The Great Falcons Roster Breakdown: Linebacker Edition
Ah, linebacker. The traditional bastion of strength on the Falcons' defense, the linebacking corps has seen some true Falcon greats—Tuggle and Brooking come to mind—and quite a few strong players over the years. It's enough to make you nostalgic for those bygone days....and then you remember that in most years, the teams those guys were on weren't very good. So, you know, back to the present.
For the first time in this series of breakdowns, we were unable to secure the reader set to write this. Rather than mope about this, I decided we needed to get this sucker rolling if we were going to finish it before the draft. That's why you're getting two editions of the breakdown on back-to-back days, and that's why today's post is being written by the sage triumvirate of brickcheney, tlozwarlock, and a guy who actually capitalizes his name. For kicks.
Join us after the jump as we see whether our current set of linebackers stacks up with names from Falcons lore.
brickcheney says:
Mike Peterson: C- ↓
On paper, it's hard to find an area at which the 33-year-old Peterson excelled in his first year as a Falcon. His pass rush was famously pointless, as BVG kept winding him up and pointing him at quarterbacks when it was clear MP would prefer to make moves in the box and devour halfbacks. He's no longer quick enough to cover anyone besides average tight ends, and even then his height becomes a disadvantage.
His forté has always been run defense, but even that is slipping. He tallied 30 fewer tackles than Lofton last year, despite being on the field for 30 more snaps. And I distinctly recall Peterson standing flat-footed as a New England running back scored a touchdown up the middle. Anecdotal evidence.
At this point, he's a first- and second-down linebacker, but somehow he played the second-most snaps of any Falcons defender last year. Perhaps Smitty has too much faith in his longtime protégé to sub in more capable pass rushers and coverage linebackers. Who knows.
Of course, there's more to it than what's on paper. When we brought Peterson over from Jacksonville we didn't expect Tecmo Lawrence Taylor. We were getting a player-coach who would help mentor a very young defense while racking up tackles into the sunset. Look at it this way... if Curty Bird becomes everything we think he can be, the investment in Peterson will have been worth it. Speaking of...
Curtis Lofton: B+ ↑
Honestly, what can we say about Lofton that he doesn't already say about himself? Answer: We can say his name is an anagram for Colon Surf Tit. That's a thing we can say about him that he doesn't say about himself. Colt Fun Riots. Sonic Turf Lot, Coil For Stunt, Cool First Nut.
How good can Lofton be? The sky's the limit. We can expect 150+ tackles plus a few sacks, picks, and fumbles from here til... well, let's just say I think we all hope Loco Fist Turn retires as a Falcon in like 2029.
Stephen Nicholas: C+
Stevie Nicks never really jumps out at you. It's easy to go weeks without noticing he's around. Which is both good and bad, of course -- he's no Keith Brooking '08 or Michael Boley '08, but he's also no Keith Brooking '02 or Michael Boley '07.
To this point, Nicholas has been a poor man's Curtis Lofton -- smart, consistent, and tenacious, but without a whole lot of highlight reel material other than being flagged for stepping within Reggie Bush's Free House Personal Safety Zone.
Solid starter? I think that sums it all up.
Coy Wire: C-
Before the signing of Mike Peterson, it seemed like our linebacking squad was good enough -- not good, but good enough. Wire had played pretty well in '08, filling in for the sagging Michael Boley, and seemed like he could hold down the OLB position for a couple seasons.
Compare his (tiny sample size alert) '08/'09 numbers with Peterson's: Wire averaged a tackle every 9.8 snaps, while Peterson came in at 10.7. In '09 Wire produced 3 QB pressures/hits in just 13 blitzes, while Peterson needed almost 10 times the attempts for about 4 times the results. Again, tiny sample size, and it's not Peterson's fault he's asked to blitz so much. Obviously, Peterson contributes more intangibles than Wire can, but I think the numbers suggest Wire is a better value at this point, financially and for the near future.
You hate to trot out a stereotype and describe Wire as being small, fundamental, slowish, intelligent (Stanford!), and determined, but what choice is there? He'll likely remain a special teamer and decent backup, but we'll be happy to keep this Wire "all a part of the game, yo." (...Anybody?)
Spencer Adkins: INC ↑
Statistics show Spencer Adkins played in 5 games last year. I don't recall this.
Robert James: ?
"Slang them keys like Bob James..." I have no idea who Robert James is.
Overall: B-
For the moment, LB is a relative strength for the Falcons. Properly phasing out Peterson will be critical, but the rest of the fleet boasts a future All-Pro, a solid starter, and a versatile backup. Like much of the rest of the roster, it's a start.
tlozwarlock says:
Curtis Lofton, MLB: Lofton is a tacklin’ machine, and there’s no denying it. In his first two years, he’s racked up nearly 200 tackles, over half of them coming from the recently completed 9-7 campaign. He’s not good for much else, having only defended a couple of passes and intercepting none (in his entire career). He’s also only managed zilcho sacks last season, so he’s no the blitzing type of LB. Therefore, he can be seen as both good and bad. He’s great at tackling and is usually our last line of defense in the event our DL cannot contain a rushing or screen play. He’s a pivotal part of our line support and without him, we would never have kept the many great running backs we faced last year in check. So kudos to him at being good at one of the principle caveats of his job. I just wish he were a better pass rusher/pass breaker-upper. Grade: A-
Robert James, MLB: Who? Well we didn’t see much from Robert seeing as Curtis Lofton, aka Super Jumbo Infallible Tacklin Machine of Doom, was never out. With the spate of injuries our team had last year, and the amount of punishment Mr. Lofton takes and gives out, we should be thankful he wasn’t injured and started every game. Someone give Lofton a medal. Oh, where was I? Ah yes, Robert James. Who? Grade: INC
Mike Peterson, OLB: Poised to be a playmaker after two fantastic games against Miami and Carolina to open the season, he absolutely dropped off the face of the planet. He, in the Miami game alone mind you, forced a fumble and intercepted a pass. In the Carolina game, he forced a fumble. He showed back up against Chicago, sending Cutler to the turf on a drop back. The other thirteen games? You almost wouldn’t know he was there on the field. I don’t exactly know what happened between the Carolina and New England games, but whatever it was, it wasn’t good. Grade: C
Spencer Adkins, LB: Sure seemed like he was going to be awesome this year. Instead, he was average, though he did manage to earn a tackle in three of the five games he started. Other than that, outside of some preseason fun, we didn’t see much from him. Grade: C
Coy Wire, OLB: I like Wire. I do. Love his story, how he’s basically fighting every day to stay employed in the NFL during the 08 season and then makes the team in 09 through good performance in camp. What really makes me like him though is the heroics he performs. Against New Orleans, with the game seemingly out of hand, he forces a fumble that’s recovered at the one. The Falcons tie the game with the ensuing score. He was in the right place at the right time, but still, it takes skill to get there. He’s also pretty good at tackling, getting at least one in every game he found playing time. Grade: B+
Stephen Nicholas, OLB: Another rising star I’m expecting some good stuff out of this year, Nicholas sacked Eli Manning, Tony Romo, and (lol) Jake Delhomme. I don’t like any of those guys. Automatic B. He’s also the second most active line supporter, racking up 80 tackles this past season. B+ material now. What’s that? He forced a fumble against the Giants? A student! Grade: A
Overall grade: B+ – The Falcons, though not as pass rushy as perhaps they should be at the LB position, are pretty set here, with Lofton and Nicholas leading the pack. Peterson may or may not be a factor. And then there’s magic man Coy Wire to consider. Yeah, we’re pretty set here. Sorry Weatherspooners, but we really don’t need him. SO THERE!
Dave the Falconer says:
This is a relatively strong set of positions for the Falcons, but there's one weak starter and some issues with depth? Where, you ask? Like you don't already know.
OLB Stephen Nicholas, Starter: Stevie Nickels, as I like to call him because I'm too far away for him to tackle me to the ground and beat the crap out of me, is a quality starting linebacker. He's got excellent speed—not quite Demorrio Williams, but he also is a much more complete player—and he's clearly got the ability necessary to keep his starting spot in the years ahead. Why, then, doesn't his name show up more often in the stat sheet?
I think a lot of that comes back to the way the immortal BVG uses his linebackers. They're not really pass rushers in his system, and they're not called upon to get into the backfield all that often, so you have a speedy guy like Nicholas who is....well, basically waiting around for something to happen. This doesn't seem like the best strategy to me, but I'm a great big stupid blogger and BVG is getting paid big money to run this defense like the Titanic ran into an iceberg. When he was being used to blitz and aggressively pursue the ball carrier, Nicholas was pretty good, amassing 80 tackles, three sacks and a forced fumble.
Because the talent's clearly there and I think BVG will loosen the reins a little bit this season, I expect Nicholas to be a more effective player this season. If he puts up those kind of numbers again in 2010 with an improved Curtis Lofton and a rookie linebacker doing great things on the other side (a man can dream), then he'd still be doing his job quite well. He's a quiet one, that Stevie Nickels, but a mighty fine player.
Grade: B
MLB Curtis Lofton, Starter: Sure, you know Curtis Lofton is a damn good linebacker, but did you know that he eats stars, hearts and rainbows for breakfast....and he's never even heard of Lucky Charms? Did you know he tackles with such force that they're running him in the Large Hadron Collider? And Jesus Christ, did you know he listens to Miley Cyrus?
All of these things should tell you how tough and yet whimsical Lofton is, but none of them tell you about how great a football player he is. Similarly, his tackle totals tell you he's an active player who covers the field, but his lack of big plays might indicate that he's a less than perfect player. THAT'S BLASPHEMY!
Phew. Anyways, Lofton has the ability to be a perennial Pro Bowl linebacker, and he simply needs to be more aggressive and have BVG ask him to do less work in pass coverage, where he's not a liability but not a savior. Against the run, he's a punishing tackler, and with his commitment to becoming the most complete linebacker he can be, I expect great things from Lofton in 2010. Frankly, so should you.
Grade: A-
OLB Mike Peterson, Starter: As a one year stopgap, Peterson was an average-to-below average starter. Imagine what he'd be like as a long-term starter. Or don't.
Look, I like Peterson as a person. He's got so much fire in his belly that Smokey the Bear hefts his axe every time he walks by. He's a great example for everyone else in the locker room. What he offers on the field at this point, however, is basically what you would get if you took a perfectly average linebacker in every regard and hit him so hard on the head that he completely forgot how to play the pass in any meaningful way. He's an incredibly valuable locker room presence, but I really would prefer that he didn't start in 2010.
A lot of that will depend on the draft, of course, and we once more return to the way Peterson was used. I can't help but feel that he'd be infinitely more valuable if BVG didn't insist on dropping him back into coverage, where he's a natural disaster waiting to happen. If the team can find him limited snaps, mainly against the run, then I'm sure he'll do just fine. Ask him to play three downs outside every game and you're gambling, in my opinion.
Grade: C-
LB Spencer Adkins, Backup: Incredibly raw, incredibly athletic and incredibly engimatic. We found out next to nothing about Adkins in his extremely limited playing time, and the coaching staff will continue to bring him along slowly in 2010. Expect him to remain a mystery for one more year, but he could be an incredible asset down the line. I like the word incredible. Incredibly so, actually.
Grade: ?
LB Coy Wire, Backup: Just an incredibly nice guy. As a football player, he's a terrific reserve, a quality veteran presence and a guy who never embarrasses himself when he's called upon. Could the Falcons get younger here? Yeah, probably. But it's a testament to my confidence in Wire's ability that I don't think the team needs to be in any hurry to do so. Look for him to play sparingly but well with a healthy stable of starters in front of him.
Grade: B-
LB Robert James, Backup: I bet you think I'm going to make a lame joke about not knowing who James is, like my colleagues. Well, you'd be wrong, because I know exactly who he is. He's a deceased R&B musician famous for his smash hit Super Freak and his late-life cocaine problems. And he....
What? You say that's Rick James? Oh.
Then I guess this James is a former fifth-rounder who has yet to do anything meaningful on the field, but is young enough to still have potential. Well, that was embarrassing.
Grade: INC
Bottom Line: There's a lot to like here. Curtis Lofton and Stephen Nicholas are both very good starting linebackers, Mike Peterson and Coy Wire would be quality depth on any team and Spencer Adkins and Robert James both have some promise. Of course, the fact that Mike Peterson is starting and neither Adkins or James has shown anything on the field thus far leads me to believe we could update this, and I still think Sean Weatherspoon is a likely pick to fill Peterson's spot. This is still a position of strength for the Falcons, and I'm excited to see what Nicholas and Lofton in particular will do for us in 2010.
Overall Grade: B
0 recs |
52 comments
|
Comments
Dave
Any chance you start a fund raiser to send you down to Falcons training camp for some player interviews where hilarity ensues?
Just a thought.
But anyway. Our Linebackers are very nice and this great in depth review just erks a selection of a one Sean Weatherspoon. When that happens this group looks very silly, good silly.
Australian Atlanta Falcons Fan EST 2003
Man, I wish...
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
I believe brick lives in ATL
But he might say something off the cuff and Smitty might tackle him.
by thisistherevolt on Apr 9, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I live in the ATL send me.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 9, 2010 2:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Favorite breakdown yet.
C Lo is a freak and I expect a break out year also.
Guys after reading this it seems we really need spoon. Pass rush is important but our defense took a dive when we lost Brooking and Boley. If you notice our run D was better because C Lo can stop anything from lightning fast bunny rabbits to Armenian nuclear warheads equipped with super fuel pumped from the center of the Sun. Still one outstanding fact remains we suffer at OLB. Could we use another play maker at DE? We must but right now the most complete player for the Falcons (CAW, CAW!) at #19 is none other than Mr. Spoon. Thus completing what could possibly be the best group of Lbs ever assembled.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 8, 2010 9:02 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Is The Nearest Thing The ATLANTA FALCONS have in the Way of A RUSHING Linebacker Going To Be Sergio Kindle if Available?
We are in need of a Rushing Linebacker Sergio Kindle? If he isn’t Picked by 19th I would be Surprised He was Graded at 8.5. , But 3rd DE of 11 DE graded over 7, and 6 LB over 7 Linbackers Graded over 7 were Rolando McClain 8.6 Brandon Spikes 8.0, Sean Witherspoon 7.9 Navarro Bowman 7.8, Sean Lee 7.7, Daryl Washington 7.2. These all May Qualify with a First Round Pick Although Plenty of 8.0 Graded players at Other Positions. The other DE’s Graded over Kindle are Derrick Morgan 8.6, Jason Paul Pierre 8.6 , Then Kindle Then The Pretty Quick Big Guy Carlos Dunlap 8.4 . Jerry Hughes May a a Great Player, But he is graded at 7.0. Atlanta Shored up their DT ’s Last year with the pick of Perry. and although 10 DT are rated over 7.0 it is not where Atlanta Should spend a First Round Pick When the Problem of LB, and DEcan be Addresses if Atlanta Choses to go with Defense over The OFFENSIVE LINE.
But It Probably Might be a Hard Choice and if They Chose a DT Hopefully he will be Graded over 8.0, But I like DE, LB, OL better Personally.
We so don't need Spoon.
Let’s use that first round pick on something USEful!
You have opinions. We all do. Some of yours may have to do with the Falcons. Sign up today and share them.
Don't need Spoon?
What position are you hoping for?
OMG your right!!
We go kicker at 19!
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 8, 2010 9:42 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You just said about Lofton
“I wish he were a better pass rusher/breaker upper”. Well if that ain’t Spoon then I ain’t a 73 year old white woman with hemeroids and bad case of the runs. Ok, so maybe I’m not that but spoon is absolutely more than said quote.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 8, 2010 10:02 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
But... there is no spoon...
At least, that’s what Morpheus told me.
You have opinions. We all do. Some of yours may have to do with the Falcons. Sign up today and share them.
by Adam Schultz on Apr 8, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Frankly, at this point I would be happy with:
1) Sean Weatherspoon
2) Brandon Graham
3) Jerry Hughes
And I can see an argument for guys like Maurkice Pouncey and maybe Daryl Washington, primarily if we move down. Still a firm believer in defense, and still a firm believer in adding as much talent to the front seven as possible.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
pouncey will be gone at 18th
too bad pittsberg needs offensive line too
Yeah, I'm concerned about how our options may get whittled down
The Steelers could take anyone from the list of guys the Falcons are interested in.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
how often would
the Steelers be picking before us in the draft? we’re on the right track ))
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
Weatherspoon says position coach...
…told him he’d be playing in Mike Peterson’s spot. No big surprise, but I bet Peterson’s going to be considerably less than pleased to hear that.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
So can we just go ahead and call him a Falcon?
You have opinions. We all do. Some of yours may have to do with the Falcons. Sign up today and share them.
by Adam Schultz on Apr 8, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Gregg Williams is our new LB coach?

Longest Atlanta Falcons winning-seasons streak: 2008 - current
The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter
Critical reading fail
I’m leaving this up to remind everyone that yes, even Dave the Falconer makes mistakes.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
"A teachable moment" (c) Barack Obama
Longest Atlanta Falcons winning-seasons streak: 2008 - current
The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter
Arrrrrgggghhh!
Shoulda drafted a LB last year. Clay Matthews anyone? 10 sacks 7 pd’s,plays on the right. And has all kinds of heart! Ah well…Hopefully we don’t stock up on 5’8" corners again this draft
Just because Matthews
had a good year last season does not mean he would have fit into ATL’s defensive scheme. I just don’t think BVG is that bright. If Peterson can’t blitz due to a lost step or two then rush Lofton more.
Hey guys I think we're all invited:

From Chevis Jackson’s Facebook thing.
Longest Atlanta Falcons winning-seasons streak: 2008 - current
The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter
Frolic nuts to....
Hahahaha!
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 8, 2010 9:25 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
props for "the Wire" reference
I am that “anybody?”
WINNER
Longest Atlanta Falcons winning-seasons streak: 2008 - current
The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter
can we get Slim Charles to replace Michael Jenkins?
Or maybe Omar to shore up our D Line?
by TheAreopagite on Apr 8, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions
but back to football, what about barbie doll linebackers?
I’m not sure why BVG and Smitty prefer these undersized OLB (Atkins, James, Nichols). They’re speedy, but many of them play in the 220 to 230 range, which is more of SS or Rover size. Coy Wire even played as a safety in college. This should make our OLBs better in pass coverage, but we all saw how that worked out. It also means that when rushed they don’t have the strength and size to fend of TE or HB blocks. So should we finally draft some bigger OLBs? This is why I think its time to champion Hughes over Spoon, who is basically a mouthier Michael Boley. Talk amongst yourselves.
I love Hughes, but BECAUSE he's a lot like Nicholas
Not that he doesn’t have a little more size, but if he’s moving to linebacker he’s similarly quick and deadly at the point of attack. Hughes is easy to say yes to.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
Well then
I say we build our own treehouse and throw waterballoons at the Spoonmen’s treehouse.
by TheAreopagite on Apr 8, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions
We don't have a treehouse
WE HAVE A FORT.
by thisistherevolt on Apr 9, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Isn't Spenser Atkins over 250lbs??
"If lessons were learned in defeat, our team is getting a great education." -Murray Warmath
Amazingly
He is now listed at 246, so I stand corrected. When he came out of Miami he was around 230, which is probably why he ran somewhere in the high 4.3s if memory serves. So I guess they’ve beefed him up somewhat. He’s still a workout warrior, so I don’t see him being much more than a fast special teams player, and I still think our ’backers are a tad small. Then again, now that I think about it, ALL of our defense players are undersized. Coincidence?
by TheAreopagite on Apr 9, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Other Favorite LB's possibly, that could Help Atlanta, are Brandon Spikes, Rennie Curran ...
Brandon Spikes is a 8.0 Grade Other Good Linebackers for later in Draft may be Rennie Curran Graded 5.0 at 83, 98, 117 or 149. Sean Witherspoon , He would not be Available at 98 or 83 For that Matter , But I wouldn’t Trade up, you need all 8 Picks. Pat Angerer Graded 6.3. Rodderick McElroy 5.8 Joe Pawelek may be Good at LB as well 171 or 189 Possibly. But at These Picks 83 and 98 Javier Arenas 6.9, Tim Tebow 6.1(I still think he’ll go Higher), Toby Gerhart 6.0 (If not picked in First or Second) Mike Johnson G 6.2, Jordan Shipley 6.7, Matt Tennant C 2.3 , John Jerry, 6.0 Joique Bell ( Stats are Unbelievable!) 3.6, A.J. Edds 3.7, Dennis Pitna( Best TE in College by Stats) 6.7, Ryan Stamper,, Major Wright 4.6, Clifton Geathers3.4, Sam Young 4.7, Ciron Black 4.0, Eric Olsen C 3.0, Mitch Petrus2.9 , Jon Asamoah 7.1, Selfish Capers6.9 , Vlad Ducase 7.4 , Anthony Dixon 5.4 ,Kyle Callaway 5.4 ,Prince Miller 5.3, Adam Ulotski, Geno Atkins 5.7, Jeff Owens 2.3, Morgan Burnett 2.8 , Tyson Alaulu 7.5, Golden Tate 7.5
That's a lot of names and numbers
Anyone else notice all the awesome names of players coming out this year? Selvish Capers. Ciron Black. Vladimir Ducasse. So good they could be Bond character names.
by TheAreopagite on Apr 8, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Angerer is my favorite. Great name for a hard hitting LB
Kinda like Thunder Collins at Nebraska before he went crazy
Almost 6 years now they saying Spencer Adkins is raw with unlimited talent——from the days he was one of the Top LB High School recruits. Problem with Adkins is his lack of LB Instincts——doomed to the Special Teams squad.
James can be a beast problem is it’s on a miniature scale, he’ll easily be replaced by solid draft picks.
Peterson will be retired or a backup within one year.
The other three are keepers—-for now…..
one thing I always wondered about the draft...
and this could be a totally insane question, but do you think GMs have a pretty good idea of who other teams will take around their slot? i wonder if there isn’t a common courtesy they do each other in the fraternity of GMs where they are willing to share information on who they will or won’t be taking, assuming it doesn’t do them damage to share that info. or is it just a complete and utter mystery to each of them?
i just wonder if Dimitroff ever calls the GMs of teams ahead of him and says “hey, can you let me know if you are going to take player X so i don’t continue to waste my time looking at him?”
probably not, just didn’t know how all that worked.
by cheshire falcon on Apr 9, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Most likely not
that could give teams added incentive to trade up/down in the draft if they know you are looking at a guy they want they will jump ahead of you and take him
the problem with that is how difficult it is to trade up these days.
trading into the first is difficult. things like that have happened before, but there might be some kind of unwritten rule that says something like this.
Team A needs an LB. Team B also needs an LB.
Team A has an earlier draft pick than Team B.
Both LB 1 and LB 2 have been worked out by both teams.
Team A really desires LB 1.
Team B really desires LB 2.
LB 1 gets taken before Team A’s pick.
Team A passes on LB 2 because they know that Team B really wants LB 2, and settles for LB 1.5.
Kind of like a gentlemen’s rule thing. I’m sure something like that HAS to be out there, somewhere.
"Ryan, under center. Single receiver set, to either side. Ryan, gonna throw. First professional pass.....CAUGHT!! Jenkins! 30! 25! 20! 15! 10! 5! He lives in Atlanta!!!" -Wes Durham
I bet it's a pretty ruthless seen.
Rule #1: Double tap.
by Ball Hawk on Apr 9, 2010 7:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
No help...this is bloodsport!
I actually wonder if our working out Spoon (he just visited AGAIN) is a smokescreen to try and entice some of the later teams to trade up into our spot. The Cards, Saints, and probably others might decide that they can’t live without him, and are willing to give up significant value for him. I don’t think the FO is that smitten.
by TheAreopagite on Apr 9, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 


















