Falcons-Colts Recap: Business As Usual
I'll admit, I was a wee bit nervous about this game. The Colts had played some inspired games in the past, and I worried that they'd put it all together and make us look the fool.
Thankfully, The Real Falcons showed up and quickly put those worries to bed, thanks largely to the Julio Jones Show, which is growing in legend every week. Soon he'll be able to sit on the bench and watch himself score touchdowns while simultaneously scoring the touchdown. And feed the hungry. And be faster than a speeding bullet (Did you see him outrun everyone and their brother on the Colts defense? I giggled like a little girl.).
I've been busy with school lately, and UGA and the Falcons delivered this weekend with a couple of easy-goers which made for a happy weekend.
As always, let's talk specifics after the jump!
The Good
Good grief, Julio Jones. You're a boss. And you're fast as all get out, too. Two touchdowns of 50+ yards in one game, the first rookie WR to do that since Randy Moss. Yeah, that's some elite company right there. Keep it up, boss man. You'll be in Falcons lore before you know it if you keep this up.
The Whole Defense: Look, I know it was Curtis Painter and the hapless Colts, but you guys didn't allow a single point to the Colts. Not even in garbage time! That's impressive, I don't care who you are. A great effort by all three facets of the D. Dunta laid some vicious hits (none of which were penalized) and Grimes was, once again, not heard from for the most part. That's a good thing. The LB corps was as good as ever. Lofton had a forced fumble, Spoon was everywhere, and Nicholas was invisible, which in his case, is a good thing.
I saw you, Abe and Ray Edwards. Don't worry, your efforts did not go unnoticed. Same for you, El Sid and Beerman. The four of you were wreaking havoc on the edges. Yeah, you guys didn't get any sacks, but you scared the mess out of Painter and either forced an errant throw or forced him right into the loving arms of USS Angry Babs and Corey Peters. I'll take it. Great stuff.
Matt Ryan's Second Half: I tell you, when Matty Ice is on, he's on. He's as good as any QB (except maybe Rodgers) when he's on. That being said, we need him to be "on" more often. The offense seems to be very rhythm based. Once we settle into a groove, we tend to be darn near unstoppable. If we have a hiccup in there, it's like missing teeth on a gear. Things get ugly when that happens. I'm fully convinced now that Matt needs to run the no-huddle 100% of the time.
I say that not because I think Matt calls a superior game to Mularkey, but because of the fact that Matt has an extremely high football intelligence. He knows what to call based on what the D gives him. He, along with most of the players, know the entirety of the offense. It removes the guessing aspect of calling an offensive play against a defensive alignment. In truth, there's no real way to combat it defensively except try and pick up on the offense's terminology, among other things, or hope your DC guesses correctly a bunch of times.
$$$$ Bryant: Still the man. Nothing more needs to be said.
Matt Bosher, the Revived Punter: Well I'll tell you what, Bosher kicked the ball effectively yesterday. I was surprised he was capable of doing it, but he did. He got some darn good punts off, and his kickoffs were good as well. They had the roof open at Lucas Oil Stadium, too. It wasn't totally covered, so there was definitely some air flow in there. It was also about 60 degrees. Pretty sure colder air makes footballs fly less.....freely.
Quizz: Quizz, you are a fun running back to watch. You're way faster than I ever expected and, in spite of your stature, you refuse to go down! You were dragging people all over the place. I loved how they utilized your quickness to run you outside, and it worked pretty well. When you turned the corner on that pitch to the right on the goal line, I thought for sure you had your first pro TD. I see plenty of those in your future. Keep at it, Quizz.
Turner: Turner, you were effective, if unspectacular. We'll ride you into the ground this year, I'm sure.
The OL: Aside from one holding penalty, the OL was relatively good. I believe we only gave up one sack, and Matty was kept clean for most of the game. Freeney and Mathis can still play, and you know those guys are playing for pride.
The Bad
Matty's First Half: Wildly inconsistent, errant throws were masked by the Julio Jones show, but we used our base offense a good bit, too. I think he'll get that ironed out. Not really worried. That pick 6 had blame that went around, but it happens.
The Offense's Utilization of Talent: I feel so bad for HD. He's a good athlete and a good receiver, but we're not even bothering to throw to him. I mean, he might be a 30-40 catch a year for 500 yards kind of guy, but we're not even giving him that. He's a deep threat as well and a capable slot receiver. And Quizz! He needs more carries. I think he's the real deal and, while he might never be a feature back, we should certainly use him more. Heck, if Darren Sproles can have 50 receptions thus far, Quizz can have at least 2/3 of that. We just don't use our RBs right, if you ask me.
The Ugly
There wasn't anything ugly about this game. It was a good game, one we probably won't have a repeat of until next season, so enjoy it while it lasts.
Game MVP: Julio Jones. I love Spoon, he's been awesome this year (Love his celebration) but Julio was a superstar yesterday. An absolutely awesome performance.
Sounds of the Game: I'm going to continue Dave's hip hop doodah trend and offer a song called Dirty Birds Fly. It's a really neat song and it's on iTunes. All the proceeds from iTunes purchases go to help cure ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease).
In a Word: Breezy.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This was not business as usual
Every year under the current coaching staff ATL has gone on the road and played to the level of their competition. The IND game could have been a trap but ATL took care of business, which they have had problems with in the past when playing less than stellar teams.
That being said ATL did things against IND that would have cost them games against better teams, like NO. They are still playing that good ole prevent offense. But, a win is a win.
Had they run the prevent offense
We would’ve won by 10, not 24.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Nov 7, 2011 6:07 PM EST up reply actions
Oh really
How many points did ATL score in the second half? Was it 10? How many on the 4th quarter? Was that three? Do you not call that a prevent offense? If not then please tell me Caleb what was it? Did IND’s D all of a sudden figure out ATL’s offense?
Did you want us to win 62-7?
Feels like you’re just trying to start an argument, here.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Nov 7, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
I want ATL to play like a playoff contender
each game no matter whom they play. I want to see them play a complete game for four quarters.
If disagreeing with you is starting an arguement then go somewhere else.
You regularly poke at me.
As to why you do that, I do not know. You’re entitled to your opinion. Yours seems to always differ from mine.
But we looked fine against the Colts. Don’t forget, the Patriots, a playoff contender, lost in miserable fashion this week. The Steelers, a playoff contender, lost in miserable fashion this week.
All playoff teams still lose games. That doesn’t change anything. The Packers, undefeated as they are, have still been in positions to lose, they just haven’t lost yet.
And I’d disagree on that plays should be run during games. That stuff shows up on film, and then the Saints have to prepare for it. The counter to that is that if you show enough plays, the Saints will have too much to prepare for and miss some of the basics.
They hold practices for that. As to how often ATL does it, who knows? There’s no one that has insider access to that kind of information.
Also, the best time to “practice” a play is not in a game. It’s in practice. If you haven’t gotten the play down to where you can run it at any point during the game, you shouldn’t be running it in a game. That leads to mistakes, which leads to turnovers, which leads to easy Saints points, and no matter how much you disagree with me, I think we can both agree that Saints points = bad.
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Nov 8, 2011 1:05 AM EST up reply actions
You can disagree all you want
about when to practice a play. Practicing a play only during practice means little during a game, it’s just better than not running it at all. During a game it’s real time against players that will level a NFL quality hit and try to dissect the play. In practice, especially with the new rules, it’s a controlled environment with less value that it use to have. A play working in practice is NO gaurantee of it working in a game.
Yes it will be on film but that is the case unless you never run a play. Do the Saints never repeat a play? Come on, that rational is antiquated. NO has a stable of plays where they dare you to stop them. That stable is geared toward getting big yards and scoring points. ATL’s stable is MT up the middle,
I don’t see where that last paragraph came from. I said practice the plays in the IND game. A game well under control and if ATL made a mistake they could recover. No, do not practice against a team like NO that can take advantage of a mistake and ATL would never be able to catch up. I never mixed those two. That is one reason why I disagree with you often.
Atlanta built a comfortable lead
and kinda shut down the offense. There’s no need for a 62-7 win, when 31-7 counts just as much.
That's fine
and I don’t disagree. My point was, and is, even though some people want to say I’m starting and arguement, is to open up the O and work on some different plays. They don’t have to be successful in a blowout but you try them. ATL did that some in the first half but shut it down after half time. The second half was a perfect time to practice for NO.
Or a perfect time to show them absolutely nothing
If you’ve got plays designed to beat New orleans, don’t show them the plays until gameday. I understand your point, and I wouldn’t of had an issue with getting a few more plays off in the last half, but I liked that they got Snelling and Quizz in once the game was done, and gave nothing away for next week.
Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.
Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17
by Turner_The_Burner on Nov 7, 2011 10:28 PM EST up reply actions
That is a good point
but how often, or successfully has ATL done that? I hope you’re right but the best time to practice a play is during a game.
I gotta agree...
31-7 was the worst home loss IND has had since Peyton’s 1st year (or year before his 1st year, can’t recall exactly, but that’s still pretty darn impressive). Sure we could’ve thrown the playbook at them even when leading by 3 touches, but not only is that just not MS’s style, next week we play NO people in the most important game of the year thus far. No need to show them too much, especially since we had the game in hand. And, probably learning a couple things from the SEA game, we kept the pedal down ON DEFENSE this time, resulting in no need to change shorts after some damn last second kick that shoulda never meant anything. Yeah guys, we gotta be happy with this one…for a day or 2…now, to work on demoralizing the Saints
"And this here's the TV. Two hours a day, either educational or football, so you don't ruin your appreciation of the finer things." - H.I.
by 4thabirds on Nov 8, 2011 8:12 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Yea, MS has too much class to run it up on INDY.
But NO is a different story. If we have the chance, I would love to see us pop 50+ on their ass.
I NEVER said run up the score
was that mentioned in any of my posts? No. I said I would have liked to see the O try some new plays since the game was in hand. If mistaked were made it wouldn’t have cost them the game. Trying new plays does not mean scoring more points.
It seems that my idea is counter to most of the board so I won’t mention it again.
Great game
But at this point I just want to move on to the Saints. I am so pumpde for that game.
Speaking of HD, he’s on 19 receptions at the moment (mostly due to JJ’s injury), but how is his contract structured? I know I’d be getting pretty frustrated if I was him – you’d have to think Ryan’s looks goes White/JJ, then the other one, then Tony G, then HD. We definitely need to get it to him more, that was the whole point of getting JJ was to spread the D thin….not capitalising.
Be sure to check out this week's Best Case/Worst Case article here.
Follow me on Twitter! @HarrisonN17
by Turner_The_Burner on Nov 7, 2011 6:13 PM EST reply actions
We are an offense/fan base splitting in two different directions.
We can’t run turner 20+ times a game with turner AND get white, jones, Douglas, and Gonzalez pro bowl numbers plus involve Snelling and quizz in the passing game. It’s a good problem to have but the players and fans both know we have so much talent on offense with only one ball to go around. We have to have a few every game key guys and then have guys gameplanned in for certain looks and others waiting in the wings in case someone else goes down.
Or we could jettison turner and move to a more Pats/Colts type offense and not have much of a ground game to speak of.
by FLA_Falcon on Nov 7, 2011 6:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Green Ellis is a pretty dependable back for them.
But they have one of the best QBs in the league, so they don’t need a running game. :(
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/FalcoholicZippo
If you're a fan of the Falcons, or if you want to chat it up with some Falcons fans, sign up here, share your opinion, and get to know some great fans of the Falcons!
by Caleb Rutherford on Nov 7, 2011 8:14 PM EST up reply actions
I wasn't meanin ditch turner because we don't need a running back
He just first really fit that type of offense as well as Snelling or Quizz. I honestly believe Ryan can be the next Brady or Manning if we were to switch to that type of offense and give him a great OL like they have had in the past.
My main point was we can’t pound the rock and sling it all over the field at the sane time. There just inst enough time in the game unless our offense steps up the tempo and our d gets 3 and outs nearly every drive
by FLA_Falcon on Nov 7, 2011 8:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I hate autocorrect.
First = doesn’t.
by FLA_Falcon on Nov 7, 2011 8:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
How do you define "not much of a ground game"?
Is it by total yards or effectiveness? Right now NE’s rushing DVOA is 4th, it was second for 2010, ninth for 2009 and 4th in 2008. In 2010 Ellis was ranked 2nd in rushing DVOA. IN 2008 and 2009 I don’t think NE had a RB that rushed for over 1000 yards.
I had rather have a running attack the accumulated fewer yards but was more effective. ATL could do that but they’d have to change their approach to the passing game.
NE sets up the run with the pass. We do the exact opposite.
For their style of play, they have to put up huge points in every game to win. Their defense is just a stop gap until the O can get back on the field. Winding the clock with our running game allows our defense to be more effective (fresh). Also keeps other offenses off the field. Both philosophies have their upside and downside. I think that ATL has the personell on offense to run either approach, but we tend to stick with what has worked in the past, ground out the clock.
Good points
but there is one glaring difference between the execution of the two. NE’s approach, and NO does the same thing, leads to much more effective running game. Right now ATL’s rushing DVOA is 22nd. That could change as ATL’s O becomes more efficient at passing the ball down the field but they have a long way to go at this point.
NE D has only been a “stop gap” as of late. It wasn’t long ago when they has pretty good defenses.
The simple reason Quizz won't ever become Sproles is MM
Even when Sproles was in SD, he was poorly used. Running him up the middle, an every down back, overused. Luckily, Quizz won’t ever be overused with MM at the helm but look at how the saints are using Sproles. Getting him outside…in space…dump offs…a rare run up the middle to throw the opposition…sorry about the pauses, thinking of this makes me a bit peeved. We did that yesterday, surprisingly. But will we continue to do it? MM is just so stupidly arrogant I wouldn’t doubt we’ll see Quizz up the middle again…and again.
by aces666high on Nov 7, 2011 6:30 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
I’m actually curious to see what Turner would look like if they practiced swing passes. Think corners would be willing to take on Turner 1 on1?
by PurpleDRANKnotJUICE on Nov 7, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
If Turner would stop treating a pass thrown to him like his mortal enemy he'd be scary catching out of the backfield
As of now, think he’s as shocked as anyone the ball isn’t on the ground. If he could realize his hands are his friends and the ball isn’t the devil, he could become a poor man’s Sjax. And that isn’t bad.
I kinda have a feeling quiz is gonna start getting reps.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Nov 7, 2011 7:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I just watched that 80yrd catch/run over and over.
He turned on a dime running full speed, he made that fool miss. Awesome play.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Nov 7, 2011 7:46 PM EST via mobile reply actions

by 






















