The Ballad Of T.J. Yates, Or Taking Down The Texans
What do you get when you combine a dominant ground game, a solid defense and an untested third string quarterback?
If you answered either the Houston Texans or The Aristocrats, I will accept it.
The Texans are a fascinating matchup for any number of reasons. They're 8-3 and have put together a strong defense after having one of the worst in the NFL a year ago. They lost Matt Schaub for the year and then lost backup Matt Leinart halfway through his first start. They now have T.J. Yates at quarterback, but make up for that with the hydra that is noted philosopher Arian Foster and fellow back Ben Tate.
Given that the Falcons have a dominant run defense, this looks like a winnable game. But the Texans didn't get to 8-3 by accident and will be one of the biggest challenges left on the schedule for the 7-4 Falcons. That's going to be true even if Matt Ryan remains in prime form and the run defense can work its usual magic. It'll even be true if T.J. (predictably) struggles a bit.
After the jump, one big question, three smaller ones and a prediction for the game.
The Biggest Question
Will the Falcons have success moving the ball against a very competent Texans defense?
This is a big question. The Texans have 35 sacks and 13 interceptions this year and are ranked first overall in total defense, and that's without Super Mario Williams for much of the year. The addition of cornerback Jonathan Joseph helped them out in a big way, and their generally young D has gelled nicely. They are one of the most effective defenses in the league, to put a fine point on it.
The Falcons have had mixed success against quality defenses in 2011. When they can't get Michael Turner going, they lean heavily on the pass game. That worked very well against a kitten-like Vikings pass defense, but a one-dimensional game won't fly in Houston. The Falcons will have to dig in with a balanced attack to come out of this one alive.
The good news is that the team is capable of doing so. Matt Ryan has steadily improved as the season has ground on, as has Roddy White and the Falcons' pass protection. With Turner grinding out yardage, they should be able to make something happen.
Don't expect this one to be turnover-free, however. The Texans have forced close to 50 this season and will be gunning hard for more.
Three Smaller Questions
Question One: Can the Falcons stop Arian Foster and Ben Tate?
The Texans' two-headed rushing attack is arguably their best asset. Foster takes a pounding week-in, week-out as the bellcow back, but he's been a little less effective as a runner in 2011 than his breakout 2010. He's a brilliant pass-catcher out of the backfield, however, and the Falcons will have to account for that with their linebackers.
Tate is virtually no threat as a receiver, but he's a powerful runner who has eaten away at Foster's carry total this season and is currently averaging over five yards a carry. He's a genuine threat.
The Falcons have a borderline elite run defense this season, but have struggled to stop power runners and receivers out of the backfield. Both of those issues will be fully exploited by the Texans, so Brian Van Gorder will have to scheme creatively to take care of the Foster & Tate Show.
Question Two: How will T.J. Yates do against the Falcons' depleted secondary?
With Brent Grimes out and Kelvin Hayden also unlikely to play, the Falcons will be down to Dunta Robinson, Chris Owens, Dominique Franks and Darrin Walls at cornerback. It's an ideal time for T.J. Yates to be facing them.
The problem is that Yates is a bit of an unknown. He's got excellent size and a decent arm, and there were some draft analysts who considered him a major sleeper. But he's still a bit raw and the Texans aren't going to ask him to do much more than check down to Foster and find crazily elite wide receiver Andre Johnson on Sunday.
It ought to be interesting to see if Yates can put together a decent game against the Falcons' secondary, or if they'll ravage him regardless.
Question Three: Will Michael Turner be healthy?
Red flags went up all over my brainscape when I saw that Turner was nursing a groin injury. There's almost no chance the team holds him out of this game, but I do have to wonder if he's going to be 100%.
Given the Texans' defense, it might be a wise idea to not take any chances in the first place. Give Turner 15 carries or so if he's running reasonably well and get Jacquizz Rodgers more involved. He's the bigger home run threat and will help take a little heat off of Turner, at least in my reckoning.
Prediction
Not to sound like a total homer, but I think with the Texans short Matt Schaub and Matt Leinart, the Falcons can pull this one out. Gonna be awfully close, though. I'll say 24-21 Falcons.
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Their defence without Turner healthy scares me
I have no issues thinking we’ll crack down on the run/short passing game, but I’m really worried of how our offense will function without Turner. This is the chance to see what Quizz can do with a much increased load, but I’m still pretty worried about their D when we’re missing the power ground threat.
Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.
Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17
by Turner_The_Burner on Dec 2, 2011 8:45 AM EST reply actions
Mattys gonna see the ground a lot.
But, we atleast know one thing..they’re gonna have to stick to the ground. I dont expect big numbers from anyone on our offense. This will be a low scoring game and I’m guessing the final to be 17-13 falcons.
by dirtybirds233 on Dec 2, 2011 9:37 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I like quick slants and screens to Julio Jones and Harry Douglas
make this a big YAC game to slow down the pass rush and challenge their 3-4 defense
know what you believe in and why you believe in it
Just hoping we don't look like The Aristocrats
by NeedATicketToTheGame on Dec 2, 2011 9:47 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Its become apparent that rushing defense
Has always been a dominant problem to solve.From seeing what a good rush leads to I sure do hope we can generate something to spook the newbie.I would hate to see the headlines if he gets busy.“Virgin QB Stuns team.It won’t happen(KOW).Maybe Ja Quizz gets busy himself and the headlines will read ’Short Man Cowers Texas Team”
by JT131 on Dec 2, 2011 10:05 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Texans fan perspective:
I think you are pretty much dead on.
The biggest problem with guessing the outcome of this game is that we simply have no clue about TJ Yates.
He actually looked good in pre-season, much better than Leinart did in fact……but that’s pre-season so who knows what the hell that means. If pre-season meant anything, the Niners would be 2-9.
Last week they didn’t expect Yates to play, so they put a leash on him when he went in and he handed the ball off most fo the second half and we let our defense win the game for us.
I actually like this game, NOT because I think we will win, but because you guys have a good run defense, meaning the coaches will HAVE to let Yates throw the ball, and frankly, I want to see that so we can figure out what we have with him.
I am going to go with Falcons win 28-20. My reasoning is that I think we see alot of three and outs, at least one Yates interception, and the coaches will still be reluctant to open up the playbook entirely with him right now.
Those factors mean our defense is going to be on the field way to much.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
wow
it’s rare that we see an opposing team fan coming here and predicting our win. at least you’re not being a homer. This matchup is one of the toughest for the Falcons regardless of who’s playing QB for the Texans. We’ve faced some rookies this season in Newton, Ponder, and Locker – and made them all look awesome.
well, you guys are winning your division and have good chances of even getting a first round bye. and we need this one really bad.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
Unless BVG changes schemes completely
then Yates is going to have a good day againts our pass D, just like every other rookie or marginal QB we’ve played so far this year. People focus on Andre Johnson as a concern for the pass D but Houston has two pretty decent TE’s. Dreesen and Daniels are a pretty good duo and will help Yates out a lot on Sunday. The offset for ATL is that they are 3rd in the league at covering TE’s but that was without the current DB/S injuries.
I think ATL’s “new” OL will do better against HST’s pass rush than the line we started the year with. I am concerned to hear that MT has a groin injury. HST’s rushing D DVOA is 11th so we could get good runs against them but that is with a healthy MT. We might get to see how Quizz can handle more than four carries in a game.
I’m going to predict another ATL blowout at 23-17.
Well our DVOA against #1 receivers is 30th in the league
TE’s is 3rd and RB’s is 13th.
I’d be more concerned with Andre Johnson and Foster out of the backfield based on those numbers.
"People in this country used to look at a successful person and ask what can I do to have that kind of sucess. Now a lot of people look at a successful person and ask what can I do to take what he has."
- Tommy Beam
I focused on the TE's first
because typically young QB’s tend to use the TE’s a lot because of the routes and security of the throws.
I do agree that Johnson and Foster but with a rookie QB ATL could easily double up on Johnson and reduce his effectiveness. Foster is an issue but split his coverage with Spoon and the SS and it should help reduce his big receiving plays
If BVG has a brain...
he’ll look at what they do in the first half, if not the first quarter. With a third-string quarterback, they’re going to try to limit his choice of plays. Chances are, we’ll see some of the same ones. If we fall prey to them early, we should be able to adjust for them in the second half. If we fall prey to them again, shame on us.
Texans fan here
I find this to be a very fair assessment and a fair prediction. I do think our QB situation ultimately gives you the edge. This should be a hard fought and tough game for us, and I think the Falcons ultimately win it.
Cheers to a great article. There are some seriously bad football blogs on SB Nation (Music City Miracles comes to mind…) and some really good ones as well. From what I’ve read this week, the Falcoholic is definitely one of the good ones.
by WhiskeyR on Dec 2, 2011 11:29 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
nice compliment for this blog
I dont spend too much time at all on other team blogs because of my interet time limit my mother imposes on me, but you guys have class.
One day....
by Kashberry on Dec 2, 2011 12:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Hahaha
I know where the bodies are buried.....I buried some of them myself. - David Stern
by a hooter's baby on Dec 2, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions
Texan fan here too.
The thing that gets to me is, who will be covering arian out of the backfield LB’s or safeties? I am hope the texans use alot of tate in this game simply because he brings that nasty run game. He will just run and run and run. We need that kind of day to win.
Sean Weatherspoon
is the answer. he eats running backs coming out of the backfield alive.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
by Gemini-RU on Dec 2, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Let's examine the Texans wins
It’s easy to get caught up in numbers, as they’re a great shortcut to assessing a team. And no doubt, the Texans defense has improved dramatically. However, to properly assess how the Falcons will do, I think it helps to look at who Houston has beat this year to see if there’s a pattern:
1. 34-7 over Indy: At the beginning of the season, this looked like a tough one. But we now know that Indy without Peyton is little more than a HS football team.
2. 23-13 over Miami: This is the Miami that started the season 0-7.
3. 17-10 over Pittsburgh: This was a quality win, for sure. They held Big Ben to a little over 200 yards in the air.
4. 41-7 over Tennessee: The Titans are hard to figure out. But, Texans took this one in Tennessee and putting up 41 is always a tough thing to do in the NFL.
5. 24-14 over Jacksonville: The Jags are another struggling team with a rookie QB.
6. 30-12 over Cleveland: Browns looked promising early on, but McCoy is not what you’d consider a tier-1 QB.
7. 37-9 over Tampa Bay: As Falcons fans know, the Bucs were predicted to be a pretty good team this year. And though we dropped a game to them in Tampa, Tampa has a pretty terrible defense.
8. 20-13 over Jacksonville: This was probably the game that ended Del Rio’s time with the Jags.
So – if I look over this list, the most impressive win was over the Steelers. The Titans win also stands out for it’s blowout numbers, but the remaining wins have come against teams with struggling offenses and defenses.
So, while they’re defense is impressive, the Falcons will be one of the more complete offenses they’ll face this year. The birds have a QB who is hitting his stride, a solid backfield with a power-back and a shifty scat-back, a perennial pro-bowl receiver, a hall-of-fame tight end and a rookie receiver who is so fast, space-time bends around him.
Additionally, the three Houston losses were to New Orleans (at NO), Oakland (at Houston) and Baltimore (at Baltimore) – so, no shame in those losses. But if you look at those teams, they are teams that feature good running games and use the play action in their passing game. FYI – the Falcons are one of the best play action teams in the league, with Ryan completing nearly 78% of his passes coming off of PA.
I think this will be a tough game, especially being on the road. But one other statistic stands out to me: Mike Smith’s Falcons are undefeated against rookie QBs (I believe he’s 8-0).
I’m predicting a score of 17-10, with the Falcons and Texans both ending up 8-4.
by The DW on Dec 2, 2011 12:13 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Great list that boosts my confidence, though i know we cant predict games simply by who beat who. But even the steelers struggled out of the gate early on.
One day....
by Kashberry on Dec 2, 2011 12:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with everything you said
except the stat at the end is basically meaningless. Its more of an ESPN type “Did you know” stat than something that will affect the outcome of the game.
If you're referring to the rookie QB stat
I’d say yes and no. It is akin to the “Mike Smith is undefeated on Thursdays in November” type of stat, but it could speak to the philosophy behind how they approach rookie QBs.
It’s certainly not a predictor stat, for sure, but I do think it speaks about the philosophy you’ll see the Falcons defense employ in this game.
To be fair
we had zero tape (and zero expectations to play against) Kafka and Locker. I’d be willing to bet that makes at least a small difference. When you prepare for an old, immobile QB with an average arm (Hasslebeck) and he goes down and is replaced by a Brees-ish mobile QB sporting a rail gun, it throws the D off.
Mobile QBs have been the death of us though.
But in my estimation, it would be easier to go from defending mobile to not-mobile than the other way around.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 7:33 PM EST up reply actions
I am really tired
of hearing about zero tape or no prep time as an excuse for our D getting torched by back up QB’s. That is the fault of the DC for not being able to adjust immediately. You rush the new guy and stick the coverages. Get in there and hit him. It doesn’t seem like back up QB’s have the same effect on teams with good D’s.
I'm not saying it's totally game altering.
We’re still playing football at the end of the day.
But when it’s a drastic change in playstyle, it can throw defenses off. You spend all week studying the nuances of a single QB, only to have it all thrown out the window.
The DC has to learn on the fly, too, and even then, those backups have made good throws.
It’s not totally on our end. Those guys have a responsibility to make plays for their teams, too. They still have their RBs and their WRs who can still make things happen. It doesn’t always turn into a sudden borefest because we sack them 10 times, as much as we’d like it to be.
And I don’t think we’re the only team who suffers from this problem. Yeah, we notice it because it’s our team, but I’d be willing to bet it’s happened to other teams.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
Love the list
I feel significantly better knowing they they have beaten one good team.
by Falconzfan284 on Dec 3, 2011 2:50 AM EST up reply actions
The biggest question should be
Will BVG or Smith or whoever is calling the defense, actually give Yates the rookie treatment and blitz him to death?
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
I think the question is
can you get to the QB even if you blitz, the sack numbers this year say no. However, I agree if you can get significant pressure on Yates, it will go a long way toward winning this game.
by Bobbythegreat on Dec 2, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
Trap game
We are missing a lot of players too. I’m concerned about this one.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Dec 2, 2011 12:20 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I wouldn't call this a trap game
because Houston is 8-3, has a great defense and offensive weapons. All Yates has to do is get the ball to Foster, Tate, Johnson, the TE’s and not turn the ball over. ATL has not done well in QB pressure or take aways this season. If ATL can do either, I’d prefer a lot of QB pressure, then they have a good chance of winning the game. HST’s OL is 7th in the league at pass blocking with an adjusted sack rate of 5% for 16 sacks. ATL will need to have some blitz schemes ready to get to Yates.
I’d call TB or CAR trap games – loosing records and poor defenses.
True.
Just meant that everyone else os saying how easy it’s gonna be because of Yates.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Dec 2, 2011 1:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with you
on that one. This is not going to be an easy game unless the coaching staff comes out with new schemes on both sides of the ball. What are the chances of that?
Well, we need JJ to be more than a decoy.
And quizz to get a good load of carries.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Dec 2, 2011 2:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
It's possible.
It depends on how you define scheme. If you mean “scheme” as in “formation” or packs of formations, it’s possible.
Even the tiniest of changes can still make a difference in how a play is defended or how a defense shows itself, and Roddy has said we run a ton of formations with only a handful of plays.
If Turner is really injured (which sucks all to high hell), then I hope we’ll see a huge dose of Quizz this week. Turner was on ESPN earlier this week and talked pretty good about Quizz. It was cool.
Defensively, I have no idea. Seems less likely that we’d see a change on D, aside from just some blitz variations.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 7:37 PM EST up reply actions
"Trap Game"
Typically means we’re looking forward to the next game and, therefore, underprepare for this one. I don’t see that here. We play the Panthers on the road next week and, while I don’t want to underestimate the difficulty of that meeting, I don’t think it constitutes a consideration as a “trap game.” The Texans have a great defense, probably (and certainly, if you believe in stats) better than ours. I think if our offense can perform against one of the best defenses in the league, we win.
We won't look past this game.
The Texans are far too talented for that. However, Smitty is too smart of a coach to let it happen. He’ll have them ready.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
I was being ironic
it is not possible unless the staff changes four years of history in one week. There might be different plays or coverages here or there but ATL will revert to what the OC and DC know the best.
I feel you
All they know is stubbornness. The catch is that at least BVG’s defense has been improving.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
i agree with the improvement
take rbs receiving out of the backfield. forte burned us first game. however in the saints game we focused on it and took sproles out of the game. hopefully we hold up against the run like we are capable of, dont let screens go for big plays, and force tj yates to beat us and we should be fine
It's usually mostly on the signal caller to figure the protection
And his compusure and accuracy are in question
Atlanta will win a championship....someday
Good points about their defense getting turnovers. Our O has been good with the ball as of late. It would be nice to see zero turnovers against the number 1 defense.
Turners health is scary… And i agree that rodgers should get more carries. Even when turner is healthy. Rodgers is little beastly and needs more carries so thr falcons can see what he can and cant really do.
Fire mm if we dont win a superbowl this year. Get someone who can consistently do something with these weapons and also someone who hasnt coached the bills before
One day....
by Kashberry on Dec 2, 2011 12:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions
MM can't always compensate for Matt's weaknesses.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Dec 2, 2011 1:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Texan's Offense
I do not see the Texan’s putting up 21 points on us with no quarterback (based on what I saw from TJ Yates last week). I will say though that I have some buddies out in Houston who say that Kubiak has been a big Yates fan since the start of the season and that there was some article saying he picked up the offense faster than any other QB on the roster (including Schaub).
You shouldn't base your judgement of Yates on what you saw
in the second half of last week’s game, the coach admitted that he shut the offense down in order to ensure that Yates wouldn’t get hurt because he didn’t want to have to put in his FB at QB if by some fluke Yates went down as well.
by Bobbythegreat on Dec 2, 2011 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
How is your guys special teams?
Has anybody ran one back on you guys? How good is your kicker? We only lost to Oak because of that freak of a leg Janowski.
No returns I believe.
Except for the Percy Harvin ALMOST return, idiot shouldn’t have tried that stiff arm.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Dec 2, 2011 2:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Our field goal kicker is excellent.
Only missed one this year, and before that miss, had the longest consecutive make streak in the NFL.
Our punter started the season miserably, but has gotten better each week. He averaged 50 yards a punt last week, if I recall correctly.
Our punter is our kickoff guy. He usually boots the ball about 5 yards deep. Our coverage is good, aside from the one Percy Harvin return, it’s been good. And even then, Harvin didn’t score. (Longest non-scoring play in history)
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Dec 2, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions
kinda weird in a mirror image way
in 2007 it was Matt Schaub versus back up running backs and receivers.
Now in 2011, it’s the first string offense with the back up of back up QBs.
In who gives a $&@k news,
JPW was moved to the active roster off the practice squad. Guess we were afraid our lil noodle armed gem was gonna be snatched up by a QB needy team. Welcome back space waster!!
I feel the same
I guess they just didn’t want to be w/out a 3rd QB that knows the system for the rest of the year.
Agreed
Can’t stand the guy and the suspension is definitely deserved, but I was also hoping he’d eat Drew Brees for a snack on Sunday night.
There was going to be no way he would have had the suspension reversed and gotten no suspension
They were hoping for one game and time served(1/2 the pack game) so even in the best case scenario he would have missed the saint game. Would gave been nice to see him collapse the pocket but since he’s and idiot, I say ha haaa again.
Bad thing for our division champs dream
But I’m still glad to see that punk suspended
by FLA_Falcon on Dec 2, 2011 4:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
FIFTY turnovers forced by the texans d?
im calling shenanigans on that one…or a typo.
by throw it down the fugging field matt on Dec 2, 2011 11:06 PM EST reply actions
The Texans have
21 takeaways this year, I don’t know where the 50 number came from.
by Bobbythegreat on Dec 3, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions

by 



















