The Falcoholic: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Guest Blogger: Juco All-American Answers Five Questions

Professor Frink’s Power Rankings, Week 8


33cvqlk_medium

via i37.tinypic.com

Brace yourself for some provocative Week 8 numbers.  Have fun! 

Star-divide

RATINGS COMPUTATION (must-read for newbies):

          At its heart, this is a VERY simple method of calculating ratings, using only two stats.  The results aren't supposed to be a perfect reflection of the real world, so don't take them too seriously!  It is interesting how such a crude algorithm can be as accurate as it is, though.

          Here's how the ratings are calculated.  The first step is to calculate two simple stats:  Points For per Game, and Points Against per Game, for each team.  These two leaguewide data sets for offense & defense both conform to a "Bell Curve", or Normal Distribution, that can be graphed.  Depending on where each team lies on that graph, they have a value between 0 and 1.  (This isn't something pulled from thin air.  It's a very common, standardized statistical analysis technique.  The purpose is to more accurately measure each team's position within the population of all league teams.)  You now have every team rated from 0 to 1, on offense and on defense.  Add those two numbers and you've got a total rating for each team.  Last, multiply by 50 to convert the ratings onto a 0-to-100 scale to make them more readable and intuitive.  There you go.  Simple, right?

Rank

Power Rating

 

W-L-T

PF/G

PA/G

 

Offense Rating

Defense Rating

Total

1

90.3

 

Colts

7-0-0

28.1

13.0

0.829

0.978

1.806

2

89.8

 

Patriots

5-2-0

28.3

14.0

0.834

0.962

1.796

3

79.4

 

Eagles

5-2-0

29.0

19.0

0.859

0.729

1.588

4

76.2

 

Cowboys

5-2-0

28.1

19.4

0.829

0.695

1.524

5

76.1

 

Ravens

4-3-0

28.4

19.6

0.839

0.684

1.523

6

74.4

 

Packers

4-3-0

26.7

19.1

0.769

0.718

1.487

7

73.0

 

Saints

7-0-0

39.0

22.0

0.995

0.465

1.460

8

69.7

 

Steelers

5-2-0

23.9

18.4

0.622

0.772

1.393

9

69.6

 

Jets

4-4-0

22.1

16.8

0.521

0.872

1.393

10

69.6

 

Vikings

7-1-0

30.5

21.8

0.903

0.488

1.391

11

68.5

 

Bengals

5-2-0

23.3

18.3

0.589

0.781

1.371

12

68.1

 

Broncos

6-1-0

20.0

13.7

0.396

0.967

1.363

13

61.4

 

Texans

5-3-0

24.8

21.0

0.671

0.558

1.229

14

59.3

 

Falcons

4-3-0

24.4

21.3

0.654

0.531

1.185

15

57.8

 

Chargers

4-3-0

26.4

22.7

0.756

0.400

1.156

16

57.4

 

Cardinals

4-3-0

22.4

20.4

0.539

0.610

1.148

17

57.2

 

Giants

5-3-0

26.5

22.9

0.759

0.385

1.145

18

55.1

 

49ers

3-4-0

21.0

20.0

0.454

0.647

1.101

19

53.7

 

Bears

4-3-0

22.7

21.4

0.556

0.518

1.074

20

47.1

 

Redskins

2-5-0

13.7

17.6

0.115

0.827

0.942

21

45.7

 

Seahawks

2-5-0

19.3

21.0

0.355

0.558

0.913

22

44.4

 

Dolphins

3-4-0

25.1

25.3

0.692

0.197

0.889

23

35.8

 

Bills

3-5-0

15.4

21.1

0.170

0.546

0.716

24

30.7

 

Panthers

3-4-0

18.3

23.7

0.302

0.313

0.615

25

26.8

 

Jaguars

3-4-0

19.0

25.3

0.340

0.197

0.537

26

15.9

 

Chiefs

1-6-0

15.0

25.9

0.156

0.162

0.318

27

12.2

 

Raiders

2-6-0

9.8

25.1

0.037

0.207

0.244

28

11.9

 

Lions

1-6-0

16.1

29.3

0.201

0.037

0.238

29

11.5

 

Titans

1-6-0

16.3

30.1

0.207

0.024

0.230

30

9.2

 

Browns

1-7-0

9.8

26.1

0.037

0.147

0.184

31

7.9

 

Buccaneers

0-7-0

13.7

29.0

0.115

0.043

0.158

32

5.8

 

Rams

1-7-0

9.6

27.6

0.035

0.081

0.116

 

 

means =

21.8

21.6

 

 

 

Means may not match until all teams have played the same number of games.

          Crazy looking numbers, you say?  After kicking the Gamble-Tron 2000 and recalibrating the Frinkometer, they actually make some sense when you consider how the algorithm works.

          Look at the Saints, Vikings, and Broncos.  Every one of those teams is great on one side of the ball and below average on the other.  Mathematically, these 3 teams cannot exceed a Power Rating of 75 as long as they remain below average on that one side of the ball.  I'm not saying it's just and fair, but it IS how the math shakes out.  If you remove those three turds from the punch bowl, the ratings look a lot more plausible.

          Just for fun and a semi-reality check, let's look at teams ranked by Point Differential per Game (DIFF/G), instead.  It's a most useful stat that correlates very highly with winning percentage.

Rank

DIFF/G

 

W-L-T

PF/G

PA/G

1

17.0

 

Saints

7-0-0

39.0

22.0

2

15.1

 

Colts

7-0-0

28.1

13.0

3

14.3

 

Patriots

5-2-0

28.3

14.0

4

10.0

 

Eagles

5-2-0

29.0

19.0

5

8.9

 

Ravens

4-3-0

28.4

19.6

6

8.8

 

Vikings

7-1-0

30.5

21.8

7

8.7

 

Cowboys

5-2-0

28.1

19.4

8

7.6

 

Packers

4-3-0

26.7

19.1

9

6.3

 

Broncos

6-1-0

20.0

13.7

10

5.4

 

Steelers

5-2-0

23.9

18.4

11

5.4

 

Jets

4-4-0

22.1

16.8

12

5.0

 

Bengals

5-2-0

23.3

18.3

13

3.8

 

Texans

5-3-0

24.8

21.0

14

3.7

 

Chargers

4-3-0

26.4

22.7

15

3.6

 

Giants

5-3-0

26.5

22.9

16

3.1

 

Falcons

4-3-0

24.4

21.3

17

2.0

 

Cardinals

4-3-0

22.4

20.4

18

1.3

 

Bears

4-3-0

22.7

21.4

19

1.0

 

49ers

3-4-0

21.0

20.0

20

-0.1

 

Dolphins

3-4-0

25.1

25.3

21

-1.7

 

Seahawks

2-5-0

19.3

21.0

22

-3.9

 

Redskins

2-5-0

13.7

17.6

23

-5.4

 

Panthers

3-4-0

18.3

23.7

24

-5.8

 

Bills

3-5-0

15.4

21.1

25

-6.3

 

Jaguars

3-4-0

19.0

25.3

26

-10.9

 

Chiefs

1-6-0

15.0

25.9

27

-13.1

 

Lions

1-6-0

16.1

29.3

28

-13.9

 

Titans

1-6-0

16.3

30.1

29

-15.3

 

Buccaneers

0-7-0

13.7

29.0

30

-15.4

 

Raiders

2-6-0

9.8

25.1

31

-16.4

 

Browns

1-7-0

9.8

26.1

32

-18.0

 

Rams

1-7-0

9.6

27.6

          Interesting that the Vikings and Broncos don't exactly dazzle using this yardstick, either.  The 4-3 Ravens and Packers are in the top 8 using both methods as well.  I'm just guessing, but I betcha Saints fans prefer this latter ranking.  What a spread there!

          Coming back to Power Rankings, the Ravens rose 9 spots; the Cowboys and Texans rose 6.  Teams with the largest declines were the Giants, 9 slots, and Broncos, down 7.

          That's all folks!  Remember that this is simple, math-driven Fun With Numbers.  Feedback is welcome, but please don't comment just to gripe about where your team's rated; the algorithm plays no favorites.  You can download the spreadsheet here if you like playing with the numbers.  Cheers!

This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.

3 recs  |  Comment 9 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Is it me

or did the font size of the data shrink? Man, I need a magnifying glass to read those numbers!

by tom slick on Nov 3, 2009 6:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

it's fine for me

if you are using firefox, ctrl+ or cmd+ can increase the font size.

Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I don't like that attitude. I can assure them it is much more serious than that. - Bill Shankly

by armchair quarterback on Nov 3, 2009 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it's interesting

to see the Jets at that position. i kind of expected them to have fallen more but, i guess their defense is still playing well despite the losses.

Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I don't like that attitude. I can assure them it is much more serious than that. - Bill Shankly

by armchair quarterback on Nov 3, 2009 6:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pretty high for a .500 team

Statistically, they’re definitely riding on the D all right. At least their fans can say that they’re definitely the best damn 4-4 team in the whole NFL, and no one can possibly argue!

by tom slick on Nov 3, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well done, Tom

This week your numbers lead the Ranking Tables on Blogging the Boys and come in 2nd on Bleeding Green Nation. You have made many people very happy lol.

Keep it up.

by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 3, 2009 6:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL

It must be my rigorous diet and moderate, teetotaling lifestyle.
Thanks!

by tom slick on Nov 3, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As always, great work

"This is America, if we can’t self-righteously look down on others and blame them for our faults, the commies win."-----Cormican on Bleeding Green Nation w/r/t fans overreacting to the Eagles signing of Michael Vick

by Jesse28 on Nov 4, 2009 8:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Change the algorithm?

I’m thinking of making some changes. Please see the thread at:
http://www.thefalcoholic.com/2009/11/4/1114925/professor-frink-wants-you
Thanks!

by tom slick on Nov 4, 2009 3:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

A Falcoholic Primer

Where Falcons fans come to roost.

Start posting about the Falcons »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thricealchemyindex_small
Digging Deeper into the Box Score: Week 9
Tom_slick_small
Professor Frink’s Power Rankings, Week 10
Images_small
Vent Fest '09 (DO NOT read this unless you want to read irrational venting)
Blueshirt_banter_small
Big Blue View answers your questions about the Giants
Small
Coach Smith Fine/Charity Collections Information

Recent FanPosts

8d2539ca7856491c8f1ac8514ecae5b7
Is Gonzo hurting our offense?
Thricealchemyindex_small
DVOA Matchup - NY Giants
Octagon_small
2009 Falcons Charity Toy Drive
Small
Should the Falcons pursue Larry Johnson?
Small
Giant's Fan Wondering what you guys think of us
Pict0025_small
Playoffs bound Falcons are Back!!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Baron Of All He Blogs

Thefalcoholic_small Dave the Falconer

Marquis Of Musings

Slideshow_777859_rook6_small tlozwarlock