Sean Weatherspoon Is Signed, Now Where Will He Play?
Step right up, ladies and gentlemen, and get to know the Mouth of the South, the defending Twitter champion, Sean Weatherspoon!
Obviously, I'm thrilled to finally get our first round pick under contract, just a day before the official start of training camp. There won't be any animosity here, and 'Spoon can really get enough work under his belt to challenge for a starting job. This is what I've been eagerly anticipating.
As commenter LORD91 noted, he received an indication from 'Spoon himself via (what else?) Twitter earlier this off-season, saying he'd be signing in late July. While that seemed like a good guess to begin with, it's nice to know that he was never planning a long-term holdout.
But that aside, the question that I keep seeing people ask is where he's going to play. No-brainer.
A disturbing number of publications are confidently predicting that 'Spoon is going to unseat Stephen Nicholas. Some of those act like it's the only outcome that makes any sense, turning Nickels into a super-sub. Others suggest he may not even start. We've covered this.
He's probably going to take some snaps away from Stephen Nicholas, but he's likely to really cut down on Mike Peterson's snaps by the end of the season.. He may struggle in his rookie campaign, but Peterson's Veteran Guile and Moxie don't make up for his declining skillset. 'Spoon is ridiculously energetic and talented, and now that he's to camp on time, he's going to make a real push for significant playing time immediately.
The biggest roadblock to Wizardspoon ripping out opposing players' livers and eating them with fava beans and a nice Chianti? His ability to stop the run, something Peterson still has a reputation—albeit a not completely accurate one—for being able to do. He may also want to avoid Tweeting after every tackle, but we'll take this thing one step at a time.
Oh, and so you don't think I forgot about the terms of the contract, it's extremely reasonable. If Little Spoon performs as well as I think he's going to, five years and $17.5 million is an outright steal, and we may not get all the way to the end of that without a re-negotiation. If he manages to maul a few quarterbacks on his way there, I'll be happy to see the Falcons give it to him.
Talk 'Spoon!
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Glad I'm not the only one who notices
the assumption that Spoobie Miles will take Nicholas’ spot. It’s baffling, and it makes me wonder how much thought these writers are actually giving to this.
His ability to stop the run, something Peterson still has a reputation—albeit a not completely accurate one—for being able to do.
So true.
He was miserable against the run in the New England, Washington, Carolina (week 10), and NO (week 14) games last year.
He had positive value vs the run in the Miami and Buffalo games, and to be fair, he was pretty stout vs the run in ’08. Nonetheless, his skill set is clearly declining.
He and Brian Williams are in my opinion of the same mold. Writers are factoring them in their predictions because they don’t know any better.
Rec'd
I would like to see Spoon replace Peterson as soon as possible. Even if the rookie makes some mistakes on the field it won’t be worse than some of the gaffs from Peterson last season. My only question will be how Spoon adjusts to NFL pass coverage.
I agree but rookie LB does not mean trouble necessarily
steroid issues aside, Cushing had a phenomenal year, he was not just the best defensive rookie last year but he was one of the best LBs in the NFL. If Spoon has that kind of potential have him start over Peterson and bring Peterson in on 3rd downs.
know what you believe in and why you believe in it
by MentallyMIA on Jul 30, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Don't forget Lofton, he had a solid rookie year as well.
"Ryan, under center. Single receiver set, to either side. Ryan, gonna throw. First professional pass.....CAUGHT!! Jenkins! 30! 25! 20! 15! 10! 5! He lives in Atlanta!!!" -Wes Durham
Well
take away the steroids and lets see how Cushing plays. You cannot say “steroid issue aside” until he has a season without them under his belt. Remember, steroids are called “performance enhancers” for a reason.
steroids are not
athletes are athletes and what makes a good linebacker is instincts and ability to make reads, steroids do nothing for the head on your shoulders. I personally do not believe that the steroids were the reason Cushing had such a good year, but you are right, physically, they helped. The amount of time the Texans defense spends on the field definitely helped also , but the kid still is a very smart football player (though I can’t say the same for his off the field decision making) – but let’s not get into a steroid debate.
know what you believe in and why you believe in it
by MentallyMIA on Jul 30, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
ignore the "steroids are not" part (the title)...
know what you believe in and why you believe in it
You are right about instincts
but instincts don’t matter if you’re not fast enough to catch the guy with the ball or not strong enough to shed a block. I guess we’ll see whenever he gets back on the field.
Instincts are like intangibles
It’s actually very important to me for a player to success, but yes, there has to be some balance of athleticism, intelligent, and desire/determination to do the job right. All are important elements. Believe it or not Athleticisim is actually the lowest tier of the bunch, but still important.
I belong to NO ONE...and no one belongs to ME.
by brotherbrown on Jul 31, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
gotta be peterson's snaps that are endangered...
bottom line:
Nicholas is young with upside potential while Peterson is on the other side of that peak, coasting his way down towards retirement. What makes more sense? I think the answer should be obvious…
I have no vampire experience, but I have hunted werewolves. I shot one once, but by the time I got there, it had turned back into my neighbor's dog.
I completely agree
I think it’s silly to think that Nicholas is the one in danger. Nicholas is still young and this will be only his second season without distractions (for those who don’t know, his baby son had a serious heart condition his rookie year. he flew to boston and back every week to be with his son while he waited for a transplant. i’m happy to report that his son got a transplant and is healthy and doing well.)
He may not have Lofton talent, but he’s certainly not a slouch. I also believe he’ll improve this year.
Spoon is more suited for the Sam LB because, to my knowledge, that was the one BVG had dropping into pass coverage/rushing the passer most of the time, something that fits Spoon’s speedy skill set.
However, if Smitty keeps Peterson over Nicholas, and it looks like he’d go with B. Williams over Owens/Grimes, then we might be discovering a huge fault in our coach, and I’m not going to lie here, that thought scares me. HOWEVER, I don’t think Smitty will make a decision like that, but we can’t shut the door until we know for sure that “his guys” aren’t “THE guys”.
"Ryan, under center. Single receiver set, to either side. Ryan, gonna throw. First professional pass.....CAUGHT!! Jenkins! 30! 25! 20! 15! 10! 5! He lives in Atlanta!!!" -Wes Durham
So you're saying
that mike smith will start every ex-Jaguar on his team?
by Mattyice318 on Jul 30, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Hope that doesn't happen
I would love to see Lofton, Nicholas and Spoon playing at the same time. Young, fast, aggressive and good hitters.
That picture scares the hell out of me.
He looks like a futuristic samurai time cop getting ready to pull out swords coming to kill me.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Jul 30, 2010 10:20 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Which one though?
Stallone or Snipes?
"Everybody talks about SEC speed. The 27 fastest guys at the (NFL) combine, how many of them were from the SEC? Three. But if you say it enough, everybody will believe it."
-CPJ
"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by 


















