The Monday Morning Draft Pep Talk
Time for the draftermath, I guess.
I'm planning on doing a profile on each one of our new players and his likely role with the team, which you can look forward to throughout this week and possibly next. There'll also be plenty of time to discuss just what the hell happened with this draft and whether Dimitroff's comments about the lines were simple misdirection or something more sinister.
I also want to add that I appreciate you guys keeping your tempers (mostly) under control, even though I didn't do such a great job of it. I'd like to remind everyone that we shouldn't be taking shots at one another just because we're pissed off about the way the draft went down; let's keep discussions civil. Also, as a few have urged, let's try to keep as open a mind as possible about this draft class. We may very well suck like a Georgia-based black hole this season, but we may also squeeze some significant contributions out of the new guys.
Above all, let's remember that we're Falcons fans. When life gives us lemons, we dive behind the couch in case those lemons are actually tiny bombs. If some of you haven't given up after following this team for 30 or 40 years, now sure as hell isn't the time to do it.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
Draft
by cchandler on
Apr 28, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nicks is a good point
The AJC is reporting that Dimitroff has some sort of overarching draft plan for the next few years, which means this isn't the last step and this season is basically only the first step. What I then have to ask--and cchandler, feel free to sing along--is why we went and drafted Matty Shark Attack when this team has a multiple-year rebuilding plan?
by Dave the Falconer on
Apr 28, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All I can figure
by SG Standard on
Apr 28, 2008 1:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
God help me
Well said. As much as I've been tempted to since 1970. I just can't imagine not rooting for the Falcons.
That said, they sure did seem like they had stage fright first time out in regards to the draft, didn't they?
by johnnybacardi on
Apr 28, 2008 11:55 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Rebuilding
Here's what I see. We needed a QB. We got a QB. By all accounts Ryan's smart. I'll take smart over a big arm. At least it should be a different kind of frustration than we had with Vick. This is me being hopeful. Perhaps the OL isn't as bad as we think? Between injuries, scheme changes, and the Petrinopocalypse, there has to be some improvement even without player changes. Snelling looked good last year, so don't ask me to make any sense out of the RB pick.
In the next 12 months, either before Week 1 2008 or after Week 16, Milloy, Joe Horn, Brooking, and Joey Harrington (or Redman if he stinks it up) will be gone. If we don't see anything great so will Jennings, Jenkins, and Jimmy Williams.
Hey, it can't be worse than last year.
by widderslainte on
Apr 28, 2008 12:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The 2007 Draft
http://www.atlantafalcons.com/News/Draft_Central/Draft_2007.aspx
Certainly still to early to judge, but it has held up so far as a very solid draft.
Longer term the 2008 draft class is going to be judged on how Matt Ryan works out, but it looks like a solid draft class to me. I think Lofton will turn into the guy that McKay hoped Ed Hartwell would be.
by 34hawk on
Apr 28, 2008 12:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree about Lofton
by Dave the Falconer on
Apr 28, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good and bad
by SG Standard on
Apr 28, 2008 1:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good stuff here...
The bottom line? Some/most of the mid-late picks that we were puzzling about came down to this: do we want someone who can contribute right away on ST, grow into our system and play multiple positions OR someone who we really don't think is going to be very good, can't contribute on ST and might end up a wasted pick?
From my perspective, this looks to be the beginning of a team with a number of tweeners...good athletes who are hungry to learn and play who can be shifted around the field and fill multiple roles (Jackson, Decoud, Biermann).
It was refreshing to hear our FO say "we're not going to bring a guy in here just to see if it works out." I hate all this crap about "upside" and "boom or bust." You can't build a team drafting guys like that.
by Dash on
Apr 28, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My problem with that
by SG Standard on
Apr 28, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
recent draft
by henryinga on
Apr 28, 2008 2:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The Kids
All in all it was a pretty surreal draft, not just for the Birds but just in general. The accelerated pace (which I loved), the Falcons pick of Ryan, the run of WR's in the 2nd round, the QB's selected in the late 2nd round, etc... It all seemed like a bizarre dream/nightmare.
Fun fact: The new format made this years 1st AND 2nd rounds combined last 45 shorter than last years 1st round alone.
by runningback on
Apr 28, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not surprisingly I agree with Runningback
I think we should all take a wait and see approach, we had faith in Dimitroff and Smith before, maybe the beleif that this was a Blankian Draft is a foolish over reaction to the selection of Maaaaaaattttttttttttttt Ryyyyyyyyyyyannnnnnnnnn....and maybe Ryan will sit for the year while a cohesive and potent offensive line is trained and allowed to gel...
Lets all take a deep breath, drink a beer, smoke a doobie, do whatever it is you do to relax, and realize that we added alot of depth at positions of need, and maybe just maybe The Good Comrade was scared off by Dorseys injury prone-ness.
I really hope that jet stream of bullshit turns out to be true...
(by the way, is a "Blankian" draft really so bad, look at the guys we've drafted since he's been owner - Boley, Norwood, (ignore Anderson) Hall (yeah he was a loud mouth and tended to be an idiot, but he could play a bit), Trey Lewis...Yes there have been busts, but every team has them...)
by Hamburger on
Apr 28, 2008 10:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Injury prone-ness?
by SG Standard on
Apr 28, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From espn insider & football outsiders...
Dorsey was hobbled by a sore hamstring, a sore back and a right knee sprain (which required a bulky brace) in 2007
Its a weak case, but a case nonetheless, I agree with you SGstandard, I just can't think of any other reason why they'd pass on him...
by Hamburger on
Apr 28, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's on me
The lesson here: I'm an angry person.
by Dave the Falconer on
Apr 29, 2008 12:10 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PS
by runningback on
Apr 28, 2008 11:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like Hamburger
by Dave the Falconer on
Apr 29, 2008 12:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Arthur's New Lap Dog?
Okay, the Falcons needed a QB. Can’t argue that. Unfortunately, we need most of the rest of the alphabet as well (LT, LG, TE, DT, WLB, CB, etc.). Dimitroff and Smith came in saying they would build the team from the inside out and then ended up doing what McKay would have done - which is bow to pressure from Blank and blow the 3rd pick on a QB just to make a splash. Then they had to overpay to draft a LT (damn, taking the 50th rated player with the 21st pick!). So instead of a bunch of big uglies that might have actually made the team better next year, we’ve “added depth” and created “competition.” Which are words that remind me of the letters UFA – couldn’t undrafted free agents provide a blocking tight end, an undersized LB and an “athlete?” Three more letters for Dimitroff - WTF?
by Falco Chicquera on
Apr 30, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It's a tough sell
I think even if they do have a grand, overarching plan (and OMG, I hope so), we as fans are going to have a hard time being satisfied until we see improvement in the product on the field. If that doesn’t come this year, I pity Dimitroff and Smith.
Football is not a contact sport. It's a collision sport. Dancing is a good example of a contact sport. ~Duffy Daugherty
by Dave the Falconer on
Apr 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs






