The Falcoholic: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Professor Frink’s Power Rankings, Week 12


33cvqlk_medium

via i37.tinypic.com

Submitted for your approval, here is this week's venture into the Twilight Zone of floating, spinning football numbers.  Enjoy!

Star-divide

RATINGS COMPUTATION (must-read for newbies):

          At its heart, this is a VERY simple method of calculating ratings, using only two stats.  The results aren't meant to be a perfect reflection of the real world; don't focus too narrowly on exactly where each team's totals are ranked.  The two components (O and D ratings) are often more revealing than the totals, don't overlook those.

          Here's how the ratings are calculated.  The first step is to calculate two simple stats:  Points For per Game, and Points Against per Game, for each team.  These two leaguewide data sets for offense & defense both conform to a "Bell Curve", or Normal Distribution, that can be graphed.  Depending on where each team lies on that graph, they have a value between 0 and 1.  (This isn't something pulled from thin air.  It's a very common, standardized statistical analysis technique.  The purpose is to more accurately measure each team's position within the ‘population' of all league teams.)  You now have every team rated from 0 to 1, on offense and on defense.  Add those two numbers and you've got a total rating for each team.  Last, multiply by 50 to convert the ratings onto a 0-to-100 scale, making them more readable and intuitive.  There you go.  Simple, right?

Rank

Power Rating

Team

W-L-T

PF/G

PA/G

 

Offense Rating

Defense Rating

Total

1

88.1

Colts

11-0-0

27.6

16.7

0.857

0.904

1.761

2

87.6

Vikings

10-1-0

31.1

18.5

0.953

0.799

1.751

3

83.7

Patriots

7-4-0

27.9

18.4

0.868

0.806

1.673

4

82.5

Saints

11-0-0

37.0

20.1

0.997

0.653

1.649

5

77.7

Chargers

8-3-0

28.4

19.9

0.884

0.671

1.555

6

76.6

Packers

7-4-0

26.9

19.5

0.826

0.706

1.532

7

76.3

Cowboys

8-3-0

23.2

16.5

0.613

0.912

1.526

8

75.6

Ravens

6-5-0

23.4

17.1

0.625

0.886

1.512

9

70.1

Bengals

8-3-0

21.0

15.8

0.463

0.940

1.402

10

70.0

Eagles

7-4-0

26.6

20.7

0.814

0.587

1.401

11

68.6

Cardinals

7-4-0

24.3

19.7

0.684

0.688

1.372

12

68.1

Steelers

6-5-0

22.5

18.5

0.570

0.792

1.362

13

65.3

Jets

5-6-0

20.9

17.7

0.456

0.850

1.306

14

58.3

49ers

5-6-0

20.7

19.4

0.444

0.722

1.166

15

57.0

Broncos

7-4-0

17.8

17.2

0.258

0.881

1.139

16

56.6

Falcons

6-5-0

24.7

22.3

0.712

0.421

1.133

17

53.9

Texans

5-6-0

23.5

22.1

0.637

0.440

1.078

18

49.4

Giants

6-5-0

24.7

23.7

0.712

0.276

0.988

19

46.4

Redskins

3-8-0

15.5

18.6

0.144

0.785

0.928

20

39.6

Dolphins

5-6-0

23.3

25.0

0.619

0.174

0.793

21

39.3

Seahawks

4-7-0

20.3

22.7

0.412

0.373

0.786

22

32.9

Bills

4-7-0

16.9

22.0

0.209

0.450

0.659

23

32.3

Bears

4-7-0

19.6

23.7

0.370

0.276

0.646

24

30.8

Jaguars

6-5-0

18.4

23.2

0.289

0.328

0.617

25

29.6

Panthers

4-7-0

18.1

23.3

0.273

0.319

0.592

26

27.5

Titans

5-6-0

20.8

26.3

0.450

0.099

0.549

27

16.4

Chiefs

3-8-0

16.6

25.6

0.196

0.133

0.328

28

16.4

Raiders

3-8-0

10.5

23.5

0.026

0.301

0.328

29

12.5

Lions

2-9-0

17.5

30.5

0.242

0.008

0.250

30

10.8

Buccaneers

1-10-0

16.5

28.5

0.187

0.029

0.215

31

9.2

Browns

1-10-0

11.1

25.4

0.034

0.149

0.183

32

5.7

Rams

1-10-0

11.8

27.0

0.045

0.069

0.114

 

 

means:

21.5

21.5

 

          The Saints' impressive victory over the Pats just missed elevating them to 3rd place here, one more TD would have done it.  Falcons were unchanged, ranking-wise.

          The only team rising or falling more than 3 places was the 49ers, up from 18th to 14th.  Packers, Bengals, Bills were up 3; Ravens, Texans, Giants down 3.

          There's your week 12 numbers, spreadsheet download is hereSkaal!

This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.

3 recs  |  Comment 38 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Approved!

And please, please, please, make sure the Eagles slip in the rankings next week.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 1, 2009 2:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

My numbers live to please others

I hope the Falcons can knock the Eagles down a few notches, myself.

by tom slick on Dec 1, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey O.C.C

I found another stats-based Power Ranking you may be interested in. It’s from the guys at Pro-Football-Reference, and it’s based on efficiency stats only (net yards per pass attempt gained/allowed, and yards per carry gained/allowed). I figured you’d like it, since it has the Cowboys #2 behind only the Saints. I tried to signed up at BTB, but it told me I had a 24 hour waiting period – hope you check back here.

For those interested, but too lazy to click the link: the Falcons are way down at #25.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Dec 3, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Orang3B

thanks for the pointer, I’ll look it up.

I have become a friendly troll here ever since our game a couple of weeks back, and also enjoy you line breakdowns. Now, if you guys win against the Eagles, I promise you your very own Atlanta Falcons Power Rankings next week. Git ’em, boys.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 3, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yardage-based ratings, eh?

Using yardage stats so heavily has got to be a very unique system, interesting find there!

by tom slick on Dec 3, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you into the college game?

If not, yardage is almost the only real way to go for comparing teams. I mean, things are much more equal in the NFL because you are only dealing with 32 teams full of grade-A All-Americans, so points is a viable way to go. But in college, trying to compare 120 teams of varying degrees of talent that never get a chance to play every single team in the game, well let’s just say it can get highly subjective real quick. Most use a ypp metric, either split between offense and defense, or a differential.

Here’s an interesting breakdown for those interesting in efficiency based ratings for the college game from everyone’s favorite, Football Outsiders.

You can also check this site out for even more college based stats and check on national, conference, and individual leaders.

FOR PONY!

by Jesse28 on Dec 3, 2009 3:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point there

I’ve never thought about CFB metrics much, didn’t realize how popular the yardage-based stats were. I usually look at the Sagarin ratings and the polls only, this may broaden my horizons a bit. Thanks for the links.

by tom slick on Dec 3, 2009 3:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No problem

"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC

by Jesse28 on Dec 3, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just so you know

The FEI that’s in the original FO link from Jesse is a drive-based stat from Brian Fremeau. They also have a guy doing a play-by-play-based stat called S&P Ratings. He’s Bill Connelly, one of the lead bloggers at SB Nation’s own Rock M Nation (Bill C.).

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Dec 3, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And these guys get PAID to do this?

Talk about your freakin’ dream job. Oh, to be young and statistically talented! One of these guys could be another Nate Silver or Bill James.

by tom slick on Dec 3, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I started to type out the explanation of FEI, but figured the link provided plenty of information and I didn’t want to leave anything out.

"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC

by Jesse28 on Dec 4, 2009 8:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok maybe i'm asking the wrong questions

I understand our defensive rating
But if the grade is 0-1 what does our offense have to do to rate 1
Shouldnt we have 1 on offense and bengals have 1 on defense

by simone219 on Dec 1, 2009 2:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

0 and 1 are limits

Technically, the ratings represent areas under a Normal Curve. They can approach 0 or 1 but not equal them.

by tom slick on Dec 1, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Outstanding, Thomas.

Statistics evades me — I’m told I have a poor z-score — but this makes sense. Can you do something to make it instill hope?

How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!

by AnOldBird on Dec 1, 2009 4:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Not shy about asking the tough questions, ARE you?

Looking back at my ratings for the 2007 season (30th place, 11.8 power rating), the Falcons have certainly made progress since bringing Comrade & Smitty on board.

Perhaps not quite as comforting as a mother’s love, but empirical evidence that we’re moving in the right direction long-term!

by tom slick on Dec 1, 2009 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you believe these rankings to be true reflection

If your going to score by points for and points against why not just points difference

by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 1, 2009 8:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Which would conveniently put the Saints at the top ...

Come on. Y’all are in first place. I hate to admit it, but you’ll probably do some damage in the playoffs. Bottom Line: Settle down Scooter.

Reporter: How will you address all of the dropped passes?

Mike Smith: I don’t think that we were as sharp as we have been catching the football. It’s something that is very fixable. It’s VERY fixable.

by FrankyWren on Dec 1, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

suuuuuuure you were

Reporter: How will you address all of the dropped passes?

Mike Smith: I don’t think that we were as sharp as we have been catching the football. It’s something that is very fixable. It’s VERY fixable.

by FrankyWren on Dec 1, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No matter how good things are

SOME people always want more, don’t they?

by tom slick on Dec 1, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That was a much better job than I expected.

I really am most impressed.

How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!

by AnOldBird on Dec 1, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ha

I just happened to be posting during my weekly moment of clarity. Thanks.

by tom slick on Dec 1, 2009 10:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stop Complaining

Why you Saints fans complaining? This stuff means nothing.

by falconplanet on Dec 1, 2009 10:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Everything is meaningless!

Sign up for a free account today to join the discussion about all things Atlanta Falcons!

by Dave the Falconer on Dec 2, 2009 1:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

THE SKY IS FALLING!

Corey Zickefoose: I think they should still be able to play football, regardless. Tennessee is my place. You know, it's my football team.

Reporter: Even after they put a gun in your face, you say let them play football?

Corey Zickefoose: Yeah. It's Tennessee. That's the way it is sometimes.

Welcome to the SEC!

by Jesse28 on Dec 2, 2009 7:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If the sky is the limit, then....well, crap!

How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!

by AnOldBird on Dec 2, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hmm

I am beginning to wonder if this may be the case. If so I am going to cash out and head to new zealand to wait for the 2012 doomsday event.

Life is a garden. Dig it!

by Hardcore Falcon on Dec 3, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Naaahhh...

Relax with a good movie like On The Beach and forget about it!

by tom slick on Dec 3, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uggghhh....the outlier effect.

It hurts my eyes to see the Titans (winners of five in a row) come in at #26 while the Patriots are #3…. Remove that 59-0 aberration that happened in Foxboro (where the Titans forgot to bring their pads) and their respective ratings are probably more reflective of their true offensive and defensive strength.

by TigerPaw on Dec 2, 2009 11:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Except that it DID happen

It might not accurately reflect how they are playing now, but I think it does a pretty good job of showing the relative strength of each team for the full season. The system does have some irrational love for the Redskins, though. Their offensive rating should be negative.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by orang3b on Dec 3, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Take a step back

Remember these are simple stats, intended to show the big picture. People often tend to try to read too deeply into numbers, and lose sight of how they’re derived; sort of like trying to write a thousand word book review of “Go Dog Go”.

by tom slick on Dec 3, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yet another reason I love the readership here

Easily my favorite Dr. Suess book and imo the best one ever. Retro references are full of win!

FOR PONY!

by Jesse28 on Dec 3, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That was P.D. Eastman.

I did my master’s thesis on its references to the Maharishi and Transcendental Meditation®. Okay, not really, but I had to bust up the love-in.

How many more days, Lord, must I walk through the wilderness?
GO FALCONS!!!

by AnOldBird on Dec 3, 2009 8:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Crikey, you're right

Oh well, I haven’t had those books since I was about nine, so I’m going to go with “my memory fails me”. Is that an acceptable answer? Haha. Oh well, I remember readin those books all together and that Go, Dog. Go! was my favorite.

"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC

by Jesse28 on Dec 4, 2009 8:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you know what I can't wait for

to see how low the Falcons drop in week 13

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Dec 7, 2009 9:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Waiting breathlessly, eh?

Ran the numbers Sunday night and they dropped to 19th. Now you can sleep easier tonight!

by tom slick on Dec 7, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

in some form or another

you are a hero of mine. One who wonders the streets and kicks wounded puppies to help take them out of their misery.

I thank you Oblivious to Sarcasm Man.

Truly, thank you.

know what you believe in and why you believe in it

by MentallyMIA on Dec 8, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Falcoholic Primer

Where Falcons fans come to roost.

Start posting about the Falcons »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ronniebrownjuke_small
Franchise Players
Small
The 2010 Falcons: Looking Back, Looking Ahead

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Fire_small
suggestions for a name change when the draft comes
Ken-jamie-celisa_small
What NFL team allowed the fewest points ever in a 14 game season?
Fire_small
UNDERATED FALCONS
Small
Might the Falcons draft Thaddeus Gibson in the 3rd round ?
Thricealchemyindex_small
Under the Cap - Dunta Robinson
Fire_small
Teams you like
Small
Should we draft Jerry Hughes?
Chrishanburgerlegends_small
The Greatest Pro Football Defenses Without A Title

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mile High Report
With the 1st Pick in the MHR 2010 Community Mock Draft...
Pride Of Detroit
Linebacker Landon Johnson Agrees to Deal with Lions
Silver And Black Pride
Should the Raiders trade Asomugha for Suh?

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

A Deeper Look At The 2009 Cowboys Running Game

Photo +1 updates

Rams, Redskins Showing Interest In QB Sam Bradford

Photo +1 updates

Conflicting Reports On The Future Of 49ers GM Scot McCloughan

More from SBNation.com >


Baron Of All He Blogs

Thefalcoholic_small Dave the Falconer

Marquis of Musings

Slideshow_777859_rook6_small tlozwarlock

Earl of Typing

Screen_shot_2010-01-16_at_10 brickcheney