Matt Ryan Signs Huge Contract, May Start Week One
In the world of the National Football League, there are times you win in the long haul by not winning right away. Some of the greatest players of all time had a little time to sit, absorb the teachings of those older and wiser and then break the doors down with a competent team around them. History--and the rigors of the league--have not been kind to those who are thrown to the lions.
Yet according to the NFL Network's Adam Schefter, the Falcons have not learned from the grievous afflictions of the past. If Schefter is to be believed, the Falcons aspire to have Ryan starting the first week of the season. This, mind you, comes long before Ryan has had a chance to prove anything on the field. Signing someone to a huge contract and then feeling obligated to start them because of that contract is the hallmark of bad team management, and is exactly the opposite of what should've been done. If need be, the Falcons should've waited to hammer out something slightly less costly and should not even be considering starting Matt Ryan at the beginning of the season.
The performance of Ryan aside, what good will it do this team to trot him out there? With the line constructed the way it is now, the chances of him making it through the season without get his brain rattled and basically nil. And with the defense the Falcons will likely be trotting out there, he should have plenty of opportunities to get out there and get destroyed. While I can talk myself into believing that Ryan will be a good quarterback in this league with time, I cannot reach into the vast abyss of logic and pull out anything to support this move. It's completely and totally indefensible.
Compounding the problem is the fact that this could turn a training camp battle into a complete formality, alienating Joey Joe Joe and Redman. I'm pretty sure Joey's not going to want to stick around to be a third stringer one way or the other, but that could easily be the last straw. Shockley may in fact start the season on the roster.
These are just some vaguely educated guesses on my part, of course, but I do not like the sound of this at all. As a team with an awful lot to prove, the team shouldn't be giving away gobs of cash and a starting spot to players who haven't earned it. Sadly (or perhaps typically), some lessons never quite stick.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Only one man's opinion
Just because Schefter says something, doesn’t make it so. He’s full of crap as often as not, like most of the talking heads.
If the Falcons ARE stupid enough to start Ryan right away, I’ll be very disappointed with the new brain trust (and Blank). Disappointed, but not surprised, the way the last 40+ years have gone.
Let’s hope they get it right this time!
"There's no such word as 'quit' in swamp buggy racing, Marigold"
by tom slick on
May 21, 2008 12:17 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Another reason I hate talking heads.
Personally I wouldn’t put too much weight behind his comments, much less any of those guys. They are usually so off base because they think they are getting the “scoop” when really the people on the inside are more than likely just feeding these guys crap stories to keep all the other teams off balance and guessing. So, on that, I say bah, it’s nothing to worry about.
But, it is an interesting topic of discussion so let’s discuss. Should Ryan start week one or should he sit half a season or, should he sit for year one?
Scenario A reeks of poor management and bad PR moves. Is Ryan the best QB on the roster? Talent wise sure, but he is a rookie learning an entirely new offensive scheme and this isn’t college anymore. Everyone in the league was an All-something so the level of talent and competition he will face every down is clearly leaps and bounds above what he faced every week in the lowly ACC. (I’m a GT fan, trust me, I know.) I guess one could argue that the game time would be an invaluable experience for Ryan and that we would have a better chance at winning more games with him under center than Redman or Joey. I guess. I would argue that one would only need to look at Carr to see what happens when you put a rookie Q behind a complete mess of an offensive line. Sure, Ryan will break records, but do we really want him to break the sacks record in year one?
Scenario B is a much more sensible approach to the development of Ryan and the teams progression than the above plan. The team could start Redman with smatterings of Joey from time to time while Ryan calls plays from the sideline and reads that nice clipboard every Sunday so that every play gets branded into his memory. This plan of attack would give the team plenty of time to fully analyze and evaluate the offensive line, while also allowing time for any early season injuries to occur and be taken care of, so that they can make a better call on when Ryan should take over, or better yet, if we need to hit up the trade market for some more O-line help (which I think they should). Of course, this could mean that a certain amount of the fan base will be screaming for Ryan after every short pass from Joey and every time we lose, but I really don’t think Ryan starting in week one is going to change our win total that much. At least not this year anyways.
Scenario C is an obvious extension of B, but there are still some pro’s and con’s that should be mentioned. Keeping Ryan out for a whole year allows him to learn the system fully through practice, watching the game in action but from a safe distance, as well as possibly during some late fourth quarter duty. This keeps Ryan (hopefully) safe from any major crushing injury from all of those big bad defensive players out there on the opposing teams and protecting a 34mil asset is never a bad thing. The flip side to this plan is that you are paying a guy almost 6mil to sit on the bench for a year and to me that negates the work, if you can call it that, in getting the deal done so early. It would mean that management got trigger happy and should have waited and negotiated a lesser deal, in the least being 6mil less that the current one.
I believe that scenario B is the best course of action for the Falcons. It’s the best of both worlds in that Ryan doesn’t get thrown into the fire early and gets a chance to learn the system, and it also gets Ryan under center this year, which will obviously make a lot of people happy. Surely there will be many factors that go into determining what the true outcome will be such as his pay, how he performs in camp, injuries, and unfortunately Blanks desire to make any thought of Vick disappear, but that’s another topic for a separate thread I suppose.
Here’s to hoping Ryan will live up to that huge contract!
by Jesse28 on
May 21, 2008 8:52 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Awful idea
Just cause he is getting paid does not mean the team should try and get value by throwing him to the wolves. You can’t risk him getting shell shocked David Carr style. Give him time to learn the game and adjust to the league. Give the team time to build up around him. Him starting is not a make or break decision for the team this year, but starting him too early could be a make or break decision for the future. Its not worth it.
by SG Standard on
May 21, 2008 2:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Limited Reps, Mop Up Duty
In my humble opinion, I think Money should start the season on the bench as Jesse suggested. I don’t think its such a terrible idea however for Ryan to see some limited action earlier then week 6 or 8.
While I usually bash the idea of sticking a QB in situationally, in my heart I know the Falcons are at best a 7 win team this season (thats probably even a stretch, unless the O-Line wows me and Turner & Norwood are a dynamic Duo, backed up by the efficient passing of Redman, mixed in with game breaking plays by Roddy Roddy White. If all these things happen and the Defense is great, we can win the south) I don’t think it would be a bad idea to let Ryan run some 2 minute drills or take over during garbage time during weeks 1-8.
The downside of letting Money run the offense in bits an peices is that if he should have even moderate success and Redman and Joey Joe Joe flounder, ignorant (i.e. most) fans will scream for him to start. Even worse, if Redman is having great success heading Mike Smith’s O, sticking Ryan in there could create unneccessary waves..
Anyhow, in summary, let Money run some sets and get some pt, but definetly don’t let him start or play more then 10-20% of any game prior to week 6, and preferably prior to week 10…
by Hamburger on
May 21, 2008 9:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Money Changes Everything
Point 1: Yes, Ryan should sit for 6-10 weeks before starting.
Point 2: Hey, it’s a new offense so Ryan doesn’t have anything more to learn than Redman and Harrington except how fast everything moves in the NFL.
Point 3: Ryan isn’t making 6 times the money of the rest of the quarterbacks on the roster to sit and watch. So get used to the idea of seeing #2 under center for the first game of the season. And get used to watching #2 get sacked 6 times a game…
by Falco Chicquera on
May 22, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Throwing a rookie out there
Peyton Manning is used as an example of a success story of a rookie starting from day one, the 1997 and 1998 Colts were bad no doubt (3-13 both years) they weren’t the ordinary bad team looking for a QB. Their two previous 1st round picks were Marvin Harrison and Tarik Glenn, Peyton’s go-to WR and left tackle were in place before he arrived. Those Colts sucked because had one of the worse defenses in the league (29th) and Manning struggled like you would expect a rookie QB to (Only season with more INTs than TDs and one of the two years of his 10 year career where he didn’t make the Pro-Bowl). Manning joined a good offense, Marshall Faulk, Marvin Harrison, and an O-line that only gave up 22 sacks despite having a rookie QB drop back to pass 575 times.
Never throw a rookie QB in unless your offense (especially O-line) is already good.
my blog http://shakennbaken.blogspot.com
by shake n bake on
May 23, 2008 1:50 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Matty Ice Is GOD
LITERALLY…So, since he is all divine and stuff, I am thinking he’ll be good. Don’t quote me on that.
"You never know what I'm going to do..."
- Michael Vick (Palm Beach Post 11/6/2005)
by jamesrael on
May 28, 2008 10:03 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sit out first year
I’d rather pay 6 mil to teach someone about the game, than pay him 6 mill sitting home watching the games on tv. The falcon’s track record on healthy quarterbacks hasn’t been good over the years. How many have played a full season?
Personally, I’d rather see him on the sideline, reading the clipboard, and learning the game while the offensive line learns to play together. Joey Joe, Redman, and Shockley could be hurt as well, but at least they have experience dodging those big defensive players coming at them.
I’ll sure be glad to see the season get underway.
by henryinga on
May 23, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs







