THE playbook
hows it going falcons fans. have a great topic of discusion for today. I noticed last season watching nfl.com play by play for everygame that we are not utilixing our talent. we seemed very predictable. norwood didnt get enough short passes. seems like roddy was looked to as last resort. the only thing that went well was the tony g train. ive heard that mr mularky said that this playbook is the thinest hes ever had. is this because mr smith is more of a defensive coach?because matt was a sophmore so it was simplified. why? or is it that mularky seemed very conservative. i noticed this before the injurys so it wasnt like people where getting double covered or anything. we have a potent offense and i feel like either the playbook is too thin, or mularky is too predictable and conservative
so what do ya think? do we need a new o coordinater? new playbook? should it get better since matt is older. do we need both or am i just a white guy in a spike lee movie. (not making any sence) comment me fellas
This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.
2 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i think ...
that the more plays we have better the chance we have of making mistakes we should keep it simple and play hard and the play book doesn’t tell matt who to throw the ball to its just roddy is getting double covered every play and you can triple cover tony and he is still a mismatch and mike jenkins just doesnt seem like he is ever gonna be a threat of his own he just doesnt stand out on the field to matt
I think we've all lamented the playcalling at some point.
And yes, I would like to see more plays. However I don’t think we need a new offensive coordinator. The LAST thing we need is to start rebuilding again. Give all the players and the coaches a few more years in the current system, and I doubt we’ll have these worries still.

by 


















