A Look At The Falcons Red Zone Performance: Week 14
This post is sponsored by Comcast and their NFL RedZone channel. If you're looking to check out red zone action as it happens, then you need Comcast's NFL RedZone. Because Comcast loves you, even if your family doesn't.
So...about the Saints.
As you might've guessed by now, the Falcons generally capitalized on their red zone chances against the mighty Nawlins Aints, like they always do. The team only got inside the 20 a grand total of three times, and they twice settled for field goals and got a touchdown after Jason Snelling was able to punch it in. You'd prefer we weren't booting field goals at that point, but it could've been worse.
As usual, the Falcons' issues run much deeper than that. It's about scoring from anywhere on the field or at least getting within striking distance more than three times, and that's something the team just can't seem to figure out how to do. It's frustrating, but ultimately not something we can really change this year.
I'll pose this question to all of you: Do you think having Harry Douglas available next season will help to open things up, whether it be from the 50 or the 20? I have to think having that third quality option (Jenkins only counts 1/3rd of the time) would be a big boost.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Scoring from anywhere on the field
I’m not sure if HD will really help much unless there is a shift in the overall passing game. For the life of me, I don’t understand why Roddy is the “possession receiver” and Jenkins is the “deep threat” this season (in general, of course). Also, all the short pass routes seem to be choking the life out of the passing game. That was what was so great about the few times they took a deep shot against the Saints (the Jenkins TD, plus the one off his fingertips). Although, they don’t have to be just dink-and-dunk or “bombs” – there are these little things called intermediate routes…
Back to the short routes, with an example from the Saints game (and forgive me if I’m slightly off – I’m piecing this together from memory, the play-by-play, and Pro Football Focus): 1:22 left in 1Q, 3rd&2 @ NO12. Shotgun, with split backs (Snelling and Weems in backfield). Jenkins to the Left, Roddy to the Right, Tony G lined up slot Right. At the snap, Jenkins, Tony G, and Roddy all ran quick hitch routes right at the first down line. They literally each took 2-3 steps then turned around. One of the backs (Weems?) leaked out into the flats, and I’m pretty sure the other back stayed in to block. That makes 4 eligible receivers about 2 yards away from the Line of Scrimmage. The problem (well, the main problem) was that the Saints were in man-to-man coverage, and since nobody could get any separation, Redman had to tuck and run. He got zero yards, so Sedrick Ellis was given credit for a sack (this is the play they were facemasking each other on the tackle). FG, and a missed opportunity for 7.
Several things here. 1) It’s not like Mularkey doesn’t know Gregg Williams likes to run man coverage a ton, especially if he’s bringing heat. 2) We’re on the 12 yard line – can’t we send somebody into the endzone, if nothing else than to open up some space? Again, I’ll go back to a quote from the “What’s wrong with Cutler?” post:
The defense was “…waiting for the short pass, and knowing that theBearsFalcons had admitted defeat in a strategic sense.”
Mularkey either doesn’t have confidence in the Pass Protection to allow time for deeper routes, or he has no confidence in either QB to complete the deep passes, or simply prefers the “horizontal” passing game (my vote goes here). Whatever the reason, the scheme is forcing the offense to execute for 10+ plays to get close to scoring range. It is the world’s best “bend but don’t break” Offense. What should we call it? “Smoke but no Fire”? “Jabs but no Haymakers”? “The Big Tease”? Maybe just “Dud Fireworks”…
Sorry for the rant.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
by orang3b on Dec 18, 2009 12:43 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
It's only common sense to throw long(er) occasionally
If not, you’re telling the opponent’s D that they don’t have to consider the long ball as a weapon, for defensive play calling purposes. That’s a considerable advantage for the other team! There’s a lot of ways a coach can become predictable, perhaps some other teams have figured out Mularkey’s weakness in that respect.
agree with you
in many cases I also had a feeling that Mularkey became predictable in his playcalling
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
HD could provide that needed spark
but don’t consider him a savior. We will have much better game from the whole offense once our offensive life is healthy. in the beginning of the season we have success also because the line protected Ryan well. I am hoping that this offseason other than fixing those pressing defensive problems, team management will find some resources to build some depth in the offensive line.
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
no salary cap
if they dotn work something out. it could be a lot better or a lot worse, depending on how much money arthur has left.
Life is a garden. Dig it!
by Hardcore Falcon on Dec 18, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
I'm concerned HD has become a panacea.
It would be really, really great if we had another reletively big, quick wide out for our passing game, but I can’t recall Harry Douglas being the fire under the offense. He only played 20 or 25% of the snaps (that’s from memory…I’ll swallow the words if I have to).
It looks more to me like the offensive system is way predictable. The “clean-out” routes aren’t cleaning anyone out of a zone and the passing game has gone horizontal at 1-yard-shy of the sticks.
Mularkey MUST scheme differently every week so the routes and protections take defenders by surprise.
How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!
You may have to swallow those words
If PFF is right, he played 517 of 1152 Offensive Snaps (44.9%). That may be goofed up, though, because P-F-R only shows 1011 Offensive Plays. Crap, now that I think about it, I think PFF grades plays with Penalties (which are NO PLAY in the play-by-play). I was still very surprised at how high that total was for a guy who only had 23 Receptions.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
23 catches is fewer than 1.5 a game.
Far greater impact as a punt returner than as a part of the offense. I like him, but he’s just a good receiver based on on the Malarkey system.
How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!
I think it's what he offers as compared to Jenkins
That I’m intrigued by. Jenkins, we know, is a slightly above average receiver and good blocker. Douglas could be more than that.
Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!
by Dave Choate on Dec 20, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
as long as that surprise
is not a wildcat on 1 and 10 with 4 mins to go…
Atlanta Falcons fan in Moscow, Russia
by Gemini-RU on Dec 19, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by 










