Norwood

by iloveroddywhite on Jan 10, 2009 8:30 PM EST Comment 8 comments

hes bound to go to another team and get a much bigger role eventually when his contract is up. that brings about the question should we trade him and get some value for him, instead of none. hes worth at least a 2nd and 3rd rounder in my opinion. im not sure how many years he has left on his contract but there cant be many. it crossed my mind and i just wanted to hear what you guys had to say.

This FanPost was written by one of The Falcoholic's talented readers. It does not necessarily reflect the views of The Falcoholic.

0 recs | Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Absolutely not

I don’t think norwood is a primary back in this league. He’s got the speed, but he goes down too easily. He’s a great spell back, and I could see him getting taken away from us for that purpose when his contract is up. I just don’t see us trading a surefire big play guy for a draft pick. He’s worth way more than that.

by phoenix falcoholic on Jan 10, 2009 9:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

Look at his stats

Around 100 carries each of his first three seasons … but he rushes for less yards this season than in either of the previous two seasons. Yet … his receiving yards are higher this year than in either of the previous two seasons.

Dude is developing into an excellent complimentary back in our system. You have to think he likes his role.

I seriously doubt all 204 lbs (according to the official roster … yeah right) of him wants to be blocking angry linemen on a regular basis.

"He's getting better, but he's not there yet ..."
- Bobby Cox (talking about Boyer)

by FrankyWren on Jan 10, 2009 10:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

No way

I do not think that the front office will let him go, if they do their just creating another problem. The Harvin column would be legit if Norwood was to leave but in my mind there’s no need to get a guy who can run and catch because you already have a guy that can do that! It’s absurd.

by Grayson on Jan 10, 2009 11:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs