Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Positional Analysis – Linebackers

The first post in this series was on Defensive Backs.  Now it’s time to move to the Linebackers.  Again, these advanced stats are from the Football Outsiders Almanac 2009, from their Game Charting Project.  With the major changes made to the linebacker group this year, it will be very hard to get any useful information from these numbers, but I will at least make the effort… 

Star-divide

Here’s a recap of some of the Football Outsider stats:

Plays: Total number of Plays including Tackles, Passes Defensed, Interceptions, Forced Fumbles, and Fumble Recoveries (Special Teams tackles are not included).

Stop: Total number of Plays that prevent "success" by the Offense (success is defined by 45% of yards needed on first down, 60% of yards needed on second down, and 100% of yards needed on third and fourth down).

Defeat: Prevent Offense from converting a first down on third or fourth down, a Tackle behind the Line of Scrimmage, or a Play that results in a Fumble or an Interception.

Run Yards (RunYd): Average Yards gained on Runs this defender makes the Tackle.

Stop Rate: Percentage of Run Tackles that were a Stop.

Targets: Number of plays this defender was listed in coverage.

Success Rate: Percentage of Pass Plays that the Offense did not have a successful play.  This includes Interceptions, Incompletes, and short gains that do not meet the baseline for "success".

Adjusted Pass Yards (AdjYd): Average Yards gained on plays with this defender listed in coverage, with a slight adjustment for quality of the Wide Receiver.

Rank: These are the ranks for the various stats.  There were 89 Linebackers that made enough Plays to be ranked.

DVOA: The majority of the ratings featured on FootballOutsiders.com are based on DVOA, or Defense-adjusted Value Over Average. DVOA breaks down every single play of the NFL season to see how much success offensive players achieved in each specific situation compared to the league average in that situation, adjusted for the strength of the opponent.

 

For more info on Football Outsider stats, check here.

 

Outside Linebackers

 

One thing we can all agree on – and these numbers generally support – is the idea of addition by subtraction.   Keith Brooking is an all-time Falcons great, but he was a below average linebacker (to put it kindly) last year.  He was near the very bottom of the league in Stop Rate, Success Rate, and AdjYd; he was slightly better in RunYds, but still in the bottom half of the league.

 Slideshow_1095492_7_medium

via alt.coxnewsweb.com

 

  

His replacement at the weakside is Mike Peterson.  While he has looked very good in limited action in the first two preseason games, his numbers don’t look too much better than Brooking’s.  His Run Defense numbers are slightly better, but that could be something as simple as him playing MLB instead of OLB.  His numbers in coverage were almost as bad as Brooking’s (they had the exact same Success Rates, but Brooking was giving up 1.3 more AdjYd).  Peterson’s numbers in 2007 were even worse than last year, although he did miss 6 games with a broken hand.

 

Another addition to the linebacker group is Jamie Winborn.  He is strictly here for depth, as he has only started 32 of his 92 career games, but his numbers are fairly encouraging.  He is not a pass rusher (0.5 Sacks in each of the last two years), and he shouldn’t be used in coverage (7.2 and 7.1 AdjYd in ’08 and ’07, respectively).  But he looks to be a good Run Stopper (with good Stop Rates and decent RunYds the last two years), especially when you consider the awful Defensive Line the Broncos fielded in front of him.

 

Michael Boley is another guy the team decided to let sign elsewhere after last year.  In past years, he always looked great in these advanced stats, but he was a liability versus the run last year (even though the move originally surprised me, the coaches were absolutely right that he needed to be replaced on Run downs).  He was in the bottom 7 of all ranked linebackers in both Stop Rate and RunYds.  He was, however, still very good in pass coverage – ranking in the top third of the league in Success Rate and AdjYds.

 

 49f4c1ea20ca4706947975c7209c1db0_ashx_medium

via www.atlantafalcons.com

 

The favorite to replace Boley at strongside is Stephen Nicholas.  The problem here is that he hasn’t been on the field enough to post many statistics (hopefully everybody read the story of why he wasn’t on the field much last year).  There are no advanced stats from last year to confirm it, but I seem to remember him performing fine in coverage when he was on the field in the Nickle package.  Plus, his 1.0 Sacks last year was 1 more than Brooking and Boley combined.

 

Coy Wire started in place of Boley at the end of last season, but he was involved in only 21 "Plays", so he’s not ranked.  But the raw numbers look decent: his 3.1 RunYds were the best of the team’s linebackers last year, and his numbers in coverage were at worst average51% Success Rate and 4.7 AdjYd.

 

 

Middle Linebacker

 83099_feature_medium

via cdn.bleacherreport.com

 

Now we get to the star of the show, Curtis Lofton.  He was simply fantastic as a rookie.  He had a 70% Stop Rate (#25), and was credited with 69 Run "Plays" (17 more than Brooking, while only playing two downs).  His 3.9 RunYds was a little high, but with Peria Jerry, Trey Lewis, and other changes along the D-Line, plus that extra year of experience, hopefully his average tackle will be about a yard closer to the line of scrimmage this year.  He was only credited with 15 Targets, but his numbers in coverage looked great in that limited time – 67% Success Rate (10% better than Boley) and 4.0 AdjYd (1.4 yards better than Boley).  He also had 13 Defeats in part-time duty (Brooking and Boley each had 14).  I am certainly expecting big things from Lofton this year.

 

 

Final Thoughts

 

Here are two big problems for this year:

 

1)     The Linebackers only had 2.0 Sacks last season, good for #29 in the NFL as a percentage of total Sacks (and D-Backs had zero), even though VanGorder sent 6+ Rushers 8.6% of the time (#14 in the league) and 7+ Rushers 3.0% of the time (#5 in the league).  Either VanGorder is going to have to trust the Front Four to put pressure on the QB, or these new Linebackers (and D-Backs) that blitz are going to have to actually get to the QB so the team isn’t exposed to the big play.

2)     The Linebackers will probably still be below average in Pass Coverage.  Not awful like last year, mind you, but below average (the team was 28th in DVOA vs. Tight Ends and 29th vs. Running Backs).  Lofton should be fine, and Peterson will be better than Brooking, but still not great.  That leaves Nicholas – I don’t know what to expect from him, but he will almost certainly be worse than Boley in his first year starting.

 

I think this unit is much improved from last year, but I still worry it will possibly be the weakest unit on Defense this season.

 

This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.

Comment 12 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bravo!

I get the warm and fuzzies seeing Curtis Lofton appreciated even by advance metrics. The dude’s a stud in the making, no doubt.

One thing about those numbers that interests me is that Winborn, I thought, was actually a relatively above average coverage linebacker. Perhaps I was wrong.

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Aug 24, 2009 6:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Well,

I probably shouldn’t use definitive decriptions like “shouldn’t be used”… These numbers still rely on the system (what the player is required to do) and skill of other players involved. Denver’s pass defense last year was so bad, the whole system could’ve been broken… the coverage numbers really stood out, though – especially since his run numbers looked so good (his Stop Rate was the same as Lofton’s: 70%). He may still have the skill to cover well in a better system… that’s for the scouts and coaches to decide.

by orang3b on Aug 25, 2009 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I had no idea we blitzed that much last season...

especially not comparatively to the league averages.

As always, a well written article and full of insight. It really seems that our LBs are kinda in the unproven stages which is making them difficult to predict. Peterson obviously has more desire to play here in Atlanta and hopefully that will be enough to improve his game (it has appeared to do so in the preseason) and I have no idea what to expect out of Nicholas. Lofton should continue to improve, he’ll definitely be dependable and these numbers seem to prove it.

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Aug 24, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks

Yeah, I think I’ve got a pretty good feel for what to expect from Lofton and Peterson, but Nicholas could be anywhere from awful (like bottom 25% of the league) to good (maybe top third of the league), and it wouldn’t surprise me. Obviously, Peterson could have a big bounce-back year, or Lofton could take a huge step forward in his second season, but really (IMO) whether this unit is a strength or just adequate is hinging on Nicholas.

About the blitzes: I’ve been researching that some, and I went back and re-watched a little of last year’s action. That 7+ Rushers number scares the crap outta me. Stuff like “Anquan Boldin for 71 yard TD” happens too often on 7 Man Blitzes. Also, I’m hoping they were just making an emphasis on working on this in the STL (preseason) game, but (I think) 3 times in the first half VanGorder sent the same zone blitz: a rushing LB and DB from the offensive Right, and dropping the opposite DE into a short zone to the Left (at least once, it was Abe). Dropping Abe into coverage once every 3-4 games to surprise a team might work, but if VanGorder’s planning on doing it 2-3 times per game I’m going to be very, very angry…

by orang3b on Aug 25, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

nice

that’s cool but still might need someone to take Keith Brookings place in the draft maybe Brandon Spikes, the dude is a monster and is the top MLB in the NCAA

by southman on Aug 29, 2009 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

The problem is that we don't need an MLB

If he can move outside, I’d be on board, but there’s no way I’m moving Lofton…

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave Choate on Aug 29, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm all for drafting a LB in this next draft

but I agree with Dave.

It won’t be MLB. We need to start conditioning Peterson’s replacement. Speaking of future replacements, a high round TE wouldn’t upset me too much either.

I’m also sold on making our first pick a Center… but another football season of watching our defense is probably going to change what I feel we need to focus on in the draft.

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Aug 29, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

We could probably get Dakota Watson in next years draft in the 2-3rd rounds....

He’s a prototype WLB in a 4-3, and fast as the wind blows. Reports say he’s runs a 4.39 40, but I’ll wait till he’s laser timed before I swear by that.. That’s really fast for a kid who is almost 230 lbs….

I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.

Elayne Boosler

by NaGaNole on Aug 29, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

he can

yeah he can don’t forget that he’s also a DE so they could draft him and move him to a OLB position

by southman on Aug 29, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

at any point do the FO guys analize preseason performances?

because from what I saw, Lofton put up quite the showing against San Diego (contrary to the rest of the defense) and I was curious to how they would have broken down his play.

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Aug 30, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think so

At least not as far as tracking coverages, stop rate, etc. They might just make some random comments about certain guys looking good, but not really break all the games down…

by orang3b on Aug 30, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

HEY!!!

Considering all the changes we have been through can we get a re-eval of the secondary, or even the O-line or offense in general?

by ca$hmere36 on Sep 9, 2009 4:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Falcoholic Primer

Where Falcons fans come to roost.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Can TO Help Bring a Superbowl Ring to Atlanta?
Forever-alone-dollar-bill_small
Icing the IceMan.
Primetime_small
Mock Draft 3.0
Forever-alone-dollar-bill_small
Heyyyy why Not?
Small
Let The Mock Drafts Continue
Mass-effect-3-hd-wallpaper-3_small
Mock Off-Season Part 2
Rams_logo_small
What's everyones thoughts on Les Snead?
Poor_voodoodoll_by_jorshma_small
Taking a shot at a mock draft
Forever-alone-dollar-bill_small
Serious Push
40564a_small
Late Round Picks for Atlanta: William Vlachos

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Baron Of All He Blogs

Thefalcoholic_small Dave Choate

Marquis of Musings

Newprofile_small Adam Schultz

Earls of Typing

181614_735189801813_23210129_40578364_6784501_n_small Jason Kirk

Bear-woodsjpg-ee4252752e478b73_large_small James Rael

205892_10150259660296336_683626335_7946790_3837839_n_small Caleb Rutherford

Img_0301_small Jeanna Thomas