DVOA Matchup - Philadelphia Eagles
I didn't do the Matchup post last week while I was out of town, but I'm back on track now. I'm glad Tloz gave us a good ol' shot of optimism, but DVOA paints a different picture. To put it bluntly, it's going to take a minor miracle to beat the Eagles, if we believe these numbers. (Reminder, DVOA explanation here).
When the Falcons have the ball:
| TEAM | PASS | RUSH | VARIANCE | RANK | ||||
| DVOA | RANK | PASSING | RANK | RUSHING | RANK | |||
| ATL Offense | 9.80% | 17 | 18.70% | 16 | 5.60% | 11 | 3.90% | 3 |
| PHI Defense | -11.00% | 3 | -15.00% | 4 | -5.70% | 16 | 8.40% | 26 |
Our Running Game against their Run Defense looks to be about even. We are clearly at a disadvantage in the Passing Game, though. The Eagles are #2 in Pass Defense against #1 WRs (allowing only 43 yards per game to top wideouts), and #6 agains "other" WRs. We're going to have to hope for a big game from Michael Jenkins, since they're only #18 against #2 WRs. They are #11 in Defensive DVOA (on a per-play basis) against TEs, but are allowing 70 yards per game (league average is 50 yards), since teams are trying to attack them this way (over 9 passes per game to opposing TEs).
Again the Variance looks to be in our favor. They are generally a good Defense, but occasionally have very poor games. We've consistently been in the middle of the pack Offensively, but injuries may make even that fairly low standard of output difficult to reach.
Like the Matchup with the Giants, the two Offensive Lines have fairly similar numbers, but our opponents have the vastly superior Defensive Line. They are #6 in Adjusted Line Yards (Run Defense) and #7 in Adjusted Sack Rate (we are obviously well south of these numbers).
Their best player on Defense is Trent Cole, and he is an absolute stud as a pass rusher and against the run. The weakest link on their "D", according to PFF, is Safety Sean Jones. Hopefully Mularkey can find a way to get him or LB Chris Gocong consistently matched up with Tony G.
When the Eagles have the ball:
| TEAM | PASS | RUSH | VAR. | RANK | ||||
| DVOA | RANK | PASSING | RANK | RUSHING | RANK | |||
| ATL Defense | 11.10% | 25 | 28.90% | 29 | -9.30% | 12 | 6.00% | 18 |
| PHI Offense | 14.00% | 12 | 24.50% | 15 | 13.40% | 6 | 9.50% | 28 |
That Rush Offense looks a little wonky to me, but remeber that it is an efficiency number. Andy Reid likes to maintain that 25-75 Run/Pass Ratio (I'm only exaggerating a little), so teams have to gameplan for the Passing Game. Again, Philly is near the bottom of the league in Variance. They may come out gangbusters, or they may come out totally flat.
Our Pass Defense is sandwiched between STL and CLE - not good company, to say the least. We are now below average in every aspect of Pass Defense: Defending WRs, TEs, RBs, and Sack Rate. Against WRs is especially bad: #32 against #1 WRs, #27 against #2 WRs, and #28 against "other" WRs. You would think having DeSean Jackson out would provide hope, but DVOA says both Jeremy Maclin (8.8% DVOA, 12.9 YPC) and Jason Avant (31.3% DVOA, 76% Catch Rate) have been better (on a per-play basis, at least). I don't expect either of them to have any trouble. TE Brent Celek should have plenty of room to operate, as well.
Special Teams:
Hopefully with the recent changes, we won't have the worst FG/XP team from this point forward. We are still first in Kickoffs/KO Coverage, though. David Akers makes Philly well above average in FG/XP and Kickoffs/KO Coverage. The Eagles are the #3 team in Punt Returns (and the Falcons are well below average in Punts/Punt Coverage), but without DeSean Jackson, they may not be as dangerous. Then again, if Maclin fills in there too, they may not miss a beat.
Overall:
| TEAM | TOTAL | |
| DVOA | RANK | |
| ATL | -1.30% | 18 |
| PHI | 30.60% | 4 |
Even though the records are similar, the numbers show that the Eagles are a much stronger team overall. Football Outsiders puts about even with teams like Indianapolis and Minnesota, while the Falcons are just ahead of teams like San Fransisco and Jacksonville. Taking into account all the injuries to the stars on offense, our biggest advantages look to simply be Homefield Advantage, and the Eagles crazy Variance numbers. This is one of the most important games of the year, and looks like one of the toughest. Thank goodness they play the games on the field, not on paper (or inside computers).
This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.
8 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hard to see any statistical advantage for the Falcons
This is why there’s not much overt optimism from Falcons fans toward this game IMO. By almost any objective metric, it doesn’t look encouraging.
That’s the great thing about football, though. The men on the field don’t give a rat’s @ss what any numbers say. We’ll all be cheering for them on Sunday. Good luck, Falcons!
Glad I'm not the only one who's seeing the negative side of things.
Our numbers may not pan out, but they’re just numbers. The men in the trenches don’t care about those. They just wanna win and that’s all that counts on game day.
You have opinions. We all do. Some of yours may have to do with the Falcons. Sign up today and share them.
It will be a good game or it won't
Covering all my bases here.Just a small observation from a real dumbo.When a team is so inconsistent do the numbers still apply?Hey I’m not knocking the Falcons its just sometimes they are great and sometimes not.Hell sometimes they are that way on a single drive(great/not so great).Here is how I see it .You know when you are going on vacation ,the week before you are all excited, can’t wait, fired up, it’s the expectation if you will that sets the tone for the whole thing.This year for some reason my expectations were high.We have seen some really good play.However we have seen mostly bad playing,dumb mistakes , injuries etc.so all in all the falcons are making that slow march to greatness.Things actually went wonky last year when we had such unexpected sucess.This year is more like it.A slow drive to greatness.Be patient for two more years.We will survive, we will prevail, we will be champions,just not this year.
Good analysis. Philly still misses Dawkins and Jimmy Johnson and will be without Westbrook and Jackson. Redman actually had a better game than McNabb last week. Should be a good game.
I had a dream that Andy Reid could not figure out how to stop Tony G during preparation for this game. So he called Goodall and begged to forfeit so he would not be embarrassed going in as a favorite and taking an unavoidable loss. Goodall said no. So instead Reid ordered the team to start Vick to save Donavan from injury, and then called in sick for Sunday’s game.
Redman was throwing against TB
Mcnabb was playing against a top ten defense. Also he was better than stats say. Celek dropped alot of balls because of his bad hand and Mcnabb’s only int came when his arm was hit.
Redman was playing w/out 2 starting OLmen ...
It’s all relative homie.
Reporter: How will you address all of the dropped passes?
Mike Smith: I don’t think that we were as sharp as we have been catching the football. It’s something that is very fixable. It’s VERY fixable.
Crap
The numbers show our #2 WR to be a possible factor… but Jenkins is inactive. I’d be surprised if the offense doesn’t REALLY struggle.
If Weems was ever going to have a game to go nuts as a returner, this would be a nice one…
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by 

















