someone like Lewis from PA who went shortly after him. To me, this was our best pick of the draft. (A+)
I like the move for Jones in the first I believe the true value of this will be seen in the years to come. (B+ … If we could have switched a pick or two I would rank this higher). The two picks I didn’t like were Dent in the 3rd and the punter in the 6th. To me Dent is a career backup who would be a better pick in the 5th or the 6th. (C-) I feel we had greater need at the CB or DE position and there were still some talented people available in the 3rd for either position. A punter in the 6th is reaching imo even if we have a need there. (why not grab the TE from Nevada he was still on the boards and take the punter with our 2nd pick in the 7th … I still think he would have been available ) ©
Overall Grade B
I thought it was solid but not spectacular.
Did you see where Dent was not going to be around in the 5th or 6th round?
Evidently ATL wasn’t the only team that agreed with your assessment.
A few thoughts
I’ve come around to believe that the Julio Jones move was a necessary when, even with the price involved. Last year the Falcons were one of the least explosive teams in the NFL. One of the ways we were beaten, by the Saints and Packers especially, was when teams began to focus their secondary on Roddy White. With an explosive receiver in JJ they can no longer do that. 4.39 speed is a hell of an incentive to keep secondaries honest.
Let us be clear, Dent would not have been available in the fifth round, and most likely would have been gone by the end of the third round. His signing will definitely herald the end of the Mike Peterson era. Dent is versatile, able to play inside and outside, and will prove to be a valuable rotational linebacker and a possible future starter in a year or two. If he pans out he could provide the Falcons with a dangerous linebacker trifecta with Lofton and Weatherspoon.
Rodgers was a brilliant pick, and will prove to be our most valuable of the draft. We needed a complimentary pack to pair with Michael Turner and Rodgers should prove adept in that role. He is very similar to Darren Sproles and, lest we forget, the Chargers were quite lethal when they were able to offer the double punch of LT and Sproles.
Bosher could be important being that we are most likely to have an opening at either the P or K positions. Jackson and Matthews offer valuable depth.
We just have to wait to see what we achieve in FA. I’ve heard rumors that we are going to target DE Ray Edwards which would immediately solve our pass rushing issues and offer great aid to our often beleaguered secondary.
On potential this draft deserves a B+.
I'm still not sold on Edwards
WIth the line he is on, he should be putting up better stats. When the other team has to worry about Jared Allen and the Williams, there is no way they can focus more than one blocker on him. If you make him the #1 guy, he might crumble.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 2, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand that Abe is still the guy
But I don’t think he will play nearly the number of downs he did this year. I think for at least two downs, Edwards (or whoever else we bring in) will be the #1 guy. Abe will probably be used more on a rotational basis to utilize his speed and keep him fresh. Also, whoever we bring in, I want them to be capable of being the guy for the next few years once Abe retires.If we bring someone in for big money who can’t handle the attention of the offensive line, i would consider it an awful signing. Like I said, I don’t think Edwards can be the guy now, and I don’t know if he could be the guy in a couple of years. It definitely gives me some reservations.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 2, 2011 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
What?
If a FA DE is brought in it will be to sit Bierman. Why would you sit your best rushing DE? If you’r going to do that then forget signing a big name DE. The objective is to have them boht rushing the QB at the same time. Also, with this being Abe’s last contract year you can bet ATL will get everything out of him they can.
I would have to disagree.
I think to maximize what little is left of Abe, we have to use him in situations where he would excel. He is not a three down DE anymore. And Biermann would sit, on situational plays, when Abe would be on the field. I will give you an analogy to give my opinion of using Abe. And I will apologize as this might be influenced by my current hunger. Imagine you have an apple (or whatever kind you want) pie. There are three slices left. Do you consume all three at once to get every enjoyable morsel out of it? Or do you spread it out over three separate occasions when you think it would be best appreciated? Obviously, all analogies have their shortcomings, but I think you get the idea of what I’m saying. Abe doesn’t have much left. I would rather spread it out over the length of the season in the best situations than to burn him out early and be left without our pass rusher come time for the playoffs.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 3, 2011 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Disagree all you want
Your sceanrio does not help the pass rush. Abe get’s plenty of rest every season. By sitting Abe and rushing the FA that is the same EXACT scenario as ATL has now. One “stud” DE with less of a rush from the other end. The only way to maximize Abe and the FA DE is to have them on the field at the same time for a good number of stats. Abe always get’s cycled out as would whomever is signed since it’s MS’s philosophy.
Sign a FA DE to primarily rest Abe? Don’t waste the money.
Please no more analogies because they just aren’t of value for the discussion.
I wrote a post about us
I think you might enjoy it. Feel free to make any changes to what I have already stated. I am intrigued at your argument so I figure we should get the opinions of others. You may carry this argument over there if you please.
"He has lived up to the legendary billing... And the legend is born in Calvin Johnson!" -Wes Durham
by sportsfan4life2012 on May 3, 2011 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Dent, the over looked rookie
Here’s what I think is going to happen with Akeem Dent. I think the Falcons will use him as the starting middle lineback this year. This will allow them the flexability to move Curtis Lofton to weakside linebacker and improve that area of the team. Lofton makes sense if we don’t try to go after Peterson or Nicholas. I’m sure this isn’t the primary plan for the Falcons but Lofton has worked hard on improving his coverage skills and he is intelligent enough to make the switch. Plus, Lofton can still make all the defensive calls but Dent has experience in the same system.
I have no reason for believing any of this, no evidence, no nothing but it does make sense.
Interesting thought...
But I don’t see Lofton leaving the MLB spot.
"It's called Thanksgiving for a reason. If I can give and people thank me for it, that's kind of the thing that makes me feel great inside." - Dunta
Ha...
I just looked…
San Francisco traded up to get Rice at 16 in the first round of the 1985 draft. They draded their first two picks to NE to move up. Ironically, in that same draft, the Niners did not have a 2nd or 4th round pick…They also did not have a first round pick in the 1986 draft…(They did have three 3rd round picks, though…)
How’d that work out for them? I bet they would rather have had all those picks…3 Super Bowls and a HOF WR be damned!
I am bi-winning. I win not only here but also there.
And no...
I’m not saying that Julio Jones is a sure fire HOF or can even sniff Rice’s jockstrap at this point…
I’m merely pointing out that you don’t need a ton of picks to win Super Bowls…you only need a few special players.
I am bi-winning. I win not only here but also there.
I think all doubters will be silenced very, very soon.
I wouldn’t doubt if Matty, Roddy, and Julio have already had a talk.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on May 2, 2011 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions
For all those downgrading the Bosher pick
He will be the only rookie guaranteed to start on day 1. We may have heard rumblings that someone else was going to take him with the next pick. Who knows? Perhaps we decided that with our last 3 picks we decided we wanted Bosher, Jackson and Matthews and we knew Matthews and Jackson would last to our 7th round picks but weren’t sure about Bosher. So the logical thing to do is take Bosher first. If the FO thought Bosher would last till the 7th I’m sure they would have taken him there.
I agree 100%
A- is perfect, and only because of the cost. I didn’t really like Akeem Dent’s pick at first. I would have rather had a DE, but there was no one with good value at that spot. Dent is the best we could have got.
Dent is a MONSTER on special teams, so hopefully this year, we won’t see Moore, Spurlock, or Hightower run back kicks against us.

by 




















